Suppr超能文献

津巴布韦的不平等与私人医疗保险:历史、政治与绩效。

Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance.

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Community Health Sciences Unit (CHSU), Private Bag 65, Area 3, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box A178, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 29;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01868-9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Zimbabwe has one of the highest rates of private health insurance (PHI) expenditures as a share of total health expenditures in the world. The perfomamce of PHI, known as Medical Aid Societies in Zimbabwe, requires close monitoring since market failures and weaknesses in public policy and regulation can affect overall health system performance. Despite the considerable influence of politics (stakeholder interests) and history (past events) in shaping PHI design and implementation, these factors are frequently sidelined when analyzing PHI in Zimbabwe. This study considers the roles of history and politics in shaping PHI and determining its impact on health system performance in Zimbabwe.

METHODS

We reviewed 50 sources of information using Arksey & O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework. To frame our analysis, we used a conceptual framework that integrates economic theory with political and historical aspects developed by Thomson et al. (2020) to analyze PHI in diverse contexts.

RESULTS

We present a timeline of the history and politics of PHI in Zimbabwe from the 1930s to present. Zimbabwe's current PHI coverage is segmented along socio-economic lines due to a long history of elitist and exclusionary politics in coverage patterns. While PHI was considered to perform relatively well up to the mid-1990s, the economic crisis of the 2000s eroded trust among insurers, providers, and patients. That culminated in agency problems which severely lessened PHI coverage quality with concurrent deterioration in efficiency and equity-related performance dimensions.

CONCLUSION

The present design and performance of PHI in Zimbabwe is primarily a function of history and politics rather than informed choice. Currently, PHI in Zimbabwe does not meet the evaluative criteria of a well-performing health insurance system. Therefore, reform efforts to expand PHI coverage or improve PHI performance must explicitly consider the relevant historical, political and economic aspects for successful reformation.

摘要

简介

津巴布韦是世界上私人医疗保险(PHI)支出占总卫生支出比例最高的国家之一。PHI 的表现(在津巴布韦被称为医疗援助协会)需要密切监测,因为市场失灵和公共政策与监管方面的弱点会影响整体卫生系统绩效。尽管政治(利益相关者利益)和历史(过去事件)在塑造 PHI 设计和实施方面具有相当大的影响,但在分析津巴布韦的 PHI 时,这些因素经常被忽视。本研究考虑了历史和政治在塑造 PHI 及其对津巴布韦卫生系统绩效的影响方面的作用。

方法

我们使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)的方法框架审查了 50 个信息来源。为了框架我们的分析,我们使用了一个概念框架,该框架将经济理论与 Thomson 等人(2020 年)开发的政治和历史方面结合起来,以分析不同背景下的 PHI。

结果

我们展示了津巴布韦 PHI 历史和政治的时间线,从 20 世纪 30 年代至今。津巴布韦目前的 PHI 覆盖范围是根据长期的精英主义和排他性政治在覆盖模式方面的历史而划分的。虽然 PHI 在 20 世纪 90 年代中期之前被认为表现相对较好,但 21 世纪 00 年代的经济危机削弱了保险公司、提供商和患者之间的信任。这最终导致了代理问题,严重降低了 PHI 覆盖质量,同时效率和公平相关绩效维度也恶化。

结论

津巴布韦目前 PHI 的设计和绩效主要是历史和政治的结果,而不是明智选择的结果。目前,津巴布韦的 PHI 不符合运作良好的医疗保险系统的评估标准。因此,扩大 PHI 覆盖范围或改善 PHI 绩效的改革努力必须明确考虑相关的历史、政治和经济方面,以实现成功改革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db6c/10061904/38edd592cbd2/12939_2023_1868_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验