Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Jul-Aug;89(7-8):680-689. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17100-8. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
This review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the side effects and efficacy of esketamine combined with propofol in procedural sedation and analgesia.
The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies occurring between their inceptions and September 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of sedation-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included recovery time, total consumption of propofol and body movement.
Data from a total of seven RCTs enrolling 808 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooling of data showed that compared with other drug regimens, the esketamine and propofol combination was associated with a reduction in the risk of hypotension (relative risk [RR]: 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25 to 0.56) and bradycardia (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.80) as well as an increase in the risk of agitation (RR: 6.29, 95% CI: 1.15 to 34.32). The results also indicated a decrease in propofol consumption (standardized mean difference: -1.45, 95% CI: -2.39 to -0.50) with the use of the esketamine and propofol combination. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in respiratory depression, nausea/vomiting, recovery time or body movement.
Esketamine combined with propofol has an advantage in reducing the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia during procedural sedation and analgesia, but it may increase the risk of agitation in the recovery phase. More studies of high quality are needed before the widespread adoption of the combination of esketamine and propofol.
本综述和荟萃分析评估了氯胺酮联合丙泊酚在程序镇静和镇痛中的副作用和疗效。
从建库至 2022 年 9 月,检索 PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中相关的随机对照试验。主要结局为镇静相关不良事件的发生率。次要结局包括恢复时间、丙泊酚总消耗量和躯体运动。
共有 7 项 RCT 共纳入 808 例患者的数据纳入荟萃分析。数据合并显示,与其他药物方案相比,氯胺酮联合丙泊酚与低血压(相对风险 [RR]:0.37,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.25 至 0.56)和心动过缓(RR:0.34,95% CI:0.15 至 0.80)风险降低相关,且激越风险增加(RR:6.29,95% CI:1.15 至 34.32)。结果还表明,氯胺酮联合丙泊酚使用时丙泊酚消耗量减少(标准化均数差:-1.45,95% CI:-2.39 至-0.50)。两组在呼吸抑制、恶心/呕吐、恢复时间或躯体运动方面无显著差异。
氯胺酮联合丙泊酚在降低程序镇静和镇痛期间低血压和心动过缓的发生率方面具有优势,但可能增加恢复阶段激越的风险。在广泛采用氯胺酮联合丙泊酚之前,还需要更多高质量的研究。