Sharma Pradeep, Sood Rajan, Sharma Mukul, Gupta Arun K, Chauhan Arun
Department of General Surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Department of General Surgery, MM Medical College and Hospital, Kumarhatti-Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Dec;11(12):7686-7690. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_624_22. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
Acute abdomen is the most commonly attended surgical emergency. It can be caused by intra-abdominal, extra-abdominal and metabolic causes. A few imaging modalities are at disposal of primary care physicians like plain x-ray and ultrasonography.
This study has been done to compare the efficacy of clinical diagnosis, plain radiography and sonography in diagnosis of non-traumatic acute abdomen. Every patient under study admitted in the Department of General Surgery underwent thorough clinical evaluation, biochemical investigations, X-rays and sonography. Findings of clinical evaluation, X-Rays and sonography were compared to the final diagnosis found intraoperatively.
Clinical diagnosis was made in 47 (94%) out of 50 patients. X-rays were able to diagnose in 20 patients (40%) whereas sonography diagnosed 26 patients (52%).
The present study showed that clinical evaluation, x-rays or Ultrasound alone are not sufficient to diagnose cause of non-traumatic acute abdomen in all cases. Clinical evaluation combined with x-rays and ultrasound increases the number and accuracy of pre-operative diagnosis in non-traumatic acute abdomen.
急腹症是最常见的外科急症。它可由腹内、腹外及代谢性原因引起。基层医疗医生可使用一些成像方式,如普通X线和超声检查。
本研究旨在比较临床诊断、普通X线摄影及超声检查在非创伤性急腹症诊断中的效能。普外科收治的每例研究患者均接受了全面的临床评估、生化检查、X线检查及超声检查。将临床评估、X线检查及超声检查的结果与术中最终诊断结果进行比较。
50例患者中有47例(94%)作出了临床诊断。X线检查能够诊断出20例患者(40%),而超声检查诊断出26例患者(52%)。
本研究表明,单独的临床评估、X线检查或超声检查在所有病例中都不足以诊断非创伤性急腹症的病因。临床评估结合X线检查和超声检查可增加非创伤性急腹症术前诊断的数量和准确性。