• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国单外科医生机器人辅助经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补的初步经验。

Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Inguinal Hernia Repair by a Single Surgeon in South Korea.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Inha University Hospital & College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 15;59(3):582. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030582.

DOI:10.3390/medicina59030582
PMID:36984583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10059805/
Abstract

: Inguinal hernia is a common surgical disease. Traditional open herniorrhaphy has been replaced by laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Nowadays, many attempts at robotic herniorrhaphy have been reported in western countries, but there have been no reports in South Korea. The purpose of this study is to report our initial experience with robotic inguinal hernia surgery, compared to laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. : We analyzed the clinical data from 100 patients who received inguinal hernia surgery in our hospital from November 2020 to June 2022. Fifty patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 50 patients underwent robotic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system. All hernia surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) method. : The mean operation time and hospital stay were not statistically different. On the first postoperative day, the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score was significantly lower in the robotic surgery group (2.9 ± 0.5 versus 2.5 ± 0.7, = 0.015). Cumulative sum analysis revealed an approximately 12-case learning curve for robotic-assisted TAPP hernia surgery. : Robotic-assisted TAPP inguinal hernia surgery is technically acceptable to surgeons who have performed laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, and the learning curve is relatively short. It is thought to be a good step toward learning other robot-assisted operations.

摘要

腹股沟疝是一种常见的外科疾病。传统的开放式疝修补术已被腹腔镜疝修补术所取代。如今,西方国家已经有许多尝试机器人疝修补术的报道,但韩国还没有相关报道。本研究旨在报告我们在机器人腹股沟疝手术方面的初步经验,并与腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术进行比较。

我们分析了 2020 年 11 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在我院接受腹股沟疝手术的 100 名患者的临床资料。50 例患者接受腹腔镜手术,50 例患者接受达芬奇 Xi 系统机器人手术。所有疝手术均由同一位外科医生采用经腹腹膜前(TAPP)方法进行。

手术时间和住院时间的平均值无统计学差异。术后第 1 天,机器人手术组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分明显较低(2.9 ± 0.5 比 2.5 ± 0.7, = 0.015)。累积和分析显示,机器人辅助 TAPP 疝手术的学习曲线约为 12 例。

对于已经进行过腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术的外科医生来说,机器人辅助 TAPP 腹股沟疝手术在技术上是可以接受的,学习曲线相对较短。它被认为是学习其他机器人辅助手术的良好步骤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/4aa7f14bb66e/medicina-59-00582-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/a406a5a54d49/medicina-59-00582-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/1b20e9deffd2/medicina-59-00582-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/0898137f356f/medicina-59-00582-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/4aa7f14bb66e/medicina-59-00582-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/a406a5a54d49/medicina-59-00582-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/1b20e9deffd2/medicina-59-00582-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/0898137f356f/medicina-59-00582-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/10059805/4aa7f14bb66e/medicina-59-00582-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Inguinal Hernia Repair by a Single Surgeon in South Korea.韩国单外科医生机器人辅助经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补的初步经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 15;59(3):582. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030582.
2
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
3
Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后的长期生活质量及预后
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):261-269. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
4
Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is the new Da Vinci single port platform providing any benefit?机器人腹股沟疝修补术:新的达芬奇单孔平台是否有任何优势?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2003-2013. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09737-2. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis.机器人与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)双侧疝修补术:使用倾向评分匹配分析的多中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1188-1193. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09614-y. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
6
Results of robotic TAPP and conventional laparoscopic TAPP in an outpatient setting: a cohort study in Switzerland.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前疝修补术(robotic TAPP)与传统腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(conventional laparoscopic TAPP)在门诊环境下的结果:瑞士的一项队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2563-2567. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02552-2. Epub 2022 May 24.
7
No prostate? No problem: robotic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy.没有前列腺?没问题:前列腺切除术后机器人腹股沟疝修补术。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1757-1761. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01586-y. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
8
Transition from Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair to Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.从腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术过渡到机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:单中心回顾性研究
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2251-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3.
9
Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic transabdominal peritoneal repair for unilateral inguinal hernia: a propensity-score matched analysis.机器人与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补单侧腹股沟疝的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1131-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02730-7. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
[Clinical analysis of robot-assisted laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair].机器人辅助腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的临床分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 29;100(36):2858-2860. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200322-00881.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair as rescue therapy for recurrent inguinal hernia following robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair: a case report.腹膜内补片修补术作为机器人经腹腹膜前修补术后复发性腹股沟疝的挽救治疗:一例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jul 22;2025(7):rjaf523. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf523. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A Systematic Review of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Management of Inguinal Hernias in the 21st Century.开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术的系统评价:21世纪腹股沟疝的管理
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):990. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030990.
3
Video Review Can Measure Surgical Robotic Skill Development in a Resident Robotic Hernia Curriculum: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning curve of robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前修补术(rTAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的学习曲线:累积和(CUSUM)分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1827-1837. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08462-6. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Robotic TAPP inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 97 cases.机器人 TAPP 腹股沟疝修补术:97 例经验教训。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021 Jan 29;48:e20202704. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202704. eCollection 2021.
3
Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.
视频回顾可衡量住院医师机器人疝气课程中的手术机器人技能发展:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Oct 15;5(4):e500. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000500. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Safety and feasibility of single-incision robotic totally extra-peritoneal repair for inguinal hernia using the da Vinci Xi platform: a single-center prospective pilot study.单切口机器人完全腹膜外疝修补术在达芬奇 Xi 平台下治疗腹股沟疝的安全性和可行性:单中心前瞻性初步研究。
Hernia. 2024 Nov 19;29(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03188-5.
5
Is There a Place for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Realm of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Narrative Review.在腹腔镜和开放腹股沟疝修补领域,机器人腹股沟疝修补术有立足之地吗?一项叙述性综述。
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Sep;19(3):607-613. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.3.607.
6
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 26;19(2):e0298989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298989. eCollection 2024.
7
Abdominal Wall Hernias-State of the Art of Laparoscopic versus Robotic Surgery.腹壁疝——腹腔镜手术与机器人手术的现状
J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):100. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010100.
机器人腹股沟疝修补术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2277-2287. doi: 10.1111/ans.16505. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Comparative perioperative and 5-year outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair: a study of 153,727 patients in the state of New York.纽约州 153727 例患者的机器人与腹腔镜或开放式腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期和 5 年结果比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):7209-7218. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08211-1. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
6
Inguinal hernia surgery in Korea: nationwide data from 2007-2015.韩国的腹股沟疝手术:2007年至2015年的全国数据。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Jul;97(1):41-47. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.1.41. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人腹股沟疝修补术:技术是否正在接管?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):509-519. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01965-1. Epub 2019 May 15.
8
Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.原发性腹股沟疝:开放、腹腔镜经腹腹膜前、完全腹膜外和机器人腹膜前修补术的系统评价和贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析比较。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2. Epub 2019 May 14.
9
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Large Health System's Experience With the First 300 Cases and Review of the Literature.机器人腹股沟疝修补术:首个 300 例大型医疗体系的经验及文献回顾。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.070. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
INGUINAL REPAIR VIA ROBOTIC ASSISTED TECHNIQUE: LITERATURE REVIEW.经机器人辅助技术的腹股沟修补术:文献综述
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018 Dec 6;31(4):e1408. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1408.