National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;41(10):1795-1808. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02571.
To determine, in women with primary operable breast cancer, if preoperative doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan; AC) therapy yields a better outcome than postoperative AC therapy, if a relationship exists between outcome and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy, and if such therapy results in the performance of more lumpectomies.
Women (1,523) enrolled onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative AC therapy. Clinical tumor response to preoperative therapy was graded as complete (cCR), partial (cPR), or no response (cNR). Tumors with a cCR were further categorized as either pathologic complete response (pCR) or invasive cells (pINV). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were estimated through 5 years and compared between treatment groups. In the preoperative arm, proportional-hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between outcome and tumor response.
There was no significant difference in DFS, DDFS, or survival (P = .99, .70, and .83, respectively) among patients in either group. More patients treated preoperatively than postoperatively underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy (67.8% v 59.8%, respectively). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy were similar in both groups (7.9% and 5.8%, respectively; P = .23). Outcome was better in women whose tumors showed a pCR than in those with a pINV, cPR, or cNR (relapse-free survival [RFS] rates, 85.7%, 76.9%, 68.1%, and 63.9%, respectively; P < .0001), even when baseline prognostic variables were controlled. When prognostic models were compared for each treatment group, the preoperative model, which included breast tumor response as a variable, discriminated outcome among patients to about the same degree as the postoperative model.
Preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, permits more lumpectomies, is appropriate for the treatment of certain patients with stages I and II disease, and can be used to study breast cancer biology. Tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases; however, knowledge of such a response provided little prognostic information beyond that which resulted from postoperative therapy.
在患有原发性可手术乳腺癌的女性中,确定术前多柔比星(阿霉素)和环磷酰胺(环磷酰胺; AC)治疗是否比术后 AC 治疗效果更好,如果治疗结果与肿瘤对术前化疗的反应之间存在关系,以及这种治疗是否会导致更多的保乳手术。
共有 1523 名女性被纳入国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目(NSABP)B-18 进行随机分组,分别接受术前或术后 AC 治疗。临床肿瘤对术前治疗的反应分为完全缓解(cCR)、部分缓解(cPR)或无反应(cNR)。cCR 肿瘤进一步分为病理完全缓解(pCR)或浸润细胞(pINV)。通过 5 年估计无病生存(DFS)、远处无病生存(DDFS)和生存,并比较两组之间的差异。在术前组中,使用比例风险模型研究结果与肿瘤反应之间的关系。
两组患者的 DFS、DDFS 或生存无显著差异(分别为 P=0.99、0.70 和 0.83)。与术后治疗组相比,更多的患者接受了术前保乳切除术和放疗(分别为 67.8%和 59.8%)。两组保乳术后同侧乳房肿瘤复发(IBTR)率相似(分别为 7.9%和 5.8%;P=0.23)。与 pINV、cPR 或 cNR 相比,肿瘤 pCR 的患者结局更好(无复发生存率分别为 85.7%、76.9%、68.1%和 63.9%;P<0.0001),即使控制了基线预后变量。当对每组治疗组进行预后模型比较时,包括肿瘤反应在内的术前模型对患者的预后区分程度与术后模型相同。
术前化疗与术后化疗同样有效,可进行更多保乳手术,适用于某些 I 期和 II 期疾病患者的治疗,并且可用于研究乳腺癌生物学。术前化疗对肿瘤的反应与治疗结果相关,可能是评估化疗对微转移影响的替代指标;但是,与术后治疗相比,这种反应提供的预后信息很少。