Suppr超能文献

关于种子植物比较的综述:对保护的启示

A review on - comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation.

作者信息

Chung Mi Yoon, Merilä Juha, Kim Yuseob, Mao Kangshan, López-Pujol Jordi, Chung Myong Gi

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences Chungnam National University Daejeon 34134 South Korea.

Ecological Genetics Research Unit, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Program, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki FI-00014 Finland.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e9926. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9926. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Increased access to genome-wide data provides new opportunities for plant conservation. However, information on neutral genetic diversity in a small number of marker loci can still be valuable because genomic data are not available to most rare plant species. In the hope of bridging the gap between conservation science and practice, we outline how conservation practitioners can more efficiently employ population genetic information in plant conservation. We first review the current knowledge about neutral genetic variation (NGV) and adaptive genetic variation (AGV) in seed plants, regarding both within-population and among-population components. We then introduce the estimates of among-population genetic differentiation in quantitative traits ( ) and neutral markers ( ) to plant biology and summarize conservation applications derived from - comparisons, particularly on how to capture most AGV and NGV on both in-situ and ex-situ programs. Based on a review of published studies, we found that, on average, two and four populations would be needed for woody perennials ( = 18) to capture 99% of NGV and AGV, respectively, whereas four populations would be needed in case of herbaceous perennials ( = 14). On average, is about 3.6, 1.5, and 1.1 times greater than in woody plants, annuals, and herbaceous perennials, respectively. Hence, conservation and management policies or suggestions based solely on inference on could be misleading, particularly in woody species. To maximize the preservation of the maximum levels of both AGV and NGV, we suggest using maximum rather than average . We recommend conservation managers and practitioners consider this when formulating further conservation and restoration plans for plant species, particularly woody species.

摘要

获取全基因组数据的机会增加为植物保护提供了新机遇。然而,少数标记位点的中性遗传多样性信息仍然很有价值,因为大多数珍稀植物物种无法获得基因组数据。为弥合保护科学与实践之间的差距,我们概述了保护从业者如何能更有效地在植物保护中利用群体遗传信息。我们首先回顾了关于种子植物中性遗传变异(NGV)和适应性遗传变异(AGV)的现有知识,涉及种群内和种群间的组成部分。然后我们将数量性状( )和中性标记( )的种群间遗传分化估计引入植物生物学,并总结从 - 比较中得出的保护应用,特别是关于如何在原地和迁地保护项目中捕获最多的AGV和NGV。基于对已发表研究的综述,我们发现,平均而言,木本多年生植物( = 18)分别需要两个和四个种群来捕获99%的NGV和AGV,而草本多年生植物( = 14)则需要四个种群。平均而言, 在木本植物、一年生植物和草本多年生植物中分别比 大约大3.6、1.5和1.1倍。因此,仅基于 的推断制定的保护和管理政策或建议可能会产生误导,特别是在木本物种中。为了最大限度地保护AGV和NGV的最高水平,我们建议使用最大 而不是平均 。我们建议保护管理者和从业者在为植物物种,特别是木本物种制定进一步的保护和恢复计划时考虑这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13d/10049885/29632301cdf5/ECE3-13-e9926-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验