Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Psychiatric Institute, Department of Mood Disorders, PsyQ Kralingen, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 May 1;80(5):432-440. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0131.
Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) experience cognitive and emotional dysfunctions. Various brain circuits are implicated in BD but have not been investigated in a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies.
To investigate the brain functioning of individuals with BD compared with healthy control individuals in the domains of emotion processing, reward processing, and working memory.
All fMRI experiments on BD published before March 2020, as identified in a literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, Emcare, Academic Search Premier, and ScienceDirect. The literature search was conducted on February 21, 2017, and March 2, 2020, and data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2022.
fMRI experiments comparing adult individuals with BD and healthy control individuals were selected if they reported whole-brain results, including a task assessing at least 1 of the domains. In total, 2320 studies were screened, and 253 full-text articles were evaluated.
A total of 49 studies were included after selection procedure. Coordinates reporting significant activation differences between individuals with BD and healthy control individuals were extracted. Differences in brain region activity were tested using the activation likelihood estimation method.
A whole-brain meta-analysis evaluated whether reported differences in brain activation in response to stimuli in 3 cognitive domains between individuals with BD and healthy control individuals were different.
The study population included 999 individuals with BD (551 [55.2%] female) and 1027 healthy control individuals (532 [51.8%] female). Compared with healthy control individuals, individuals with BD showed amygdala and hippocampal hyperactivity and hypoactivation in the inferior frontal gyrus during emotion processing (20 studies; 324 individuals with BD and 369 healthy control individuals), hyperactivation in the orbitofrontal cortex during reward processing (9 studies; 195 individuals with BD and 213 healthy control individuals), and hyperactivation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex during working memory (20 studies; 530 individuals with BD and 417 healthy control individuals). Limbic hyperactivation was only found during euthymia in the emotion and reward processing domains; abnormalities in frontal cortex activity were also found in individuals with BD with mania and depression.
This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed evidence for activity disturbances in key brain areas involved in cognitive and emotion processing in individuals with BD. Most of the regions are part of the fronto-limbic network. The results suggest that aberrations in the fronto-limbic network, present in both euthymic and symptomatic individuals, may be underlying cognitive and emotional dysfunctions in BD.
双相情感障碍(BD)患者会出现认知和情绪功能障碍。各种大脑回路都与 BD 有关,但尚未在 fMRI 研究的荟萃分析中进行研究。
研究与健康对照组相比,BD 患者在情绪处理、奖励处理和工作记忆领域的大脑功能。
在文献检索中确定的 2020 年 3 月之前发表的所有关于 BD 的 fMRI 实验,PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、PsycInfo、Emcare、Academic Search Premier 和 ScienceDirect。文献检索于 2017 年 2 月 21 日和 2020 年 3 月 2 日进行,数据分析于 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月进行。
如果报告了全脑结果,包括评估至少 1 个领域的任务,则选择比较 BD 成年患者和健康对照组的 fMRI 实验。共筛选了 2320 项研究,并评估了 253 篇全文文章。
经过选择程序后,共纳入 49 项研究。提取报告 BD 患者和健康对照组对刺激的大脑激活差异的坐标。使用激活似然估计法测试脑区活动的差异。
对全脑荟萃分析评估了 BD 患者和健康对照组在 3 个认知领域对刺激的大脑激活差异是否不同。
研究人群包括 999 名 BD 患者(551[55.2%]名女性)和 1027 名健康对照组(532[51.8%]名女性)。与健康对照组相比,BD 患者在情绪处理过程中表现出杏仁核和海马回过度活跃和下额回活动减少(20 项研究;324 名 BD 患者和 369 名健康对照组),在奖励处理过程中眶额皮层过度活跃(9 项研究;195 名 BD 患者和 213 名健康对照组),在工作记忆过程中腹内侧前额叶皮层和扣带回前皮质下过度活跃(20 项研究;530 名 BD 患者和 417 名健康对照组)。在情绪和奖励处理领域,仅在轻躁狂时才发现边缘系统过度激活;在躁狂和抑郁的 BD 患者中也发现了前额叶皮层活动异常。
这项系统评价和荟萃分析揭示了 BD 患者认知和情绪处理相关关键大脑区域活动障碍的证据。大多数区域是额-边缘网络的一部分。结果表明,额-边缘网络的异常存在于轻躁狂和有症状的个体中,可能是 BD 中认知和情绪功能障碍的基础。