Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物治疗呼吸困难:叙事性综述。

Opioids for breathlessness: a narrative review.

机构信息

Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK

Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Sep;10(3):287-295. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002314. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

Abstract

Chronic breathlessness is a disabling and distressing condition for which there is a growing evidence base for a range of interventions. Non-pharmacological interventions are the mainstay of management and should be optimised prior to use of opioid medication. Opioids are being implemented variably in practice for chronic breathlessness. This narrative review summarises the evidence defining current opioids for breathlessness best practice and identifies remaining research gaps. There is level 1a evidence to support the use of opioids for breathlessness. The best evidence is for 10-30 mg daily de novo low-dose oral sustained-release morphine in opioid-naïve patients. This should be considered the current standard of care following independent, regulatory scrutiny by one of the world's therapeutics regulatory bodies. Optimal benefits are seen in steady state; however, there are few published data about longer term benefits or harms. Morphine-related adverse events are common but mostly mild and self-limiting on withdrawal of drug. Early and meticulous management of constipation, nausea and vomiting is needed particularly in the first week of administration. Serious adverse events are no more common than placebo in clinical studies. Observational studies in severe chronic lung disease do not show excess mortality or hospital admission in those taking opioids. We have no long-term data on immune or endocrine function. There are promising data regarding prophylaxis for exertion-related breathlessness, but given the risks associated with transmucosal fentanyl, caution is needed with regard to clinical use pending longer term, robust safety data.

摘要

慢性呼吸困难是一种使人衰弱和痛苦的病症,目前有越来越多的证据支持一系列干预措施。非药物干预是管理的主要方法,应在使用阿片类药物之前进行优化。阿片类药物在慢性呼吸困难的治疗中应用存在差异。本综述总结了定义目前用于呼吸困难最佳实践的阿片类药物的证据,并确定了仍存在的研究空白。有 1a 级证据支持使用阿片类药物治疗呼吸困难。最好的证据是每天 10-30 毫克新起始的低剂量口服缓释吗啡用于阿片类药物初治患者。这应该是在世界上的一个治疗监管机构进行独立监管审查后,目前的护理标准。在稳定状态下可以看到最佳效果;然而,关于长期益处或危害的发表数据很少。与吗啡相关的不良反应很常见,但停药后通常是轻微和自限性的。需要早期和精心管理便秘、恶心和呕吐,尤其是在给药的第一周。在临床研究中,严重不良事件并不比安慰剂更常见。在严重慢性肺部疾病的观察性研究中,使用阿片类药物的患者死亡率或住院率并没有增加。我们没有关于免疫或内分泌功能的长期数据。有关于预防与劳累相关的呼吸困难的有希望的数据,但鉴于经粘膜芬太尼相关的风险,在等待更长期、更可靠的安全性数据的情况下,对于临床应用需要谨慎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验