Suppr超能文献

光学相干断层扫描血管造影术指标在缺血性与非缺血性视网膜中央静脉阻塞眼中的象限不对称性。

Quadrant Asymmetry in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics in Ischemic Versus Non-Ischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Eyes.

机构信息

East Bay Retina Consultants Inc., Oakland, CA, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Mar 1;12(3):30. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether quadrant asymmetry (QA) of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) metrics differs between non-ischemic versus ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

Fifty-eight eyes (21 non-ischemic, 10 ischemic CRVO, and 27 contralateral control eyes) underwent 3 × 3 mm spectral-domain OCTA scans with quantification of the superficial retinal layer vessel length density (VLD) and perfusion density (PD). QA, defined as the maximum-minus-minimum value among four parafoveal Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) quadrants, was compared by linear regression including fixed effects for each eye.

RESULTS

Mean age was 73.6 ± 11.4 (range 39-88), 73.8 ± 12.4 (range 39-91) and 77.2 ± 9.83, (range 60-88); and QA was 3.46 ± 1.76, 3.14 ± 1.57, and 4.88 ± 2.42 for VLD and 0.072 ± 0.038, 0.062 ± 0.036, and 0.11 ± 0.056 for PD for control, non-ischemic, and ischemic, respectively. QA was significantly higher in ischemic (0.109 ± 0.056) than non-ischemic CRVO eyes (0.062 ± 0.036; P = 0.02) and control eyes for PD (0.072 ± 0.038; P = 0.03). QA was also greater in ischemic (4.875 ± 2.418) than non-ischemic CRVO (3.141 ± 1.572) for VLD (P = 0.04). In terms of identifying which particular quadrant is most affected by ischemia, multivariate regression analysis comparing intra-quadrant effect on the presence of ischemia versus non-ischemia showed no quadrant was significantly affected (P > 0.05 for all quadrants).

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemic CRVO increases intraeye QA of OCTA metrics when compared to non-ischemic CRVO and control eyes. No specific ETDRS quadrant appears to be more affected.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

This work uses an intraeye method to delineate between ischemic and non-ischemic CRVO by OCTA imaging, overcoming inter-eye variables encountered in clinical care.

摘要

目的

确定光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)指标的象限不对称(QA)是否在非缺血性与缺血性中央视网膜静脉阻塞(CRVO)之间存在差异。

方法

对 58 只眼(21 只非缺血性、10 只缺血性 CRVO 和 27 只对侧对照眼)进行了 3×3mm 频域 OCTA 扫描,并对浅层视网膜层血管长度密度(VLD)和灌注密度(PD)进行了定量分析。通过线性回归比较了 QA,QA 定义为四个早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)象限中最大-最小-最小值,包括每个眼的固定效应。

结果

平均年龄为 73.6±11.4(范围 39-88)、73.8±12.4(范围 39-91)和 77.2±9.83(范围 60-88);QA 分别为 VLD 的 3.46±1.76、3.14±1.57 和 4.88±2.42,以及 PD 的 0.072±0.038、0.062±0.036 和 0.11±0.056,对于对照、非缺血性和缺血性分别为 0.109±0.056。与非缺血性 CRVO 眼(0.062±0.036;P=0.02)和对照组(0.072±0.038;P=0.03)相比,缺血性眼的 QA 显著更高。对于 VLD,缺血性眼(4.875±2.418)也高于非缺血性 CRVO 眼(3.141±1.572)(P=0.04)。在确定哪些特定象限受缺血影响最大方面,比较存在缺血与非缺血的象限内效应的多变量回归分析显示,没有一个象限受到显著影响(所有象限的 P>0.05)。

结论

与非缺血性 CRVO 和对照眼相比,缺血性 CRVO 增加了 OCTA 指标的眼内 QA。没有特定的 ETDRS 象限似乎受到更大的影响。

翻译

陈诗雨

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/10064914/aab7ab4312c0/tvst-12-3-30-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验