Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Eur J Pain. 2023 Aug;27(7):860-870. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2117. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the outcomes of the application of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nerve stimulation (PENS) targeting the median nerve versus surgery for improving pain and function in women with CTS.
In this randomized parallel-group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04246216), 70 women with CTS were randomly allocated to either PENS (n = 35) or surgery (n = 35) group. Hand pain intensity (mean pain and the worst pain experienced) was the primary outcome. Functional status and symptoms severity (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, BCTQ) and self-perceived improvement (Global Rating of Change, GROC) were the secondary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after each intervention. Analysis was performed with intention to treat with mixed ANCOVAs adjusted for baseline outcomes.
Analyses showed an adjusted advantage for PENS at 1 (Δ -2.0, 95% CI -2.9 to -1.1) and 3 (Δ -1.4, 95% CI -2.3 to -0.5) months for mean pain, at 1 (Δ -2.2, 95% CI -3.3 to -1.1), 3 (Δ -1.75, 95% CI -2.9 to -0.6) and 6 (Δ -1.7, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.6) months in the worst pain intensity, and at 1 (Δ -0.95, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.8), 3 (Δ -0.55, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.3) and 6 (Δ -0.4, 95% CI -0.6 to -0.8) months in function. Both groups exhibited similar changes in symptom severity. Both groups reported similar improvement at 12 months in all outcomes. Symptoms and function improved in both groups, with PENS leading to better short-term outcomes than surgery.
This clinical trial confirms that PENS applied with current understanding of pain mechanisms in CTS is as useful as surgery in women with CTS without denervation. The potential placebo effect of both interventions should not be ignored.
The application of percutaneous nerve stimulation was more effective at short-term, but similar effective at mid and long-term, than surgery in women with carpal tunnel syndrome.
本临床试验旨在比较超声引导经皮神经电刺激(PENS)靶向正中神经与手术治疗对改善 CTS 女性疼痛和功能的效果。
在这项随机平行组试验(ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04246216)中,70 名 CTS 女性被随机分配至 PENS(n=35)或手术(n=35)组。手部疼痛强度(平均疼痛和经历的最痛程度)为主要结局。功能状态和症状严重程度(波士顿腕管问卷,BCTQ)和自我感知改善(整体变化评级,GROC)为次要结局。在每次干预后 1、3、6 和 12 个月进行评估。采用意向治疗进行分析,采用混合协方差分析调整基线结局。
分析显示,PENS 在 1(Δ-2.0,95%CI-2.9 至-1.1)和 3(Δ-1.4,95%CI-2.3 至-0.5)个月时在平均疼痛方面具有调整后的优势,在 1(Δ-2.2,95%CI-3.3 至-1.1)、3(Δ-1.75,95%CI-2.9 至-0.6)和 6(Δ-1.7,95%CI-2.8 至-0.6)个月时在最痛强度方面具有调整后的优势,在 1(Δ-0.95,95%CI-1.1 至-0.8)、3(Δ-0.55,95%CI-0.8 至-0.3)和 6(Δ-0.4,95%CI-0.6 至-0.8)个月时在功能方面具有调整后的优势。两组在症状严重程度方面均表现出相似的变化。两组在所有结局中均报告了 12 个月时相似的改善。两组症状和功能均有所改善,PENS 在短期治疗中效果优于手术。
本临床试验证实,在正中神经 CTS 中应用当前对疼痛机制的理解的 PENS 与手术一样对无去神经支配的 CTS 女性有效。两种干预措施的潜在安慰剂效应不容忽视。
在短期,与手术相比,经皮神经电刺激的应用在腕管综合征女性中更有效,但在中期和长期效果相似。