• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初级保健中更安全地使用西酞普兰:员工教育和处方提示能否提高对国家指南的依从性?一项闭环临床审计、服务评估和质量改进研究。

Safer citalopram use in primary care: Can staff education and prescribing prompts improve adherence to national guidance? A closed loop clinical audit, service evaluation and quality improvement study.

作者信息

Waller Mark

机构信息

GPST3 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Nov;11(11):7085-7088. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_772_22. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_772_22
PMID:36993121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10041297/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Citalopram is a drug with many important safety considerations in prescribing including dosage adjustments, pre-prescription testing and multiple interactions. Because of this, the UK government issued advice regarding the prescription of citalopram and escitalopram in its Drug Safety Update Vol 5 Issue 5, Dec 2011,[1] and the expectation is that all prescribers adhere to this.

PURPOSE/AIM: To establish the adherence to prescribing guidance of citalopram at the practice level, implement change to address the lack of adherence and then evaluate the effectiveness of the change using re-audit techniques.

METHODS

Patients were identified using data searching techniques on EMIS for February-April 2020. Parameters searched for included age, hepatic impairment, cardiac disease, known QT prolongation and concomitant use with other QT-prolonging medication. Following the first cycle teaching on the safer use of citalopram was delivered to all prescribers and an EMIS prompt was also set up. A second audit cycle was then carried out. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software to assess the significance of the results.

RESULTS

Following the presentation of the first cycle findings and the introduction of the EMIS safety prompt, there was a statistically significant reduction in incorrect citalopram dose prescription in the over 65s (8 vs 1), a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of dangerous drug interactions involving citalopram (44 vs 8) and a significant reduction in the incidence of unsafe prescribing of citalopram overall (47 vs 9).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of an EMIS prompt and one-off prescriber teaching resulted in a statistically significant reduction in incorrect prescriptions of citalopram when re-audited a year later. These interventions resulted in improved patient safety and more effective use of resources and could easily be replicated at other practices throughout the country both for citalopram and other drugs with multiple safety considerations.

摘要

背景

西酞普兰是一种在处方开具时存在诸多重要安全考量的药物,包括剂量调整、处方前检测以及多种相互作用。正因如此,英国政府在其2011年12月的《药物安全更新》第5卷第5期[1]中发布了关于西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰处方的建议,期望所有开处方者都能遵守。

目的

在实践层面确定对西酞普兰处方指南的遵守情况,实施变革以解决缺乏遵守的问题,然后使用重新审核技术评估变革的效果。

方法

在2020年2月至4月期间,利用EMIS上的数据搜索技术识别患者。搜索的参数包括年龄、肝功能损害、心脏病、已知的QT间期延长以及与其他延长QT间期药物的联合使用情况。在第一个周期之后,向所有开处方者提供了关于更安全使用西酞普兰的培训,并设置了EMIS提示。然后进行了第二个审核周期。使用社会科学统计软件对数据进行分析,以评估结果的显著性。

结果

在展示第一个周期的结果并引入EMIS安全提示后,65岁以上人群中西酞普兰剂量处方错误有统计学意义的减少(从8例降至1例),涉及西酞普兰的危险药物相互作用发生率有统计学意义的降低(从44例降至8例),西酞普兰总体不安全处方发生率显著降低(从47例降至9例)。

结论

引入EMIS提示和一次性的开处方者培训,在一年后重新审核时,西酞普兰的错误处方有统计学意义的减少。这些干预措施提高了患者安全性,使资源得到更有效利用,并且对于西酞普兰以及其他有多种安全考量的药物而言,在全国其他医疗机构中都能轻松复制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b43/10041297/ae0760ede20b/JFMPC-11-7085-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b43/10041297/8e5d4ba320e3/JFMPC-11-7085-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b43/10041297/ae0760ede20b/JFMPC-11-7085-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b43/10041297/8e5d4ba320e3/JFMPC-11-7085-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b43/10041297/ae0760ede20b/JFMPC-11-7085-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Safer citalopram use in primary care: Can staff education and prescribing prompts improve adherence to national guidance? A closed loop clinical audit, service evaluation and quality improvement study.在初级保健中更安全地使用西酞普兰:员工教育和处方提示能否提高对国家指南的依从性?一项闭环临床审计、服务评估和质量改进研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Nov;11(11):7085-7088. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_772_22. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
2
The effectiveness and limitations of regulatory warnings for the safe prescribing of citalopram.西酞普兰安全处方监管警告的有效性和局限性。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2015 Aug 19;7:139-45. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S91046. eCollection 2015.
3
4
Impact of hospital pharmacist interventions on the combination of citalopram or escitalopram with other QT-prolonging drugs.医院药剂师干预对西酞普兰或艾司西酞普兰与其他可延长QT间期药物联用的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):42-48. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0724-7. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Antidepressant Controlled Trial For Negative Symptoms In Schizophrenia (ACTIONS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial.精神分裂症阴性症状的抗抑郁药对照试验(ACTIONS):一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(29):1-46. doi: 10.3310/hta20290.
6
IMPACT OF A COMPUTERISED OUTPATIENT PRESCRIPTION PRINTING SYSTEM (COPPS) ON MELATONIN PRESCRIBING IN A COMMUNITY CHILD HEALTH CLINIC.计算机化门诊处方打印系统(COPPS)对社区儿童健康诊所褪黑素处方的影响
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Sep;101(9):e2. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311535.50.
7
Health Canada Warning on Citalopram and Escitalopram--Its Effects on Prescribing in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry.加拿大卫生部关于西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰的警告——及其对会诊联络精神病学处方的影响。
Psychosomatics. 2016 Jan-Feb;57(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
Electronically delivered interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections in primary care: cluster RCT using electronic health records and cohort study.电子干预措施减少初级保健中呼吸道感染抗生素处方:使用电子健康记录的群组 RCT 和队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(11):1-70. doi: 10.3310/hta23110.
9
[Effect of the direct healthcare professional communication on citalopram and escitalopram drug utilization for inpatient treatment of anxiety disorders].[直接医疗专业人员沟通对西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰用于焦虑症住院治疗的药物使用情况的影响]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Nov;65(11):1204-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03594-z. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
10
Unintended Consequences of Adjusting Citalopram Prescriptions Following the 2011 FDA Warning.2011年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发出警告后调整西酞普兰处方的意外后果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;25(4):407-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiac Toxicity in Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Users.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂使用者的心脏毒性
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2015 Dec;36(4):293-7. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000205.
2
The effectiveness and limitations of regulatory warnings for the safe prescribing of citalopram.西酞普兰安全处方监管警告的有效性和局限性。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2015 Aug 19;7:139-45. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S91046. eCollection 2015.
3
Citalopram and cardiac toxicity.西酞普兰与心脏毒性。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;69(4):755-60. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1408-1. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
4
Comparison of citalopram and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ingestions in children.比较西酞普兰和其他选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在儿童中的摄入情况。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2012 Jun;50(5):418-23. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2012.678497. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
5
Effect of age and gender on citalopram and desmethylcitalopram steady-state plasma concentrations in adults and elderly depressed patients.年龄和性别对成人及老年抑郁症患者中西酞普兰和去甲基西酞普兰稳态血浆浓度的影响。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;29(6):952-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.06.001.
6
Citalopram versus sertraline in late-life nonmajor clinically significant depression: a 1-year follow-up clinical trial.西酞普兰与舍曲林治疗老年非重度临床显著抑郁症的1年随访临床试验
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;66(3):360-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0313.
7
Relative toxicity of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in overdose.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)过量服用时的相对毒性。
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(3):277-85. doi: 10.1081/clt-120037428.
8
Dose response relationship of citalopram 20 mg, citalopram 40 mg and placebo in the treatment of moderate and severe depression.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1992 Jun;6 Suppl 5:65-70. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199206005-00007.