Bednar Dominic J, Reames Tony G
School for the Future of Innovation in Society and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, United States of America.
School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, United States of America.
Energy Res Soc Sci. 2023 May;99:103045. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103045. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
Millions of American households suffer from energy poverty, threatening their continued access to electricity. The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 has unveiled the entrenched environmental and energy injustices that threaten public health at the household level and has inspired energy protection responses to address pandemic-caused economic hardship. While policies supporting energy protections have been in place for years, they vary spatially. Moreover, the scholarly research that explores energy protection responses during the pandemic is limited. This paper explores energy protection responses to the pandemic implemented in 25 major metropolitan areas in the United States. We employ a content analysis of policy language to examine the response time, authorization level, and type of energy protections deployed during the initial months of the pandemic. We demarcate authorization level as either mandatory or voluntary measures and characterize 'energy resiliency responses' as a suite of residential energy protections required to reduce vulnerability to energy poverty and build resilience during the pandemic. We examine the total number and type of responses relative to household energy burden. We find differences in residential consumer energy protections among low-income and highly energy burdened households and conclude that protections are unevenly deployed across the country. Our findings motivate contemporary national, state, and local energy poverty recognition and responses that center personal and economic wellbeing during and after crises.
数以百万计的美国家庭面临能源贫困问题,这威胁到他们持续获得电力的能力。2020年的新冠疫情揭示了长期存在的环境和能源不公现象,这些不公在家庭层面威胁着公众健康,并激发了应对疫情导致的经济困难的能源保护措施。虽然支持能源保护的政策已经实施多年,但在空间上存在差异。此外,探索疫情期间能源保护措施的学术研究有限。本文探讨了美国25个主要大都市地区针对疫情实施的能源保护措施。我们采用政策语言内容分析法,研究疫情最初几个月内能源保护措施的响应时间、授权级别和类型。我们将授权级别划分为强制性或自愿性措施,并将“能源弹性措施”定义为一系列住宅能源保护措施,这些措施旨在降低能源贫困脆弱性,并在疫情期间增强恢复力。我们研究了与家庭能源负担相关的措施总数和类型。我们发现低收入和能源负担重的家庭在住宅消费者能源保护方面存在差异,并得出结论,这些保护措施在全国范围内的部署不均衡。我们的研究结果促使当代国家、州和地方认识到能源贫困问题,并做出以危机期间和危机后个人和经济福祉为核心的应对措施。