Yang L, Hu G Q
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 20;41(3):231-236. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20220418-00201.
The rapid development of high-speed railway in China has proposed higher requests for the comfort level of high-speed trains. However, there is no internationally unified evaluation criterion for high-speed train comfort currently, which therefore substantially affects the comparability and standardization of research results for high-speed train comfort. This paper systematically reviews the research literature about evaluation indicators and standards related to high-speed train comfort, and finds that there is currently no unified definition, evaluation indicators, as well as evaluation criterion for high-speed train comfort. Most current evaluation criteria are based on a single indicator. Some indicators are simultaneously developed by different apartments and differ between each other, and there is no comprehensive indicator or criteria for high-speed train comfort, restricting the comparison of high-speed train comfort across regions. It is recommended that the administrative department of high-speed railroad in China should organize experts to establish a unified definition of high-speed train comfort, comprehensive evaluation indicators and relevant judgment criteria for high-speed train comfort, in face of the rapid development and globalization of high-speed trains.
中国高速铁路的快速发展对高速列车的舒适度提出了更高要求。然而，目前国际上尚无统一的高速列车舒适度评价标准，这在很大程度上影响了高速列车舒适度研究成果的可比性和标准化。本文系统回顾了与高速列车舒适度相关的评价指标和标准的研究文献，发现目前高速列车舒适度尚无统一的定义、评价指标及评价标准。当前大多数评价标准基于单一指标。一些指标由不同部门同时制定，相互之间存在差异，且尚无高速列车舒适度的综合指标或标准，限制了不同地区高速列车舒适度的比较。建议中国高速铁路管理部门面对高速列车的快速发展和全球化，组织专家建立高速列车舒适度的统一定义、综合评价指标及相关判定标准。
