Suppr超能文献

用于HER2阳性乳腺癌的含或不含蒽环类药物的新辅助治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Neoadjuvant therapy with . without anthracyclines for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhu Jingjin, Min Ningning, Chen Yizhu, Li Xiru

机构信息

School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2023 Mar 15;11(5):200. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4030. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard treatment for early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, with most regimens using a combination of anti-HER2-targeted drugs and chemotherapy. However, the combination of anthracyclines and trastuzumab has high cardiac toxicity, and the efficacy evaluation of targeted therapy with or without anthracyclines is not unified. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of anti-HER2-targeted therapy combined with . without anthracyclines neoadjuvant treatment.

METHODS

The following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Study inclusion was determined according to PICOS principles. PICOS: Patients, HER2-positive breast cancer; Intervention, anti-HER2-targeted therapy combined with anthracyclines; Control, without anthracyclines; Outcomes, the percentage of pathologic complete response (pCR), breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and grade 3 or worse adverse events according to CTCAE version 4.03; Studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software, and the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 11 articles involving 1,998 patients were included with 1,155 patients in the anthracycline-containing group and 843 patients in the anthracycline-free group. For efficacy, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of pCR (OR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.61-1.48; P=0.83) and BCS (OR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.93-1.49; P=0.17) on anthracycline-free regimens compared with anthracycline-containing regimens. For safety, the combined effect values showed a significantly lower incidence of left ventricular ejection fraction decreases with the anthracycline-free regimen than with the anthracycline-containing regimen (OR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.35-0.71; P=0.0001). Other adverse effects and survival events were generally not statistically different in incidence between the two groups. The subgroup analysis suggested that hormone receptor status might be the source of heterogeneity in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the targeted therapy combined with anthracyclines was associated with an increased risk of cardiac adverse events compared with the anthracycline-free group, with no significant difference in the percentage of pCR and BCS. Due to the high heterogeneity of this meta-analysis, more studies with longer follow-up are needed to validate the current findings and to further explore the removal and retention of anthracyclines.

摘要

背景

新辅助治疗已成为早期人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌的标准治疗方法,大多数方案采用抗HER2靶向药物与化疗联合使用。然而,蒽环类药物与曲妥珠单抗联合使用具有较高的心脏毒性,且含或不含蒽环类药物的靶向治疗疗效评估并不统一。本荟萃分析的目的是评估抗HER2靶向治疗联合或不联合蒽环类药物新辅助治疗的相对疗效和安全性。

方法

系统检索以下数据库:PubMed、Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。根据PICOS原则确定研究纳入标准。PICOS:患者,HER2阳性乳腺癌;干预措施,抗HER2靶向治疗联合蒽环类药物;对照,不使用蒽环类药物;结局指标,病理完全缓解(pCR)率、保乳手术(BCS)率以及根据CTCAE 4.03版评估的3级或更严重不良事件;研究类型,随机对照试验(RCT)和回顾性研究。使用RevMan5.3软件进行荟萃分析,并计算比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共纳入11篇文章,涉及1998例患者,其中含蒽环类药物组1155例,不含蒽环类药物组843例。在疗效方面,与含蒽环类药物方案相比,不含蒽环类药物方案的pCR率(OR 0.95;95% CI:0.61 - 1.48;P = 0.83)和BCS率(OR 1.18;95% CI:0.93 - 1.49;P = 0.17)无统计学显著差异。在安全性方面,合并效应值显示,不含蒽环类药物方案导致左心室射血分数降低发生率显著低于含蒽环类药物方案(OR 0.50;95% CI:0.35 - 0.71;P = 0.0001)。两组其他不良反应和生存事件发生率总体无统计学差异。亚组分析表明,激素受体状态可能是本研究异质性的来源。

结论

我们的研究表明,与不含蒽环类药物组相比,联合蒽环类药物的靶向治疗与心脏不良事件风险增加相关,pCR率和BCS率无显著差异。由于本荟萃分析异质性较高,需要更多随访时间更长的研究来验证当前结果,并进一步探索蒽环类药物的取舍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27e5/10061451/169fd7e9b4dc/atm-11-05-200-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验