Suppr超能文献

健康、双相情感障碍及锂盐治疗中冒险行为适应性的神经特征

Neural signatures of risk-taking adaptions across health, bipolar disorder, and lithium treatment.

作者信息

Scholl Jacqueline, Panchal Priyanka, Nelissen Natalie, Atkinson Lauren Z, Kolling Nils, Saunders Kate Ea, Geddes John, Rushworth Matthew Fs, Nobre Anna C, Harrison Paul J, Harmer Catherine J

机构信息

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Inserm, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre U1028 UMR 5292, PsyR2 team, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France.

Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-02900-w.

Abstract

Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying bipolar disorder (BD) and its treatment are still poorly understood. Here we examined the role of adaptations in risk-taking using a reward-guided decision-making task. We recruited volunteers with high (n = 40) scores on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, MDQ, suspected of high risk for bipolar disorder and those with low-risk scores (n = 37). We also recruited patients diagnosed with BD who were assigned (randomized, double-blind) to six weeks of lithium (n = 19) or placebo (n = 16) after a two-week baseline period (n = 22 for FMRI). Participants completed mood ratings daily over 50 (MDQ study) or 42 (BD study) days, as well as a risky decision-making task and functional magnetic resonance imaging. The task measured adaptation of risk taking to past outcomes (increased risk aversion after a previous win vs. loss, 'outcome history'). While the low MDQ group was risk averse after a win, this was less evident in the high MDQ group and least so in the patients with BD. During fMRI, 'outcome history' was linked to medial frontal pole activation at the time of the decision and this activation was reduced in the high risk MDQ vs. the low risk MDQ group. While lithium did not reverse the pattern of BD in the task, nor changed clinical symptoms of mania or depression, it changed reward processing in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Participants' modulation of risk-taking in response to reward outcomes was reduced as a function of risk for BD and diagnosed BD. These results provide a model for how reward may prime escalation of risk-related behaviours in bipolar disorder and how mood stabilising treatments may work.

摘要

双相情感障碍(BD)及其治疗背后的认知和神经机制仍未得到充分理解。在此,我们使用一项奖励引导的决策任务来研究冒险行为中的适应性作用。我们招募了在心境障碍问卷(MDQ)上得分高(n = 40)、疑似双相情感障碍高风险的志愿者以及得分低风险的志愿者(n = 37)。我们还招募了被诊断为双相情感障碍的患者,在为期两周的基线期(功能磁共振成像研究为n = 22)后,将他们随机双盲分配至接受六周的锂盐治疗(n = 19)或安慰剂治疗(n = 16)。参与者在50天(MDQ研究)或42天(双相情感障碍研究)内每天完成情绪评分,以及一项冒险决策任务和功能磁共振成像检查。该任务测量了冒险行为对过去结果的适应性(与损失相比,先前获胜后风险厌恶增加,即“结果历史”)。虽然低MDQ组在获胜后表现出风险厌恶,但在高MDQ组中这种情况不太明显,而在双相情感障碍患者中最不明显。在功能磁共振成像检查期间,“结果历史”与决策时内侧额极的激活有关,并且与低风险MDQ组相比,高风险MDQ组的这种激活减少。虽然锂盐治疗在任务中并未逆转双相情感障碍的模式,也未改变躁狂或抑郁的临床症状,但它改变了背外侧前额叶皮层的奖励处理。参与者对奖励结果做出的冒险行为调节随着双相情感障碍风险和已诊断的双相情感障碍而降低。这些结果为奖励如何引发双相情感障碍中与风险相关行为的升级以及情绪稳定治疗可能如何起作用提供了一个模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验