Anoldo Pietro, Manigrasso Michele, D'Amore Anna, Musella Mario, De Palma Giovanni Domenico, Milone Marco
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, 80138 Naples, Italy.
J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):100. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010100.
Abdominal wall hernia repair, a common surgical procedure, includes various techniques to minimize postoperative complications and enhance outcomes. This review focuses on the comparison between laparoscopic and robotic approaches in treating inguinal and ventral hernias, presenting the ongoing situation of this topic. A systematic search identified relevant studies comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches for inguinal and ventral hernias. Randomized control trials, retrospective, and prospective studies published after 1 January 2000, were included. Search terms such as hernia, inguinal, ventral, laparoscopy, robotic, and surgery were used. A total of 23 articles were included for analysis. Results indicated similar short-term outcomes for robotic and laparoscopic techniques in inguinal hernia repair, with robotic groups experiencing less postoperative pain. However, longer operative times and higher costs were associated with robotic repair. Robotic ventral hernia repair demonstrated potential benefits, including shorter hospital stay, lower recurrence and lower reoperation rates. While robotic surgery offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays, faster recovery, and less postoperative pain, challenges including costs and training requirements need consideration. The choice between laparoscopic and robotic approaches for abdominal wall hernias should be tailored based on individual surgeon expertise and resource availability, emphasizing a balanced evaluation of benefits and challenges.
腹壁疝修补术是一种常见的外科手术,包括多种技术以尽量减少术后并发症并提高手术效果。本综述聚焦于腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗腹股沟疝和腹疝的比较,呈现该主题的研究现状。一项系统检索确定了比较腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗腹股沟疝和腹疝的相关研究。纳入了2000年1月1日之后发表的随机对照试验、回顾性研究和前瞻性研究。使用了诸如疝、腹股沟、腹疝、腹腔镜检查、机器人手术和外科手术等检索词。共纳入23篇文章进行分析。结果表明,在腹股沟疝修补术中,机器人手术和腹腔镜手术的短期效果相似,机器人手术组术后疼痛较轻。然而,机器人手术修复的手术时间较长且成本较高。机器人腹疝修补术显示出潜在优势,包括住院时间缩短、复发率降低和再次手术率降低。虽然机器人手术具有住院时间短、恢复快和术后疼痛轻等优势,但成本和培训要求等挑战也需要考虑。腹壁疝的腹腔镜手术和机器人手术方法的选择应根据外科医生的个人专业技能和资源可用性进行调整,强调对优势和挑战进行全面评估。