• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录捕捉主要结局指标:两项艾滋病预防研究中的案例研究。

Electronic health records to capture primary outcome measures: two case studies in HIV prevention research.

机构信息

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Mar 31;24(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07264-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07264-6
PMID:36997941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10063429/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in the use of electronic health records (EHRs) to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of clinical trials, including the capture of outcome measures.

MAIN TEXT

We describe our experience of using EHRs to capture the primary outcome measure - HIV infection or the diagnosis of HIV infection - in two randomised HIV prevention trials conducted in the UK. PROUD was a clinic-based trial evaluating pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and SELPHI was an internet-based trial evaluating HIV self-testing kits. The EHR was the national database of HIV diagnoses in the UK, curated by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). In PROUD, linkage to the UKHSA database was performed at the end of the trial and identified five primary outcomes in addition to the 30 outcomes diagnosed by the participating clinics. Linkage also produced an additional 345 person-years follow-up, an increase of 27% over clinic-based follow-up. In SELPHI, new HIV diagnoses were primarily identified via UKHSA linkage, complemented by participant self-report through internet surveys. Rates of survey completion were low, and only 14 of the 33 new diagnoses recorded in the UKHSA database were also self-reported. Thus UKHSA linkage was essential for capturing HIV diagnoses and the successful conduct of the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience of using the UKHSA database of HIV diagnoses as a source of primary outcomes in two randomised trials in the field of HIV prevention was highly favourable and encourages the use of a similar approach in future trials in this disease area.

摘要

背景

越来越多的人对使用电子健康记录 (EHR) 来提高临床试验的效率和成本效益感兴趣,包括捕获结果测量。

主要文本

我们描述了我们在两项在英国进行的随机 HIV 预防试验中使用 EHR 来捕获主要结局指标 - HIV 感染或 HIV 感染诊断的经验。PROUD 是一项评估暴露前预防 (PrEP) 的基于诊所的试验,SELPHI 是一项评估 HIV 自我检测试剂盒的基于互联网的试验。EHR 是英国的国家 HIV 诊断数据库,由英国卫生安全局 (UKHSA) 管理。在 PROUD 中,在试验结束时对 UKHSA 数据库进行了链接,除了由参与诊所诊断的 30 个结局外,还确定了五个主要结局。链接还产生了额外的 345 人年随访,比基于诊所的随访增加了 27%。在 SELPHI 中,新的 HIV 诊断主要通过 UKHSA 链接识别,通过互联网调查的参与者自我报告补充。调查完成率较低,在 UKHSA 数据库中记录的 33 个新诊断中,仅有 14 个是自我报告的。因此,UKHSA 链接对于捕获 HIV 诊断和成功进行试验至关重要。

结论

我们在 HIV 预防领域的两项随机试验中使用 UKHSA 艾滋病毒诊断数据库作为主要结局指标来源的经验非常有利,并鼓励在该疾病领域的未来试验中采用类似方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf4/10064773/04bc6baddd77/13063_2023_7264_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf4/10064773/bc227748c813/13063_2023_7264_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf4/10064773/ec822569c546/13063_2023_7264_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf4/10064773/04bc6baddd77/13063_2023_7264_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf4/10064773/bc227748c813/13063_2023_7264_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf4/10064773/ec822569c546/13063_2023_7264_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bf4/10064773/04bc6baddd77/13063_2023_7264_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Electronic health records to capture primary outcome measures: two case studies in HIV prevention research.电子健康记录捕捉主要结局指标:两项艾滋病预防研究中的案例研究。
Trials. 2023 Mar 31;24(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07264-6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Protocol, rationale and design of SELPHI: a randomised controlled trial assessing whether offering free HIV self-testing kits via the internet increases the rate of HIV diagnosis.SELPHI 研究方案、原理和设计:一项随机对照试验,旨在评估通过互联网提供免费 HIV 自我检测试剂盒是否能提高 HIV 诊断率。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3433-x.
4
Free HIV self-test for identification and linkage to care of previously undetected HIV infection in men who have sex with men in England and Wales (SELPHI): an open-label, internet-based, randomised controlled trial.在英格兰和威尔士,针对男男性行为者的 HIV 自我检测以发现和转介既往未检出的 HIV 感染:一项开放标签、基于互联网的随机对照试验(SELPHI)。
Lancet HIV. 2022 Dec;9(12):e838-e847. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00266-1.
5
An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis.暴露前预防的开放标签随机试验——PROUD研究的基线数据分析
Trials. 2016 Mar 24;17:163. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4.
6
Multilevel Intervention to Support Tailored and Responsive HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care in Rural North Carolina: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.北卡罗来纳州农村地区支持定制化和响应式HIV暴露前预防护理的多层次干预:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 21;14:e68085. doi: 10.2196/68085.
7
Implementation and Evaluation of a Home-Based Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Monitoring Option: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于家庭的暴露前预防监测方案的实施和评估:一项随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 23;13:e56587. doi: 10.2196/56587.
8
Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial.暴露前预防以预防HIV-1感染(PROUD):一项实用开放标签随机试验试点阶段的有效性结果
Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):53-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00056-2. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
9
The effect of combination prevention strategies on HIV incidence among gay and bisexual men who have sex with men in the UK: a model-based analysis.联合预防策略对英国男男性行为者中 HIV 发病率的影响:基于模型的分析。
Lancet HIV. 2023 Nov;10(11):e713-e722. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00204-7.
10
HIV-1 self-testing to improve the efficiency of pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery: a randomized trial in Kenya.HIV-1 自我检测以提高暴露前预防措施的提供效率:肯尼亚的一项随机试验。
Trials. 2019 Jul 4;20(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3521-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Linkage of Clinical Trial Data to Routinely Collected Data Sources: A Scoping Review.临床试验数据与常规收集数据源的关联:一项范围综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e257797. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7797.
2
Assessing Whether Providing Regular, Free HIV Self-Testing Kits Reduces the Time to HIV Diagnosis: An Internet-Based, Randomized Controlled Trial in Men Who Have Sex With Men.评估提供定期免费HIV自我检测试剂盒是否能缩短HIV诊断时间:一项针对男男性行为者的基于互联网的随机对照试验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Mar 1;98(3):274-281. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003564. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Regulatory Issues in Electronic Health Records for Adolescent HIV Research: Strategies and Lessons Learned.

本文引用的文献

1
Free HIV self-test for identification and linkage to care of previously undetected HIV infection in men who have sex with men in England and Wales (SELPHI): an open-label, internet-based, randomised controlled trial.在英格兰和威尔士,针对男男性行为者的 HIV 自我检测以发现和转介既往未检出的 HIV 感染:一项开放标签、基于互联网的随机对照试验(SELPHI)。
Lancet HIV. 2022 Dec;9(12):e838-e847. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00266-1.
2
Data provenance and integrity of health-care systems data for clinical trials.临床试验医疗保健系统数据的数据来源与完整性。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Aug;4(8):e567-e568. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00122-4.
3
青少年艾滋病病毒研究电子健康记录中的监管问题:策略与经验教训
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 2;8:e46420. doi: 10.2196/46420.
A narrative review on the validity of electronic health record-based research in epidemiology.
基于电子健康记录的流行病学研究的有效性的叙述性综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01416-5.
4
Clinical trial site identification practices and the use of electronic health records in feasibility evaluations: An interview study in the Nordic countries.临床试验地点识别实践以及电子健康记录在可行性评估中的应用:北欧国家的一项访谈研究
Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;18(6):724-731. doi: 10.1177/17407745211038512. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
Realising the full potential of data-enabled trials in the UK: a call for action.挖掘英国数据驱动型试验的全部潜力:行动呼吁。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e043906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043906.
6
Using digital technologies in clinical trials: Current and future applications.在临床试验中使用数字技术:当前和未来的应用。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jan;100:106219. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106219. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Five analytic challenges in working with electronic health records data to support clinical trials with some solutions.利用电子健康记录数据支持临床试验的 5 个分析挑战及部分解决方案。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):370-376. doi: 10.1177/1740774520931211. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
The APPROACH trial: Assessing pain, patient-reported outcomes, and complementary and integrative health.APPROACH 试验:评估疼痛、患者报告的结局和补充与整合健康。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):351-359. doi: 10.1177/1740774520928399. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials - review of successful data requests to UK registries.获取常规收集的临床试验健康数据 - 对英国注册机构成功的数据请求进行审查。
Trials. 2020 May 12;21(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04329-8.
10
Effect of Internet-Distributed HIV Self-tests on HIV Diagnosis and Behavioral Outcomes in Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Randomized Clinical Trial.互联网分发 HIV 自检对男男性行为者 HIV 诊断和行为结果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jan 1;180(1):117-125. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5222.