• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

75岁以上男性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的应用:比较结果分析

Application of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men over 75 years: an analysis of comparative outcomes.

作者信息

Xia Zhongyou, Fu Xueqin, Li Jinze, Yuan Xinzhu, Wu Ji, Tang Lingtong

机构信息

Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China.

Department of Breast Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.

出版信息

Aging Male. 2023 Dec;26(1):2166919. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2023.2166919.

DOI:10.1080/13685538.2023.2166919
PMID:36988199
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to summarize the current evidence regarding the feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men aged over 75 years.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of four electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify eligible comparative studies as of April 2022. Parameters, including perioperative results and oncological and functional outcomes, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seven articles with 7575 patients undergoing RARP were included in this study. Patients with prostate cancer were grouped by age ≥ 75 years versus < 75 years. Our results demonstrated that compared with the older group, the younger group had better potency ( < .00001). However, there were no significant differences in operation time ( = .29), estimated blood loss ( = .13), length of hospital stay ( = .48), complications ( = .22), continence ( = .21), positive surgical margin ( = .28), and biochemical recurrence ( = .74) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes in men aged over 75 years undergoing RARP were not significantly different from those of their younger counterparts. RARP is feasible in men aged over 75 years.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在总结目前关于75岁以上男性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)可行性的证据。

方法

对四个电子数据库(中国知网、PubMed、科学网和考克兰图书馆)进行全面检索,以确定截至2022年4月符合条件的比较研究。对围手术期结果、肿瘤学和功能结果等参数进行评估。

结果

本研究纳入了7篇包含7575例接受RARP患者的文章。前列腺癌患者按年龄≥75岁和<75岁分组。我们的结果表明,与老年组相比,年轻组的性功能恢复情况更好(P<0.00001)。然而,两组之间在手术时间(P=0.29)、估计失血量(P=0.13)、住院时间(P=0.48)、并发症(P=0.22)、控尿情况(P=0.21)、手术切缘阳性(P=0.28)和生化复发(P=0.74)方面没有显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,75岁以上男性接受RARP的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结果与年轻男性相比没有显著差异。RARP在75岁以上男性中是可行的。

相似文献

1
Application of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men over 75 years: an analysis of comparative outcomes.75岁以上男性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的应用:比较结果分析
Aging Male. 2023 Dec;26(1):2166919. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2023.2166919.
2
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Outpatient Inpatient Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.门诊与住院机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:基于证据的比较结果分析。
J Endourol. 2022 Apr;36(4):468-476. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0643. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
6
[Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer].[经腹与腹膜外机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2017 Jun;23(6):540-549.
7
Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus open radical prostatectomy (ORP): a systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖患者行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)与开放性根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)的围手术期结局比较分析:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 10;18(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02010-9.
8
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review.腹腔镜和机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:一项 Cochrane 系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):845-853. doi: 10.1111/bju.14062. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
9
Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of Single-Port Multiport Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Meta-Analysis.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结局:一项荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2022 Jan;36(1):83-98. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0210. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保留背静脉复合体的神经血管束逆行释放:优化功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial experience of the Versius robotic system in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a study of 58 cases.Versius机器人系统在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的初步经验:一项58例病例的研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(1):30-36. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.241. Epub 2024 Jan 8.