Suppr超能文献

行体外心肺复苏的患者肝素初始负荷剂量。

Heparin Loading Dose in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Jul;37(7):1201-1207. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences in hemorrhagic and embolic complications among extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) patients who received and did not receive a loading dose of heparin.

DESIGN

This study is a controlled before-after monocentric retrospective study.

SETTING

The emergency department of the Aerospace Center Hospital (ASCH).

PARTICIPANTS

The authors studied a total of 28 patients who, after a cardiac arrest, underwent ECPR in the emergency department of the ASCH from January 2018 to May 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

The authors compared the hemorrhagic and embolic complications and prognosis of the 2 groups based on whether they received a loading dose of heparin anticoagulation therapy before catheterization (a loading-dose group and a non-loading dose- group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were 12 patients in the loading-dose group and 16 in the nonloading-dose group. There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex, underlying diseases, causes of cardiac arrest, and hypoperfusion time between the 2 groups. The incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 75% in the loading-dose group and 67.5% in the nonloading-dose group. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The incidence of life-threatening massive hemorrhage in the loading-dose group was 50%, and in the nonloading-dose group, it was 12.5%. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (p = 0.03). The incidence of embolic complications in the loading-dose group and nonloading-dose group was 8.3% and 12.5%, respectively, and the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The survival rates of the 2 groups were 8.3% v 18.8%, respectively, and the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, in the authors' study of patients undergoing ECPR, administering a loading dose of heparin was associated with an increased risk of early fatal hemorrhage. However, stopping this loading dose did not raise the risk of embolic complications. It also did not lower the risk of total hemorrhage and transfusion.

摘要

目的

研究接受和未接受肝素负荷剂量的体外心肺复苏(ECPR)患者出血和栓塞并发症的差异。

设计

本研究为对照前后、单中心回顾性研究。

地点

航天中心医院(ASCH)急诊科。

参与者

作者研究了 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月期间在 ASCH 急诊科接受 ECPR 的共 28 例心脏骤停患者。

干预

作者比较了两组患者在导管插入术前是否接受肝素抗凝治疗负荷剂量(负荷剂量组和非负荷剂量组)的出血和栓塞并发症及预后。

测量和主要结果

负荷剂量组 12 例,非负荷剂量组 16 例。两组患者在年龄、性别、基础疾病、心脏骤停原因和低灌注时间方面无统计学差异。负荷剂量组出血并发症发生率为 75%,非负荷剂量组为 67.5%。两组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。负荷剂量组发生危及生命的大出血的发生率为 50%,非负荷剂量组为 12.5%。两组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.03)。负荷剂量组和非负荷剂量组栓塞并发症的发生率分别为 8.3%和 12.5%,两组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两组的生存率分别为 8.3%和 18.8%,两组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

总之,在作者的 ECPR 患者研究中,给予肝素负荷剂量与早期致命性出血风险增加相关。然而,停止这种负荷剂量不会增加栓塞并发症的风险。也不会降低总出血和输血的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验