Hartley Kris
Department of Public and International Affairs, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Ave, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Soc Indic Res. 2023;166(3):731-753. doi: 10.1007/s11205-023-03087-9. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
This study analyzes public perceptions about the impact of 'smart cities' programs on governance and quality-of-life. With smart city scholarship focusing primarily on technical and managerial issues, political legitimacy remains relatively underexplored-particularly in non-Western contexts. Drawing on a Hong Kong-based survey of over 800 residents conducted in 2019, this study analyzes the results of probit regressions on dependent variables for governance (participation, transparency, public services, communication, and fairness) and quality-of-life (buildings, energy-environment, mobility-transportation, education, and health). Findings show more optimism about the impact of smart cities on quality-of-life than on governance. Awareness about the smart city concept associates positively with expectations about smart city benefits, but the effect is sensitive to education level and income. This study deepens understandings about the political legitimacy of smart cities, at a time when urban governments are accelerating investments in related technologies. More broadly, it adds contextual nuance to research about state-society relations and, at a practical level, supports policy recommendations to strengthen information and awareness campaigns, better articulate smart city benefits, and openly acknowledge limitations.
本研究分析了公众对“智慧城市”项目对治理和生活质量影响的看法。由于智慧城市学术研究主要关注技术和管理问题,政治合法性仍相对未得到充分探索,尤其是在非西方背景下。基于2019年在香港对800多名居民进行的一项调查,本研究分析了对治理(参与、透明度、公共服务、沟通和公平)和生活质量(建筑、能源环境、交通出行、教育和健康)等因变量的概率回归结果。研究结果表明,公众对智慧城市对生活质量的影响比对治理的影响更为乐观。对智慧城市概念的认知与对智慧城市益处的期望呈正相关,但这种影响对教育水平和收入较为敏感。在城市政府加速对相关技术投资之际,本研究加深了对智慧城市政治合法性的理解。更广泛地说,它为关于国家与社会关系的研究增添了背景细节,并且在实践层面上,支持加强信息和宣传活动、更好地阐明智慧城市益处以及公开承认局限性的政策建议。