Suppr超能文献

测量老年人的人格系统:荷兰版BIS/BAS问卷的年龄中立性

Measuring Personality Systems in Older Adults: Age-Neutrality of the Dutch BIS/BAS Questionnaire.

作者信息

Derksen Sophie A, Brancart Xenia, Rossi Gina

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Personality and Psychopathology Research Group (PEPS), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Mar 23;16:949-961. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S394510. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With a rapidly aging population, age-neutrality of psychological instruments is becoming ever more important for accurate assessment of older adults. This study aims to test the age-neutrality of the Dutch Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Approach System (BIS/BAS) scales by means of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and Differential Test Functioning (DTF) analyses.

METHODS

DIF and DTF analyses were conducted using an odds ratio approach. Potential DIF was examined for the two primary scales and three BAS subscales in 390 Dutch-speaking participants divided over three age groups.

RESULTS

Overall, the BIS-BAS scales lacked age-neutrality when comparing older adults to young adults: eight out of 20 items (ie, 40%) displayed DIF according to the adjusted Bonferroni corrected cut-offs, which exceeds the threshold of 25% for large DIF. Thus, for 40% of the test items, items were differently endorsed by young and older adults with the same position on the construct measured by the item. Therefore, the implications of the item-level DIF on the scale level were investigated across age groups. DTF analyses revealed large DTF for all BIS and BAS scales according to the adjusted Bonferroni corrected cut-offs.

DISCUSSION

DIF found in items on the BIS scale and BAS-Drive and BAS-Fun Seeking scale can probably be explained by a difference in degree of expression across age groups. A solution could be the development of age-specific norms. DIF on BAS-Reward Responsiveness subscale could be partly due to measuring a different construct across age groups. Rephrasing or replacing such items with DIF may increase age-neutrality of the BIS/BAS Scales.

摘要

引言

随着人口迅速老龄化,心理测量工具的年龄中立性对于准确评估老年人变得越来越重要。本研究旨在通过差异项目功能(DIF)和差异测验功能(DTF)分析来检验荷兰行为抑制系统/行为激活系统(BIS/BAS)量表的年龄中立性。

方法

采用优势比方法进行DIF和DTF分析。在390名讲荷兰语的参与者中,对三个年龄组的两个主要量表和三个BAS子量表进行了潜在DIF检验。

结果

总体而言,将老年人与年轻人进行比较时,BIS-BAS量表缺乏年龄中立性:根据调整后的Bonferroni校正临界值,20个项目中有8个(即40%)显示出DIF,超过了大DIF的25%阈值。因此,对于40%的测试项目,年轻人和老年人对该项目所测量的结构具有相同位置的认可方式不同。因此,在各年龄组中研究了项目层面DIF对量表层面的影响。DTF分析显示,根据调整后的Bonferroni校正临界值,所有BIS和BAS量表都存在较大的DTF。

讨论

在BIS量表、BAS-驱力量表和BAS-寻求乐趣量表上发现的DIF可能可以通过不同年龄组表达程度的差异来解释。一种解决方案可能是制定特定年龄的常模。BAS-奖励反应性子量表上的DIF可能部分是由于不同年龄组测量的结构不同。重新措辞或替换存在DIF的此类项目可能会提高BIS/BAS量表的年龄中立性。

相似文献

1
Measuring Personality Systems in Older Adults: Age-Neutrality of the Dutch BIS/BAS Questionnaire.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Mar 23;16:949-961. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S394510. eCollection 2023.
3
[A study of temperament and personality in children diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)].
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 May 26.
4
Measuring Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation in Older Adults: Construct Validity of the Dutch BIS/BAS Scales.
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):1061-1074. doi: 10.1177/10731911211000123. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Age-neutrality of the SCID-II: Differential Item Functioning in Younger Outpatients (Aged 20-45) and Older Outpatients (Aged 65+).
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Jul-Sep;46(4):532-543. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2102457. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
6
Age-Neutral Measurement Of Personality Functioning and Maladaptive Personality Traits.
Assessment. 2025 Jan;32(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/10731911241240626. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
9
Age neutrality of the young schema questionnaire in patients with a substance use disorder.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Aug;26(8):1317-26. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000519. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
10
Age-Neutrality of a Brief Assessment of the Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in Older Adults.
Assessment. 2018 Apr;25(3):310-323. doi: 10.1177/1073191118754706. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation in Older Adults: Construct Validity of the Dutch BIS/BAS Scales.
Assessment. 2022 Jul;29(5):1061-1074. doi: 10.1177/10731911211000123. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Age-Neutrality of a Brief Assessment of the Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in Older Adults.
Assessment. 2018 Apr;25(3):310-323. doi: 10.1177/1073191118754706. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
4
Editorial: Journal article reporting standards.
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):1-2. doi: 10.1037/amp0000263.
5
Development of a Response Inconsistency Scale for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
J Pers Assess. 2016 Jul-Aug;98(4):351-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1158719. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
7
Personality assessment among older adults: the value of personality questionnaires unraveled.
Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(8):936-40. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.924089. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
8
Guidelines for psychological practice with older adults.
Am Psychol. 2014 Jan;69(1):34-65. doi: 10.1037/a0035063.
9
Differential patterns of nucleus accumbens activation during anticipation of monetary and social reward in young and older adults.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jun;9(6):825-31. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst047. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验