• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从Q -F比较推断金鱼草植物亚种和种群之间潜在的适应性分化。

Potential adaptive divergence between subspecies and populations of snapdragon plants inferred from Q -F comparisons.

作者信息

Marin Sara, Gibert Anaïs, Archambeau Juliette, Bonhomme Vincent, Lascoste Mylène, Pujol Benoit

机构信息

PSL Université Paris, EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan Cedex, France.

Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique (EDB UMR 5174), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, CNRS, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Mol Ecol. 2020 Aug;29(16):3010-3021. doi: 10.1111/mec.15546. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1111/mec.15546
PMID:32652730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7540467/
Abstract

Phenotypic divergence among natural populations can be explained by natural selection or by neutral processes such as drift. Many examples in the literature compare putatively neutral (F ) and quantitative genetic (Q ) differentiation in multiple populations to assess their evolutionary signature and identify candidate traits involved with local adaptation. Investigating these signatures in closely related or recently diversified species has the potential to shed light on the divergence processes acting at the interspecific level. Here, we conducted this comparison in two subspecies of snapdragon plants (eight populations of Antirrhinum majus pseudomajus and five populations of A. m. striatum) in a common garden experiment. We also tested whether altitude was involved with population phenotypic divergence. Our results identified candidate phenological and morphological traits involved with local adaptation. Most of these traits were identified in one subspecies but not the other. Phenotypic divergence increased with altitude for a few biomass-related traits, but only in A. m. striatum. These traits therefore potentially reflect A. m. striatum adaptation to altitude. Our findings imply that adaptive processes potentially differ at the scale of A. majus subspecies.

摘要

自然种群间的表型差异可由自然选择或诸如漂变等中性过程来解释。文献中的许多例子比较了多个种群中假定的中性(F)分化和数量遗传(Q)分化,以评估它们的进化特征,并识别与局部适应相关的候选性状。在亲缘关系密切或近期分化的物种中研究这些特征,有可能揭示在种间水平上起作用的分化过程。在此,我们在一个共同花园实验中,对金鱼草植物的两个亚种(8个伪金鱼草种群和5个条纹金鱼草种群)进行了这种比较。我们还测试了海拔是否与种群表型差异有关。我们的结果识别出了与局部适应相关的候选物候和形态性状。其中大多数性状在一个亚种中被识别出来,而在另一个亚种中未被识别。一些与生物量相关的性状的表型差异随海拔升高而增加,但仅在条纹金鱼草中如此。因此,这些性状可能反映了条纹金鱼草对海拔的适应。我们的发现表明,在金鱼草亚种水平上,适应性过程可能存在差异。

相似文献

1
Potential adaptive divergence between subspecies and populations of snapdragon plants inferred from Q -F comparisons.从Q -F比较推断金鱼草植物亚种和种群之间潜在的适应性分化。
Mol Ecol. 2020 Aug;29(16):3010-3021. doi: 10.1111/mec.15546. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Phenotypic divergence of the common toad (Bufo bufo) along an altitudinal gradient: evidence for local adaptation.普通蟾蜍(Bufo bufo)沿海拔梯度的表型分化:局部适应的证据。
Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Jan;114(1):69-79. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.71. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
3
Molecular and quantitative trait variation within and among small fragmented populations of the endangered plant species Psilopeganum sinense.濒危植物华裸茎碎米荠小的碎片化种群内部及种群间的分子与数量性状变异
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(1):79-86. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct255. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
4
The roles of genetic drift and natural selection in quantitative trait divergence along an altitudinal gradient in Arabidopsis thaliana.基因漂变和自然选择在拟南芥沿海拔梯度的数量性状分化中的作用。
Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Feb;114(2):220-8. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.89. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
5
Genetic and morphological divergence in three strains of brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis commonly stocked in Lake Superior.苏必利尔湖常见投放的三种溪红点鲑(Salvelinus fontinalis)品系的遗传与形态差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 5;9(12):e113809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113809. eCollection 2014.
6
Role of selection and gene flow in population differentiation at the edge vs. interior of the species range differing in climatic conditions.在气候条件不同的物种分布范围边缘与内部,选择和基因流在种群分化中的作用。
Mol Ecol. 2016 Apr;25(7):1449-64. doi: 10.1111/mec.13565. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
7
Gene flow does not prevent personality and morphological differentiation between two blue tit populations.基因流并不能阻止两个蓝山雀种群在个性和形态上的分化。
J Evol Biol. 2018 Aug;31(8):1127-1137. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13291. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
Inferring local adaptation from QST-FST comparisons: neutral genetic and quantitative trait variation in European populations of great snipe.通过QST-FST比较推断局部适应性:欧洲大鹬种群的中性遗传和数量性状变异
J Evol Biol. 2007 Jul;20(4):1563-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01328.x.
9
Non-reproducible signals of adaptation to elevation between open and understorey microhabitats in snapdragon plants.在金鱼草植物中,开放和下层微生境之间对海拔适应的不可复制信号。
J Evol Biol. 2022 Feb;35(2):322-332. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13973. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
10
The influence of genetic drift and selection on quantitative traits in a plant pathogenic fungus.遗传漂变和选择对一种植物病原真菌数量性状的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112523. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Weak Genetic Isolation and Putative Phenotypic Selection in the Wild Carnation (Caryophyllaceae).野生康乃馨(石竹科)中的弱遗传隔离与假定的表型选择
Biology (Basel). 2023 Oct 23;12(10):1355. doi: 10.3390/biology12101355.
2
A review on - comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation.关于种子植物比较的综述:对保护的启示
Ecol Evol. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e9926. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9926. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Genome sequencing and resequencing identified three horizontal gene transfers and uncovered the genetic mechanism on the intraspecies adaptive evolution of Blume.

本文引用的文献

1
Selection and gene flow shape genomic islands that control floral guides.选择和基因流塑造了控制花向导的基因组岛。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 23;115(43):11006-11011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801832115. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
2
Trait differentiation and adaptation of plants along elevation gradients.植物沿海拔梯度的性状分化和适应。
J Evol Biol. 2018 Jun;31(6):784-800. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13262. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
3
Estimating Barriers to Gene Flow from Distorted Isolation-by-Distance Patterns.估计由偏离的隔离-距离模式引起的基因流障碍。
基因组测序和重测序鉴定出了三次水平基因转移,并揭示了梅花草种内适应性进化的遗传机制。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 4;13:1035157. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1035157. eCollection 2022.
4
Non-reproducible signals of adaptation to elevation between open and understorey microhabitats in snapdragon plants.在金鱼草植物中,开放和下层微生境之间对海拔适应的不可复制信号。
J Evol Biol. 2022 Feb;35(2):322-332. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13973. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Phenotypic Response to Light Versus Shade Associated with DNA Methylation Changes in Snapdragon Plants ().龙舌兰植物()中与 DNA 甲基化变化相关的光与荫响应的表型反应。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Feb 4;12(2):227. doi: 10.3390/genes12020227.
Genetics. 2018 Mar;208(3):1231-1245. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300638. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Differential adaptation drives ecological speciation in campions (Silene): evidence from a multi-site transplant experiment.差异适应性驱动蝇子草属植物(麦瓶草属)的生态物种形成:来自多地点移植实验的证据。
New Phytol. 2017 Feb;213(3):1487-1499. doi: 10.1111/nph.14202. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
5
Altitudinal gradients, plant hybrid zones and evolutionary novelty.海拔梯度、植物杂交带与进化新事物。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 5;369(1648). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0346.
6
Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.Q(ST)-F(ST) 比较:基因组异质性的进化和生态见解。
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Mar;14(3):179-90. doi: 10.1038/nrg3395. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
7
Q(ST) < F(ST) As a signature of canalization.Q(ST) < F(ST) 作为 canalization 的一个特征。
Mol Ecol. 2012 Dec;21(23):5646-55. doi: 10.1111/mec.12017. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
8
Q(ST) in a hierarchically structured population.在分层结构的人群中进行 Q(ST)。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 May;12(3):481-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03122.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
9
Patterns of floral colour neighbourhood and their effects on female reproductive success in an Antirrhinum hybrid zone.花色近邻格局及其对杂种 Antirrhinum 区雌性生殖成功的影响。
J Evol Biol. 2012 Feb;25(2):388-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02433.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
10
Comparisons between Q(ST) and F(ST) --how wrong have we been?Q(ST)与 F(ST)之间的比较——我们之前误解了多少?
Mol Ecol. 2011 Dec;20(23):4830-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05333.x. Epub 2011 Nov 8.