Suppr超能文献

特发性肺纤维化的诊断挑战:多学科方法的重要性。

Challenges in the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

机构信息

Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.

Fondazione Policlinico, Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Expert Rev Respir Med. 2023 Apr;17(4):1-11. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2199156. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) requires the careful exclusion of secondary causes of interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the collaboration among different specialists is considered paramount to establish a diagnosis with high diagnostic confidence. The multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) has assumed an increasing importance over the years in the different phases of the IPF diagnostic work-up.

AREAS COVERED

The role of MDD in the diagnosis and management of IPF will be described. Practical insights will be provided into how and when to perform MDD based on the available scientific evidence. Current limitations and future perspectives will be discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

In the absence of high diagnostic confidence, agreement between different specialists during MDD is recognized as a surrogate indicator of diagnostic accuracy. Often, despite a lengthy evaluation, the diagnosis remains unclassifiable in a significant percentage of patients. MDD therefore appears to be pivotal in attaining an accurate diagnosis of ILDs. The discussion among different specialists can also include other specialists, such as rheumatologists and thoracic surgeons, in addition to the core group of pulmonologists, radiologists, and pathologists. Such discussions can allow greater diagnostic accuracy and have important effects on management, pharmacologic therapies, and prognosis.

摘要

简介

特发性肺纤维化 (IPF) 的诊断需要仔细排除间质性肺疾病 (ILD) 的继发性原因,不同专业人员的合作被认为是建立高诊断可信度的诊断的关键。多学科讨论 (MDD) 在 IPF 诊断工作的不同阶段多年来都具有越来越重要的意义。

涵盖领域

将描述 MDD 在 IPF 的诊断和管理中的作用。将根据现有科学证据提供有关如何以及何时进行 MDD 的实用见解。讨论当前的局限性和未来的观点。

专家意见

在缺乏高诊断可信度的情况下,MDD 期间不同专家之间的一致性被认为是诊断准确性的替代指标。尽管进行了长时间的评估,但仍有很大比例的患者无法明确诊断。因此,MDD 似乎是准确诊断ILD 的关键。不同专业人员之间的讨论还可以包括其他专家,如风湿病学家和胸外科医生,以及核心组的肺科医生、放射科医生和病理学家。此类讨论可以提高诊断准确性,并对管理、药物治疗和预后产生重要影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验