Suppr超能文献

急性胰腺炎合并肠系膜静脉血栓形成:单中心治疗适应证、方法及转归的回顾性研究。

Splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: a review of treatment indications, methods, and outcomes in a single institution.

机构信息

General Surgery Unit, Royal Perth Hospital WA, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

General Surgery Unit, Armadale Health Service WA, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2023 Oct;93(10):2487-2491. doi: 10.1111/ans.18442. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a well-recognized complication of acute pancreatitis. The question of whether or not to treat SVT with systemic therapeutic anticoagulation (STA) remains to be seen. The universal use of anticoagulation may lead to an increased risk of bleeding complications associated with acute pancreatitis. Literature on this subject is sparse and there is no clear guideline on how to treat SVT. Our research demonstrates local practice where therapeutic anticoagulation in SVT varies.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients presenting with acute pancreatitis admitted over a five-year period to a single tertiary hospital with splanchnic vein thrombosis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 1408 patients admitted with acute pancreatitis, 42 were diagnosed with splanchnic vein thrombosis, with a male dominance of 34 (81%). A total of 25 patients received anticoagulation. The use of anticoagulation was dependent on the location of the thrombus, P < 0.01. Anticoagulation use was most common in cases of combination mesenteric, splenic, and portal vein thrombus (100%), isolated mesenteric vein (100%), isolated portal vein (89%), combination portal and splenic vein (87%), and combination mesenteric and splenic vein (75%). The rate of anticoagulation use was lowest in isolated splenic vein thrombus (23%).

CONCLUSION

The early commencement of STA in patients with acute pancreatitis and triple-vessel SVT or with portal vein involvement is supported by our data. Isolated splenic vein thrombus does not require systemic therapy. Further research is needed to establish a clear clinical guideline.

摘要

背景

肠系膜静脉血栓形成(SVT)是急性胰腺炎的一种公认并发症。是否应通过全身治疗性抗凝(STA)来治疗 SVT 仍存在争议。抗凝的广泛应用可能会导致与急性胰腺炎相关的出血并发症风险增加。关于这个主题的文献很少,也没有明确的指南说明如何治疗 SVT。我们的研究表明,SVT 中的治疗性抗凝在局部实践中存在差异。

方法

对一家三级医院在五年期间收治的患有急性胰腺炎并伴有肠系膜静脉血栓形成的患者进行了回顾性研究。

结果

在 1408 名因急性胰腺炎入院的患者中,有 42 名被诊断为肠系膜静脉血栓形成,其中男性占 34 名(81%)。共有 25 名患者接受了抗凝治疗。抗凝的使用取决于血栓的位置,P 值<0.01。在肠系膜、脾和门静脉血栓形成的组合病例中(100%)、孤立性肠系膜静脉血栓形成(100%)、孤立性门静脉血栓形成(89%)、门静脉和脾静脉的组合(87%)和肠系膜和脾静脉的组合(75%)中,抗凝的使用最常见。孤立性脾静脉血栓形成(23%)的抗凝使用率最低。

结论

我们的数据支持在急性胰腺炎患者中早期开始 STA 的治疗,对于三血管 SVT 或伴有门静脉受累的患者,应早期开始 STA。孤立性脾静脉血栓形成不需要全身治疗。需要进一步研究以建立明确的临床指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验