Lorensini Scott, Prakash Shivesh, McNeill David, Spencer Neil, Bihari Shailesh
Department of ICCU, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5062, Australia.
Department of Cardiology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5062, Australia.
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Mar 27;5(4):e0880. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000880. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Passive leg raise (PLR) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is simple and noninvasive maneuver, which can potentially improve patient-related outcomes. Initial CPR guidelines have previously advocated "elevation of the lower extremities to augment artificial circulation during CPR." There is lack of supporting evidence for this recommendation.
This was a double cross-over physiologic efficacy randomized study.
Study in 10 subjects with in-hospital cardiac arrest for whom CPR was undertaken.
Subjects were randomized to receive two cycles of CPR with PLR followed by two cycles of CPR without PLR (Group I) or vice-versa (Group II). Subjects had their foreheads (right and left) fitted with near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) electrodes (O3 System-Masimo, Masimo corporation Forty Parker, Irvine CA) while undergoing CPR during the study. NIRS readings, a measure of mixed venous, arterial, and capillary blood oxygen saturation, act as a surrogate measure of cerebral blood perfusion during CPR.
PLR was randomly used "first" in five of them, whereas it was used "second" in the remaining five subjects. In subjects in whom PLR was performed during first two cycles (Group I), NIRS values were initially significantly greater. The performance of PLR during CPR in Group II attenuated the decline in NIRS readings during CPR.
PLR during CPR is feasible and leads to augmentation of cerebral blood flow. Furthermore, the expected decline in cerebral blood flow over time during CPR may be attenuated by this maneuver. The clinical significance of these findings will require further investigations.
心肺复苏(CPR)期间的被动抬腿(PLR)是一种简单且无创的操作,有可能改善与患者相关的预后。最初的CPR指南曾提倡“在CPR期间抬高下肢以增强人工循环”。这一建议缺乏支持证据。
这是一项双交叉生理效应随机研究。
对10名在医院发生心脏骤停并接受CPR的患者进行研究。
受试者被随机分为两组,一组先接受两个周期的PLR心肺复苏,然后接受两个周期的非PLR心肺复苏(第一组);另一组反之(第二组)。在研究期间进行CPR时,受试者的前额(左右)安装近红外光谱(NIRS)电极(O3系统 - 美赛诺公司,美赛诺公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市四十帕克)。NIRS读数是混合静脉血、动脉血和毛细血管血氧饱和度的一种测量方法,可作为CPR期间脑血流灌注的替代指标。
其中5名受试者随机先使用PLR,其余5名受试者后使用PLR。在前两个周期进行PLR的受试者(第一组)中,NIRS值最初显著更高。第二组在CPR期间进行PLR减弱了CPR期间NIRS读数的下降。
CPR期间的PLR是可行的,并能增加脑血流量。此外,这种操作可能会减弱CPR期间脑血流量随时间的预期下降。这些发现的临床意义需要进一步研究。