Janssens J, Vantrappen G, Ghillebert G
Gastroenterology. 1986 Jun;90(6):1978-84. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90270-2.
Sixty patients with anginalike chest pain of noncardiac origin were studied to determine the diagnostic value of 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH and pressure monitoring. The results of these 24-h studies were compared with those obtained by established methods, including x-rays, endoscopy with biopsy, conventional esophageal manometry, and acid perfusion test. Esophageal origin of the chest pain was considered to be likely if the familiar pain sensation was reproduced by the acid perfusion test, or if the pain occurred during an episode of gastroesophageal reflux, severe motor disorders, or both. When the results of established methods were combined and interpreted according to predetermined criteria, esophageal origin of the pain was shown to be likely in 27% of the patients. The 24-h recordings, alone, showed the esophagus to be the likely cause of the pain in 35% of the patients. Combination of all conventional examinations and of 24-h recordings made esophageal origin of the pain likely in 48% of the patients.
对60例非心脏源性心绞痛样胸痛患者进行了研究,以确定24小时动态食管pH值和压力监测的诊断价值。将这些24小时研究的结果与通过既定方法获得的结果进行比较,这些方法包括X线检查、内镜活检、传统食管测压和酸灌注试验。如果酸灌注试验再现了熟悉的疼痛感觉,或者疼痛发生在胃食管反流、严重运动障碍或两者发作期间,则认为胸痛可能源于食管。当根据预定标准对既定方法的结果进行综合和解释时,27%的患者显示疼痛可能源于食管。仅24小时记录显示,35%的患者食管可能是疼痛的原因。所有传统检查和24小时记录相结合,使48%的患者疼痛可能源于食管。