Suppr超能文献

SCID-II 的年龄中性:年轻门诊患者(20-45 岁)和老年门诊患者(65 岁以上)的差异项目功能。

Age-neutrality of the SCID-II: Differential Item Functioning in Younger Outpatients (Aged 20-45) and Older Outpatients (Aged 65+).

机构信息

Clinical Centre of Excellence for Personality Disorders in Older Adults, Mondriaan Mental Health Center, Heerlen-Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department Psychology (PE), Personality and Psychopathology Research group (PEPS), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Gerontol. 2023 Jul-Sep;46(4):532-543. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2102457. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Measurements are often developed for the assessment of personality disorders (PDs) in younger adults and seldom evaluated on the applicability in older adults. Remarkably, research has not yet been conducted into age-group appropriateness of the gold standard for the assessment of PDs, known as Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Therefore, the current study empirically investigated the age-neutrality of the PDs assessed by the SCID-II.

METHODS

Age-neutrality was examined in 84 younger adults (aged 20-45 years) and 68 older adults (aged 65-85) by Differential Item Functioning (DIF). The impact of DIF on scale level was further examined using Differential Test Functioning analyzes to examine the impact of the amount of DIF variance in the items on scale level.

RESULTS

Overall, the great majority, 95.8% of the categorically measured items and 87.5% of the dimensionally measured items, was endorsed in the same way by younger adults and older adults with equal scores on the PD scale. Subsequent analyzes revealed no large DTF for PD scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall the SCID-II in an outpatient population is age-neutral for both categorically and dimensionally scored PD scales.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The SCID-II can be used for the assessment of PDs in older adults.

摘要

目的

人格障碍(PD)的评估通常是针对年轻成年人进行的,很少评估其在老年成年人中的适用性。值得注意的是,尚未针对 PD 评估的金标准,即 DSM-IV 人格障碍的结构临床访谈(SCID-II),进行年龄分组适用性的研究。因此,目前的研究通过实证研究来检验 SCID-II 评估的 PD 是否具有年龄中立性。

方法

通过差异项目功能(DIF),在 84 名年轻成年人(20-45 岁)和 68 名老年成年人(65-85 岁)中检验年龄中立性。使用差异测试功能分析进一步检验 DIF 对量表水平的影响,以检验项目中的 DIF 方差量对量表水平的影响。

结果

总体而言,绝大多数,95.8%的分类测量项目和 87.5%的维度测量项目,在具有相同 PD 量表得分的年轻成年人和老年成年人中以相同的方式得到认可。随后的分析显示,PD 量表没有大的 DTF。

结论

总体而言,在门诊人群中,SCID-II 对于分类和维度评分的 PD 量表都是年龄中立的。

临床意义

SCID-II 可用于老年成年人的 PD 评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验