Lukaski H C, Bolonchuk W W, Hall C B, Siders W A
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Apr;60(4):1327-32. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.60.4.1327.
This study was conducted to validate the relationship between bioelectrical conductance (ht2/R) and densitometrically determined fat-free mass, and to compare the prediction errors of body fatness derived from the tetrapolar impedance method and skinfold thicknesses, relative to hydrodensitometry. One-hundred and fourteen male and female subjects, aged 18-50 yr, with a wide range of fat-free mass (34-96 kg) and percent body fat (4-41%), participated. For males, densitometrically determined fat-free mass was correlated highly (r = 0.979), with fat-free mass predicted from tetrapolar conductance measures using an equation developed for males in a previous study. For females, the correlation between measured fat-free mass and values predicted from the combined (previous and present male data) equation for men also was strong (r = 0.954). The regression coefficients in the male and female regression equations were not significantly different. Relative to hydrodensitometry, the impedance method had a lower predictive error or standard error of the estimates of estimating body fatness than did a standard anthropometric technique (2.7 vs. 3.9%). Therefore this study establishes the validity and reliability of the tetrapolar impedance method for use in assessment of body composition in healthy humans.
本研究旨在验证生物电阻抗(ht2/R)与密度测定法确定的去脂体重之间的关系,并比较四极阻抗法和皮褶厚度法相对于水下密度测定法得出的体脂预测误差。114名年龄在18至50岁之间的男性和女性受试者参与了研究,他们的去脂体重(34 - 96千克)和体脂百分比(4 - 41%)范围广泛。对于男性,密度测定法确定的去脂体重与使用先前研究中为男性开发的方程从四极电导测量预测的去脂体重高度相关(r = 0.979)。对于女性,测量的去脂体重与根据男性的组合方程(先前和当前男性数据)预测的值之间的相关性也很强(r = 0.954)。男性和女性回归方程中的回归系数没有显著差异。相对于水下密度测定法,阻抗法在估计体脂方面的预测误差或估计标准误差低于标准人体测量技术(2.7%对3.9%)。因此,本研究确立了四极阻抗法在评估健康人体成分方面的有效性和可靠性。