Fang Tianyi, Yin Xin, Wang Yufei, Zhang Lei, Wang Yimin, Zhang Xinghai, Zhao Xudong, Lin Xuan, Xue Yingwei
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Department of Pathology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 20;9(3):e14669. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14669. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The serum factors of inflammation are known to be useful prognostic indicators of gastric cancer (GC). However, few studies have made comparisons to screen out more suitable biomarkers for the construction of Nomogram models. In this study, 566 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy were randomly selected. We evaluated the prognostic value of markers of systemic inflammation, including WBC, NLR, PLR, circulating total T cells, CD4T cells, CD8T cells and CD19B cells, serum IgA, IgM, IgE and IgG, and compared them with traditional tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA125). Kaplan‒Meier analysis was used to analyze the correlation between biomarkers and overall survival (OS). We used time-dependent ROC analysis to investigate the prognostic accuracy of each biomarker. The risk of death was evaluated by the Cox regression model, and the Nomogram model was constructed by R software. We found that circulating total T cells, CD8T cells, CEA, and CA125 had statistical significance in predicting advanced GC prognosis. Circulating CD8T cells and CA125 were continuously superior to circulating total T cells and CEA in the prediction of 5-year OS. Cox regression found that CA125, circulating CD8T cells, sex, and lymph node metastasis rate were independent risk factors for advanced GC. Furthermore, we combined all these predictors to construct a nomogram, which can supplement the AJCC 8th system. According to the comparison with commonly used serum immune biomarkers, circulating CD8T cells is more sensitive to advanced GC. The prediction function of the Nomogram will supplement the traditional AJCC system, which contributes to individual survival prediction.
炎症血清因子是已知的胃癌(GC)有用的预后指标。然而,很少有研究进行比较以筛选出更合适的生物标志物用于构建列线图模型。在本研究中,随机选择了566例行根治性胃切除术的患者。我们评估了全身炎症标志物的预后价值,包括白细胞、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、循环总T细胞、CD4T细胞、CD8T细胞和CD19B细胞、血清免疫球蛋白A(IgA)、免疫球蛋白M(IgM)、免疫球蛋白E(IgE)和免疫球蛋白G(IgG),并将它们与传统肿瘤标志物(癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖类抗原72-4(CA72-4)和糖类抗原125(CA125))进行比较。采用Kaplan-Meier分析来分析生物标志物与总生存期(OS)之间的相关性。我们使用时间依赖性ROC分析来研究每个生物标志物的预后准确性。通过Cox回归模型评估死亡风险,并使用R软件构建列线图模型。我们发现循环总T细胞、CD8T细胞、CEA和CA125在预测进展期GC预后方面具有统计学意义。在预测5年总生存期方面,循环CD8T细胞和CA125持续优于循环总T细胞和CEA。Cox回归发现CA125、循环CD8T细胞、性别和淋巴结转移率是进展期GC的独立危险因素。此外,我们将所有这些预测因素结合起来构建了一个列线图,它可以补充美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版系统。根据与常用血清免疫生物标志物的比较,循环CD8T细胞对进展期GC更敏感。列线图的预测功能将补充传统的AJCC系统,这有助于个体生存预测。