• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六项临床生理评分系统在预测急诊科老年和极老年急性上消化道出血患者住院死亡率中的表现。

Performance of Six Clinical Physiological Scoring Systems in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Emergency Department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi County 613, Taiwan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 11;59(3):556. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030556.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59030556
PMID:36984556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10057917/
Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the performance of six clinical physiological-based scores, including the pre-endoscopy Rockall score, shock index (SI), age shock index (age SI), Rapid Acute Physiology Score (RAPS), Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), in predicting in-hospital mortality in elderly and very elderly patients in the emergency department (ED) with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB). Patients older than 65 years who visited the ED with a clinical diagnosis of AUGIB were enrolled prospectively from July 2016 to July 2021. The six scores were calculated and compared with in-hospital mortality. A total of 336 patients were recruited, of whom 40 died. There is a significant difference between the patients in the mortality group and survival group in terms of the six scoring systems. MEWS had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value (0.82). A subgroup analysis was performed for a total of 180 very elderly patients (i.e., older than 75 years), of whom 27 died. MEWS also had the best predictive performance in this subgroup (AUC, 0.82). This simple, rapid, and obtainable-by-the-bed parameter could assist emergency physicians in risk stratification and decision making for this vulnerable group.

摘要

本研究旨在比较六种临床生理基础评分在预测急诊科(ED)老年和超高龄急性上消化道出血(AUGIB)患者住院死亡率的表现,这些评分包括内镜前 Rockall 评分、休克指数(SI)、年龄休克指数(age SI)、快速急性生理学评分(RAPS)、快速急救医学评分(REMS)和改良早期预警评分(MEWS)。本前瞻性研究纳入了 2016 年 7 月至 2021 年 7 月期间因临床诊断为 AUGIB 而就诊于 ED 的年龄大于 65 岁的患者。共纳入 336 例患者,其中 40 例死亡。死亡组和存活组在六种评分系统方面存在显著差异。MEWS 的曲线下面积(AUC)值最高(0.82)。对总共 180 例超高龄患者(即年龄大于 75 岁)进行了亚组分析,其中 27 例死亡。MEWS 在该亚组中也具有最佳的预测性能(AUC,0.82)。这种简单、快速且可床边获取的参数可以帮助急诊医生对这一脆弱人群进行风险分层和决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f55/10057917/8fe8927f5918/medicina-59-00556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f55/10057917/b6cf39037d13/medicina-59-00556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f55/10057917/8fe8927f5918/medicina-59-00556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f55/10057917/b6cf39037d13/medicina-59-00556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f55/10057917/8fe8927f5918/medicina-59-00556-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of Six Clinical Physiological Scoring Systems in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Emergency Department.六项临床生理评分系统在预测急诊科老年和极老年急性上消化道出血患者住院死亡率中的表现。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 11;59(3):556. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030556.
2
Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.改良早期预警评分、格拉斯哥布拉奇福德评分及内镜检查前罗卡尔评分在预测上消化道出血急诊患者预后中的有效性
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 30;23:109. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0194-z.
3
Internal validation and comparison of the prognostic performance of models based on six emergency scoring systems to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.基于 6 种急诊评分系统的模型对急诊科住院病死率预测的预后性能的内部验证和比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00459-7.
4
Rockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Rockall 评分预测老年急性上消化道出血患者的结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 14;19(22):3466-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3466.
5
Rapid Emergency Medicine Score: A novel prognostic tool for predicting the outcomes of adult patients with hepatic portal venous gas in the emergency department.快速急诊医学评分:一种预测急诊科成年肝门静脉积气患者预后的新型工具。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 15;12(9):e0184813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184813. eCollection 2017.
6
Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department.比较三种评分系统在预测急诊科成年患者预后方面的有效性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(5):e14289. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014289.
7
Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分系统与AIMS65评分系统在急诊科上消化道出血风险分层中的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):22-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.12554. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
8
Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.用于预测急诊科急性上消化道出血患者死亡率的评分系统。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;36(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.053. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
9
The comparison of modified early warning score with rapid emergency medicine score: a prospective multicentre observational cohort study on medical and surgical patients presenting to emergency department.改良早期预警评分与快速急诊医学评分的比较:一项针对就诊于急诊科的内科和外科患者的前瞻性多中心观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jun;31(6):476-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202444. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
10
Performance Assessment of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis Score, Modified Early Warning Score, Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, and Rapid Acute Physiology Score in Predicting Survival Outcomes of Adult Renal Abscess Patients in the Emergency Department.在急诊科预测成人肾脓肿患者生存结局方面,对死亡率在急诊科脓毒症评分、改良早期预警评分、快速急诊医学评分和快速急性生理学评分的评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Sep 19;2018:6983568. doi: 10.1155/2018/6983568. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Modified Early Warning Score System (MEWS) in the Assessment of Disease Condition and Prognosis of Patients After Neurosurgical Procedure or Intervention.改良早期预警评分系统(MEWS)在神经外科手术或干预后患者病情及预后评估中的应用
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Aug 18;18:2693-2699. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S532103. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk stratification and scoring systems in upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: review of performance and limitations in the emergency department.上消化道和下消化道出血的风险分层与评分系统:急诊科的性能与局限性综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 20;12:1564015. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1564015. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic value of National Early Warning Score and Modified Early Warning Score on intensive care unit readmission and mortality: A prospective observational study.国家早期预警评分和改良早期预警评分对重症监护病房再入院率和死亡率的预后价值:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 4;9:938005. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.938005. eCollection 2022.
2
Fresh Frozen Plasma in Cases of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Does Not Improve Outcomes.急性上消化道出血病例中使用新鲜冰冻血浆并不能改善预后。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 14;9:934024. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.934024. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population.
比较不同评分系统对老年社区获得性肺炎患者死亡率和 ICU 入院率的预测作用。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Oct 28;16:1917-1929. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S335315. eCollection 2021.
4
Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2021.美国胃肠道、肝脏和胰腺疾病的负担和成本:2021 年更新。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Feb;162(2):621-644. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
5
Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a territory-wide cohort study.急性上消化道出血内镜检查时机:全港范围队列研究。
Gut. 2022 Aug;71(8):1544-1550. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323054. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
6
Use of age shock index in determining severity of illness in patients presenting to the emergency department with gastrointestinal bleeding.应用年龄休克指数评估因胃肠道出血就诊急诊科患者的疾病严重程度。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:274-278. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Management of Non-Variceal Upper GI Bleeding in the Geriatric Population: An Update.老年人群非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的处理:更新。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2021 Mar 25;23(4):5. doi: 10.1007/s11894-021-00805-6.
8
Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021.内镜诊断和非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(NVUGIH)的处理:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南 - 2021 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):300-332. doi: 10.1055/a-1369-5274. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
The utility of MEWS for predicting the mortality in the elderly adults with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study with comparison to other predictive clinical scores.改良早期预警评分(MEWS)对预测新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)老年患者死亡率的效用:一项与其他预测性临床评分相比较的回顾性队列研究
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 28;8:e10018. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10018. eCollection 2020.
10
Modified early warning score-based clinical decision support: cost impact and clinical outcomes in sepsis.基于改良早期预警评分的临床决策支持:脓毒症的成本影响及临床结局
JAMIA Open. 2020 Apr 21;3(2):261-268. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa014. eCollection 2020 Jul.