Suppr超能文献

瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于操作镇静:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Remimazolam propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Anesthesiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2023 Jun 12;11:e15495. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15495. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To improve patient tolerability and satisfaction as well as minimize complications, procedural sedation has been widely used. Propofol is the most widely used agent for induction of anesthesia and sedation by anesthesiologists. With a different mechanism compared to propofol, remimazolam is a new short-acting GABA-A receptor agonist. It is an ester-based benzodiazepine. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for procedure sedation.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy or safety of remimazolam versus propofol. Meta-analysis were conducted using RStudio with "metafor" package with random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of twelve RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients with remimazolam for procedural sedation had lower risk of bradycardia (OR 0.28, 95% CI [0.14-0.57]), hypotension (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.22-0.32]), and respiratory depression (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.14-0.36]). There was no difference in the risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.65, 95% CI [0.15-2.79]) and dizziness (OR 0.93, 95% CI [0.53-1.61]) between the remimazolam and propofol groups. Using remimazolam for procedural sedation is significantly associated with less injection pain compared to propofol (OR 0.06, 95% CI [0.03-0.13]). Regarding the sedation efficacy, there was no difference in sedation success rate or time to loss of consciousness, recover and discharge between the remimazolam and the propofol groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our meta-analysis, patients receiving procedural sedation with remimazolam had lower risk of bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression and injection pain compared with propofol. On the other hand, there was no difference in sedation success rate, risk of PONV, dizziness, time to LOC, recovery and discharge between these two sedatives.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362950.

摘要

背景

为了提高患者的耐受性和满意度,同时最大限度地减少并发症,已广泛使用程序镇静。异丙酚是麻醉师诱导麻醉和镇静最常用的药物。雷米唑仑是一种新型的短作用 GABA-A 受体激动剂,与异丙酚的作用机制不同,它是一种基于酯的苯二氮䓬类药物。本荟萃分析旨在阐明雷米唑仑与异丙酚在程序镇静中的疗效和安全性。

方法

电子数据库检索了比较雷米唑仑与异丙酚疗效或安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 RStudio 和“metafor”包进行荟萃分析,采用随机效应模型。

结果

共有 12 项 RCT 纳入荟萃分析。汇总结果表明,接受雷米唑仑镇静的患者心动过缓(OR 0.28,95%CI [0.14-0.57])、低血压(OR 0.26,95%CI [0.22-0.32])和呼吸抑制(OR 0.22,95%CI [0.14-0.36])的风险较低。雷米唑仑组和异丙酚组发生术后恶心呕吐(PONV)(OR 0.65,95%CI [0.15-2.79])和头晕(OR 0.93,95%CI [0.53-1.61])的风险无差异。与异丙酚相比,雷米唑仑用于程序镇静时,注射疼痛明显减少(OR 0.06,95%CI [0.03-0.13])。关于镇静效果,雷米唑仑组和异丙酚组的镇静成功率或意识丧失、恢复和出院时间无差异。

结论

根据我们的荟萃分析,与异丙酚相比,接受雷米唑仑镇静的患者心动过缓、低血压、呼吸抑制和注射疼痛的风险较低。另一方面,这两种镇静剂的镇静成功率、PONV 风险、头晕、意识丧失时间、恢复和出院时间无差异。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022362950。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d883/10269568/2e3c797c50cd/peerj-11-15495-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验