• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新农保是否降低了农村老年人的垃圾食品摄入量?来自中国的证据。

Has new rural pension system reduced the intake of junk food among rural older adults? Evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Business, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China.

School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;11:1131337. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1131337. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1131337
PMID:36992872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10040765/
Abstract

At present, China has become one of the fastest growing countries in terms of junk food consumption. However, there has been less previous evidence for the effect of endowment insurance on dietary health. Using the data China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2014, this paper exploits a policy, the New Rural Pension System (NRPS), that only the older adults who have reached 60 years old can receive pensions and conduct a fuzzy regression discontinuity (FRD) to address endogeneity and examine the causal effect of the NRPS on the intake of junk food among rural older adults in China. We find that the NRPS can significantly reduce junk food intake among them, which remains robust after a series of robustness tests. In addition, heterogeneity analysis shows that the female, low-educated, unemployed, and low-income groups are more sensitive to the pension shock from the NRPS. The result of our study provides insights to effectively improve people's dietary quality and related policy formulation.

摘要

目前,中国已成为垃圾食品消费增长最快的国家之一。然而,此前关于养老保险对饮食健康影响的证据较少。本文利用中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)2014 年的数据,利用一项仅允许年满 60 岁的老年人领取养老金的政策——新型农村社会养老保险(NRPS),采用模糊回归不连续设计(FRD)来解决内生性问题,并考察 NRPS 对中国农村老年人食用垃圾食品的因果效应。结果发现,NRPS 可以显著降低农村老年人食用垃圾食品的比例,这一结果在一系列稳健性检验后仍然成立。此外,异质性分析表明,女性、受教育程度低、失业和低收入群体对 NRPS 的养老金冲击更为敏感。本研究结果为有效提高人们的饮食质量和相关政策制定提供了启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d9/10040765/08e9b8d2eeff/fpubh-11-1131337-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d9/10040765/0ae3888dfbf7/fpubh-11-1131337-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d9/10040765/80e3e961067e/fpubh-11-1131337-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d9/10040765/08e9b8d2eeff/fpubh-11-1131337-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d9/10040765/0ae3888dfbf7/fpubh-11-1131337-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d9/10040765/80e3e961067e/fpubh-11-1131337-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d9/10040765/08e9b8d2eeff/fpubh-11-1131337-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Has new rural pension system reduced the intake of junk food among rural older adults? Evidence from China.新农保是否降低了农村老年人的垃圾食品摄入量?来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;11:1131337. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1131337. eCollection 2023.
2
Impact of pension income on healthcare utilization of older adults in rural China.养老金收入对中国农村老年人医疗利用的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Aug 26;22(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01985-5.
3
The impact of pension on the health behavior of elderly rural residents: evidence from China.养老金对农村老年人健康行为的影响:来自中国的证据。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 18;24(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04783-y.
4
The fertility effects of public pension: Evidence from the new rural pension scheme in China.公共养老金对生育的影响:来自中国新型农村社会养老保险的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234657. eCollection 2020.
5
Do the New Rural Pension Scheme promote the health status of chronic patients in old age? -Evidence from CHARLS 2018 in China.新农保是否能提高老年慢性病患者的健康状况?——来自中国 CHARLS2018 的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 14;23(1):2506. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17430-9.
6
Reducing Food Poverty and Vulnerability among the Rural Elderly with Chronic Diseases: The Role of the New Rural Pension Scheme in China.减少农村慢性病老年人口的食物贫困和脆弱性:中国新型农村社会养老保险的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 13;15(6):1253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061253.
7
Does money relieve depression? Evidence from social pension expansions in China.钱能缓解抑郁吗?来自中国社会养老金扩张的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:411-420. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
8
Do Public Pensions Improve Mental Wellbeing? Evidence from the New Rural Society Pension Insurance Program.公共养老金是否能改善心理健康?来自新型农村社会养老保险计划的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2391. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052391.
9
Do Social Pension Schemes Promote the Mental Health of Rural Middle-Aged and Old Residents? Evidence From China.社会养老金计划是否能促进农村中老年居民的心理健康?来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;9:710128. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.710128. eCollection 2021.
10
Who Are the Beneficiaries of China's New Rural Pension Scheme? Sons, Daughters, or Parents?谁是中国新型农村社会养老保险的受益者?儿子、女儿还是父母?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 29;16(17):3159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173159.

本文引用的文献

1
Pension exposure and health: Evidence from a longitudinal study in South Africa.养老金状况与健康:来自南非一项纵向研究的证据。
J Econ Ageing. 2022 Oct;23:None. doi: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2022.100411.
2
Health improvements of older adults based on benefit duration: Lessons from Korean social pension policies.基于受益期限的老年人健康改善:韩国社会养老金政策的经验教训。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;315:115514. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115514. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
3
Social Pension Scheme and Health Inequality: Evidence From China's New Rural Social Pension Scheme.
社会养老金计划与健康不平等:来自中国新型农村社会养老金计划的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 7;9:837431. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.837431. eCollection 2021.
4
Do Social Pension Schemes Promote the Mental Health of Rural Middle-Aged and Old Residents? Evidence From China.社会养老金计划是否能促进农村中老年居民的心理健康?来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;9:710128. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.710128. eCollection 2021.
5
Urban-Rural Inequality of Opportunity in Health Care: Evidence from China.城乡医疗机会不平等:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 22;18(15):7792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157792.
6
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 87 种风险因素的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.
7
Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review.超加工食品与健康结局:一项叙述性综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 30;12(7):1955. doi: 10.3390/nu12071955.
8
Global diet and health: old questions, fresh evidence, and new horizons.全球饮食与健康:老问题、新证据与新视野。
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1916-1918. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30500-8. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.195 个国家 1990 年至 2017 年饮食风险对健康的影响:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Nutrition quality of food purchases varies by household income: the SHoPPER study.家庭收入影响食物购买的营养质量:SHoPPER 研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6546-2.