• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对已批准的抗丙型肝炎病毒药物用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎感染的综合分子与临床研究:基础医学与临床医学之间的明显差距

A Comprehensive Molecular and Clinical Investigation of Approved Anti-HCV Drugs Repurposing against SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Glaring Gap between Benchside and Bedside Medicine.

作者信息

Bansode Sneha, Singh Pawan Kumar, Tellis Meenakshi, Chugh Anita, Deshmukh Narendra, Gupta Mahesh, Verma Savita, Giri Ashok, Kulkarni Mahesh, Joshi Rakesh, Chaudhary Dhruva

机构信息

CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Biochemical Sciences Division, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411008, India.

Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak 124001, India.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 22;11(3):515. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030515.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines11030515
PMID:36992099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10056950/
Abstract

The limited availability of effective treatment against SARS-CoV-2 infection is a major challenge in managing COVID-19. This scenario has augmented the need for repurposing anti-virals for COVID-19 mitigation. In this report, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential of anti-HCV drugs such as daclatasvir (DCV) or ledipasvir (LDP) in combination with sofosbuvir (SOF) was evaluated. The binding mode and higher affinity of these molecules with RNA-dependent-RNA-polymerase of SARS-CoV-2 were apparent by computational analysis. In vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity depicted that SOF/DCV and SOF/LDP combination has IC of 1.8 and 2.0 µM, respectively, comparable to remdesivir, an approved drug for COVID-19. Furthermore, the clinical trial was conducted in 183 mild COVID-19 patients for 14 days to check the efficacy and safety of SOF/DCV and SOF/LDP compared to standard of care (SOC) in a parallel-group, hybrid, individually randomized, controlled clinical study. The primary outcomes of the study suggested no significant difference in negativity after 3, 7 and 14 days in both treatments. None of the patients displayed any worsening in the disease severity, and no mortality was observed in the study. Although, the post hoc exploratory analysis indicated significant normalization of the pulse rate showed in SOF/DCV and SOF/LDP treatment vs. SOC. The current study highlights the limitations of bench side models in predicting the clinical efficacy of drugs that are planned for repurposing.

摘要

针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的有效治疗方法供应有限,这是管理2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的一项重大挑战。这种情况增加了重新利用抗病毒药物来减轻COVID-19病情的需求。在本报告中,评估了抗丙型肝炎病毒药物(如达卡他韦(DCV)或来迪派韦(LDP))与索磷布韦(SOF)联合使用时的抗SARS-CoV-2潜力。通过计算分析可知,这些分子与SARS-CoV-2的RNA依赖性RNA聚合酶的结合模式及更高亲和力是明显的。体外抗SARS-CoV-2活性表明,SOF/DCV和SOF/LDP组合的半数抑制浓度(IC)分别为1.8和2.0微摩尔,与COVID-19的获批药物瑞德西韦相当。此外,在一项平行组、混合、个体随机对照临床研究中,对183例轻度COVID-19患者进行了为期14天的临床试验,以检验SOF/DCV和SOF/LDP相对于标准治疗(SOC)的疗效和安全性。该研究的主要结果表明,两种治疗在第3、7和14天的病毒转阴率无显著差异。没有患者的疾病严重程度出现任何恶化,且研究中未观察到死亡病例。尽管事后探索性分析表明,与SOC相比,SOF/DCV和SOF/LDP治疗组患者的脉搏率显著恢复正常。当前研究突出了实验台模型在预测计划重新利用药物的临床疗效方面的局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/afbdce036d66/vaccines-11-00515-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/ed8219d0df81/vaccines-11-00515-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/f512ee3a4b9a/vaccines-11-00515-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/0556576ccb0d/vaccines-11-00515-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/afbdce036d66/vaccines-11-00515-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/ed8219d0df81/vaccines-11-00515-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/f512ee3a4b9a/vaccines-11-00515-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/0556576ccb0d/vaccines-11-00515-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3672/10056950/afbdce036d66/vaccines-11-00515-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comprehensive Molecular and Clinical Investigation of Approved Anti-HCV Drugs Repurposing against SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Glaring Gap between Benchside and Bedside Medicine.对已批准的抗丙型肝炎病毒药物用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎感染的综合分子与临床研究:基础医学与临床医学之间的明显差距
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 22;11(3):515. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030515.
2
Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir or ravidasvir in patients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial.索磷布韦联合达拉他韦或拉维达韦治疗 COVID-19 患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6750-6759. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27264. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir versus the standard of care in adults hospitalized with COVID-19: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.索磷布韦/维帕他韦对比 COVID-19 住院成人标准治疗的疗效和安全性:一项单中心、随机对照试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jul 15;76(8):2158-2167. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab152.
4
Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/ ledipasvir in treatment of patients with COVID-19; A randomized clinical trial.索磷布韦/维帕他韦治疗 COVID-19 患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验。
Acta Biomed. 2020 Nov 10;91(4):e2020102. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4.10877.
5
Safety and efficacy of four drug regimens versus standard-of-care for the treatment of symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19: A randomised, open-label, multi-arm, phase 2 clinical trial.四种药物治疗方案与标准治疗相比用于治疗有症状的 COVID-19 门诊患者的安全性和有效性:一项随机、开放标签、多臂、2 期临床试验。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Dec;86:104322. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104322. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
6
Real-world effectiveness of daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir and velpatasvir/sofosbuvir in hepatitis C genotype 2 and 3.达卡他韦联合索非布韦和维帕他韦/索非布韦治疗丙型肝炎 2 型和 3 型的真实世界疗效。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
7
Comparative efficacy of sofosbuvir-ribavirin versus sofosbuvir-daclatasvir for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in an area with limited NS5A inhibitor availability.在NS5A抑制剂供应有限地区,索磷布韦-利巴韦林与索磷布韦-达卡他韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎的疗效比较
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov;37(6):520-525. doi: 10.1007/s12664-018-0921-2. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
8
Real-world cost-effectiveness of pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir combination versus genotype dependent directly acting anti-viral drugs for treatment of hepatitis C patients in the universal coverage scheme of Punjab state in India.印度旁遮普邦全民医保计划中泛基因型索磷布韦-维帕他韦联合方案与基于基因型的直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎患者的真实世界成本效益比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221769. eCollection 2019.
9
Cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir-based regimen for treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection in Canada.在加拿大,达卡他韦加索磷布韦方案治疗丙型肝炎病毒3型感染的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2016;19(2):181-92. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1106546. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
10
Real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir with or without ribavirin for genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan.在台湾,索磷布韦联合达拉他韦治疗基因 2 型慢性丙型肝炎的真实世界疗效和安全性:有无利巴韦林的比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 May;118(5):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
RNA Polymerase Inhibitor Enisamium for Treatment of Moderate COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Double-Blind Phase 3 Clinical Trial.RNA 聚合酶抑制剂恩沙替尼治疗中度 COVID-19 患者的随机、安慰剂对照、多中心、双盲 3 期临床试验。
Adv Respir Med. 2024 May 6;92(3):202-217. doi: 10.3390/arm92030021.

本文引用的文献

1
Ensitrelvir as a potential treatment for COVID-19.恩西他韦作为COVID-19的一种潜在治疗方法。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2022 Dec;23(18):1995-1998. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2146493. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
2
COVID-19 After Treatment With Direct-acting Antivirals for HCV Infection and Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Case Report.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗 HCV 感染和失代偿性肝硬化后 COVID-19:病例报告。
In Vivo. 2022 Jul-Aug;36(4):1986-1993. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12923.
3
Efficacy of Sofosbuvir plus Ledipasvir in Egyptian patients with COVID-19 compared to standard treatment: a randomized controlled trial.
索磷布韦联合利巴韦林治疗埃及 COVID-19 患者的疗效与标准治疗相比:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Life. 2022 Mar;15(3):350-358. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0175.
4
Favipiravir Inhibits Hepatitis A Virus Infection in Human Hepatocytes.法匹拉韦抑制人肝细胞中的甲型肝炎病毒感染。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 27;23(5):2631. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052631.
5
Clinical, Virological, Immunological, and Genomic Characterization of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Cases With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in India.印度无症状和有症状的 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的临床、病毒学、免疫学和基因组特征。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Dec 21;11:725035. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.725035. eCollection 2021.
6
Evaluation of the effect of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a randomized double-blind clinical trial (DISCOVER).评估索非布韦和达卡他韦在住院 COVID-19 患者中的疗效:一项随机、双盲临床试验(DISCOVER)。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Feb 23;77(3):758-766. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab433.
7
Telmisartan Restricts Chikungunya Virus Infection and through the AT1/PPAR-γ/MAPKs Pathways.替米沙坦通过 AT1/PPAR-γ/MAPKs 通路限制基孔肯雅病毒感染。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jan 18;66(1):e0148921. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01489-21. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
8
Favipiravir Versus Arbidol for Clinical Recovery Rate in Moderate and Severe Adult COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.法匹拉韦与阿比多尔治疗中重度成年 COVID-19 患者临床治愈率的前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 2;12:683296. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.683296. eCollection 2021.
9
Remdesivir and Ledipasvir among the FDA-Approved Antiviral Drugs Have Potential to Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Replication.瑞德西韦和来迪派韦等美国食品药品监督管理局批准的抗病毒药物具有抑制 SARS-CoV-2 复制的潜力。
Cells. 2021 Apr 29;10(5):1052. doi: 10.3390/cells10051052.
10
In vitro antiviral activity of the anti-HCV drugs daclatasvir and sofosbuvir against SARS-CoV-2, the aetiological agent of COVID-19.抗 HCV 药物达卡他韦和索非布韦对 COVID-19 病因 SARS-CoV-2 的体外抗病毒活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jun 18;76(7):1874-1885. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab072.