Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Apr;20(4):491-498. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-023ST.
Mechanically ventilated patients experience many adverse symptoms, such as anxiety, thirst, and dyspnea. However, these common symptoms are not included in practice guideline recommendations for routine assessment of mechanically ventilated patients. An American Thoracic Society-sponsored workshop with researchers and clinicians with expertise in critical care and symptom management was convened for a discussion of symptom assessment in mechanically ventilated patients. Members included nurses, physicians, a respiratory therapist, a speech-language pathologist, a critical care pharmacist, and a former intensive care unit patient. This report summarizes existing evidence and consensus among workshop participants regarding ) symptoms that should be considered for routine assessment of adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation; ) key symptom assessment principles; ) strategies that support symptom assessment in nonvocal patients; and ) areas for future clinical practice development and research. Systematic patient-centered assessment of multiple symptoms has great potential to minimize patient distress and improve the patient experience. A culture shift is necessary to promote ongoing holistic symptom assessment with valid and reliable instruments. This report represents our workgroup consensus on symptom assessment for mechanically ventilated patients. Future work should address how holistic, patient-centered symptom assessment can be embedded into clinical practice.
机械通气患者会经历许多不良反应,如焦虑、口渴和呼吸困难。然而,这些常见症状并未被纳入机械通气患者常规评估的实践指南推荐中。美国胸科学会(American Thoracic Society)组织了一次由重症监护和症状管理领域的研究人员和临床医生参加的研讨会,对机械通气患者的症状评估进行了讨论。成员包括护士、医生、呼吸治疗师、言语病理学家、重症监护药剂师和一名前重症监护病房患者。本报告总结了研讨会参与者对以下方面的现有证据和共识:(1) 应考虑对接受机械通气的成年患者进行常规评估的症状;(2) 关键症状评估原则;(3) 支持非言语患者症状评估的策略;以及 (4) 未来临床实践发展和研究的领域。系统的以患者为中心的多症状评估具有极大潜力,可以减轻患者的痛苦并改善患者体验。需要进行文化转变,以促进使用有效和可靠的工具对整体症状进行持续评估。本报告代表了我们工作组对机械通气患者症状评估的共识。未来的工作应解决如何将整体、以患者为中心的症状评估纳入临床实践。