• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚六亚甲基双胍(PHMB)和甜菜碱伤口床准备与静脉溃疡标准护理的成本效益比较:英国的成本效用分析。

Cost-Effectiveness of PHMB & betaine wound bed preparation compared with standard care in venous leg ulcers: A cost-utility analysis in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

Centre for Health Social Care, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, UK; B. Braun Medical UK, Sheffield, UK.

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.

出版信息

J Tissue Viability. 2023 May;32(2):262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2023.03.001
PMID:36990897
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wounds cost £8.3 billion per year in the United Kingdom (UK) annually. Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) account for 15% of wounds and can be complicated to heal, increasing nurse visits and resource costs. Recent wound bed preparation consensus recommends wound cleansing and biofilm disrupting agents. However, inert cleansers such as tap water or saline are inexpensive, an evaluation of evidence is required to justify the higher upfront costs of treatment with active cleansers. We undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of a biofilm disrupting and cleansing solution and gel, Prontosan® Solution and Gel X, (PSGX) (B Braun Medical), as compared to the standard practice of using saline solution, for treating VLUs.

METHODS

A Markov model was parameterised to one-year costs and health-related quality of life consequences of treating chronic VLUs with PSGX versus saline solution. Costs are viewed from a UK healthcare payer perspective, include routine care and management of complications. A systematic literature search was performed to inform the clinical parameters of the economic model. Deterministic univariate sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were undertaken.

RESULTS

For PSGX an Incremental Net Monetary Benefit (INMB) of £1,129.65 to £1,042.39 per patient (with a Maximum Willingness to Pay of £30k and £20k per QALY respectively), of which cost savings are £867.87 and 0.0087 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gain per patient. PSA indicates a 99.3% probability of PSGX being cost-effective over saline.

CONCLUSIONS

PSGX for the treatment of VLUs is dominant compared with saline solution in the UK with expected cost-savings within a year and improved patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

在英国,每年伤口治疗费用高达 83 亿英镑。静脉溃疡(VLUs)占伤口的 15%,且难以愈合,增加了护士访视次数和资源成本。最近的伤口床准备共识建议进行伤口清洁和生物膜破坏剂处理。然而,自来水或生理盐水等惰性清洁剂价格低廉,需要评估证据以证明使用活性清洁剂治疗的前期成本更高是合理的。我们对使用生物膜破坏和清洁溶液和凝胶(Prontosan® Solution and Gel X,PSGX)(B Braun Medical)与生理盐水标准治疗方案治疗静脉溃疡(VLUs)的成本效益进行了分析。

方法

使用 Markov 模型对使用 PSGX 与生理盐水治疗慢性 VLUs 的一年成本和健康相关生活质量后果进行了参数化。成本从英国医疗保健支付者的角度考虑,包括常规护理和并发症管理。进行了系统的文献检索,为经济模型的临床参数提供信息。进行了确定性单变量敏感性分析(DSA)和概率敏感性分析(PSA)。

结果

对于 PSGX,每位患者的增量净货币收益(INMB)为 1129.65 英镑至 1042.39 英镑(最大意愿支付分别为 30 千英镑和 20 千英镑/每 QALY),其中节省的成本为 867.87 英镑和 0.0087 个质量调整生命年(QALY)每位患者的收益。PSA 表明,PSGX 在英国治疗 VLUs 的成本效益比生理盐水高 99.3%。

结论

PSGX 治疗 VLUs 比生理盐水在英国具有优势,预计一年内可节省成本,并改善患者预后。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of PHMB & betaine wound bed preparation compared with standard care in venous leg ulcers: A cost-utility analysis in the United Kingdom.聚六亚甲基双胍(PHMB)和甜菜碱伤口床准备与静脉溃疡标准护理的成本效益比较:英国的成本效用分析。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 May;32(2):262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
Wound cleansing for treating venous leg ulcers.伤口清洗治疗静脉性腿部溃疡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 10;3(3):CD011675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011675.pub2.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using intermittent pneumatic compression to manage hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers in the UK.在英国使用间歇性气动压迫疗法治疗难愈合下肢静脉溃疡的成本效益分析
J Wound Care. 2021 Jul 2;30(7):544-552. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.7.544.
4
Skin Substitutes for Adults With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.成人糖尿病足溃疡和静脉性腿部溃疡用皮肤替代品:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 Jun 4;21(7):1-165. eCollection 2021.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a hydration response technology dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the UK.英国一种水合反应技术敷料治疗下肢静脉溃疡的成本效益分析。
J Wound Care. 2018 Mar 2;27(3):166-172. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.166.
6
Estimating the Clinical Outcomes and Cost Differences Between Standard Care With and Without Cadexomer Iodine in the Management of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers Using a Markov Model.使用马尔可夫模型评估在慢性下肢静脉溃疡管理中使用和不使用碘卡多酯的标准护理之间的临床结果和成本差异。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016 Jun;62(6):26-40.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Debrichem in managing hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers in the UK.Debrichem在英国治疗难愈合下肢静脉溃疡中的成本效益。
J Wound Care. 2022 Jun 2;31(6):480-491. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.6.480.
8
Cost-utility of a biofilm-disrupting gel versus standard of care in chronic wounds: a Markov microsimulation model based on a randomised controlled trial.生物膜破坏凝胶与慢性伤口护理标准的成本效用:基于随机对照试验的马尔可夫微观模拟模型
J Wound Care. 2019 Jul 1;28(Sup7):S24-S38. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup7.S24.
9
Wound bed preparation: a case series using polyhexanide and betaine solution and gel-a UK perspective.伤口床准备:使用聚己醛和甜菜碱溶液和凝胶的病例系列-英国视角。
J Wound Care. 2020 Jul 2;29(7):380-386. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.7.380.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Compression Therapy With Early Endovenous Ablation in Venous Ulceration for a Medicare Population.医保人群静脉溃疡中早期静脉内消融联合压迫治疗的成本效果分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2248152. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48152.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of intralesional and perilesional recombinant human epidermal growth factor vs hydrocolloid therapy in venous ulcer treatment in the Colombian context.在哥伦比亚背景下,静脉溃疡治疗中腔内和腔周重组人表皮生长因子与水胶体疗法的成本效益分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101745. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101745. Epub 2023 Dec 23.