Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(6):1421-8.
BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine the color alterations of natural teeth associated with different orthodontic composites used in comprehensive short-term treatment.
Twenty-two patients were treated with fixed appliances and 22 untreated subjects were also evaluated. Lower incisors were bonded with different orthodontic composites: 42 with Grengloo, 41 with Light Bond, 31 with Kurasper F, and 32 with Transbond XT. The color parameters of the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) were measured for each tooth with a spectrophotometer. Color assessment in relation to time, adhesive material, and their interaction was made with 2-way mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 1-way ANOVA for the color differences (ΔE*). Further analyses were done using Tukey's honestly significant difference tests and paired-samples t-tests.
The color of teeth was affected by treatment. The mean L* and a* values increased, whereas the mean b* values decreased. Total color differences of teeth demonstrated visible color changes clinically after treatment, ranging from 1.12 to 3.34 ΔE units. However, there were no significant differences for color of enamel.
Teeth may be discolored with fixed appliances during treatment. Moreover, contemporary orthodontic composites have similar effects of enamel discoloration.
背景/目的:确定与综合短期治疗中使用的不同正畸复合材料相关的天然牙齿颜色变化。
22 名患者接受固定矫治器治疗,同时评估 22 名未接受治疗的患者。在下切牙上粘结不同的正畸复合材料:42 颗用 Grengloo,41 颗用 Light Bond,31 颗用 Kurasper F,32 颗用 Transbond XT。用分光光度计测量每个牙齿的国际照明委员会(CIE)颜色参数。使用双向混合方差分析(ANOVA)和颜色差异(ΔE*)的单向 ANOVA 对与时间、粘结材料及其相互作用的颜色评估进行分析。进一步的分析使用 Tukey 的诚实显着差异检验和配对样本 t 检验。
治疗会影响牙齿的颜色。L和 a值的平均值增加,而 b*值的平均值降低。牙齿的总颜色差异在治疗后临床上显示出明显的颜色变化,范围从 1.12 到 3.34ΔE 单位。然而,牙釉质的颜色没有显著差异。
固定矫治器治疗期间牙齿可能会变色。此外,现代正畸复合材料对牙釉质变色具有相似的影响。