Malekpour Ghorbani Zahra, Shahriar Amir, Ghassemi Alireza
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Oral Health Research Center, Health Research Iinstitute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar;75(1):74-79. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03378-6. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
The piezo surgery was reported to cause minimal trauma to the soft tissue. The aim of this study was to compare the periorbital edema and ecchymosis after transcutaneous lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty using 2-mm osteotome versus Piezo scalpel respectively. In a randomized clinical trial and split-mouth-design, we performed primary rhinoplasty in 15 patients (7 men, 8 women; age 18-35 years, mean age 26.6 ± 5.7 years). Transcutaneous lateral osteotomy was performed using a 2-mm osteotome on the one side and a piezo scalpel on the opposite side. We took digital photographs of the face on 1, 3, 7 and 14 postoperative days. Three examiners used a standard 5-point Kara-Gokalan scale to assess the early postoperative periorbital edema and ecchymosis on each side. We found more difficult to use the piezo scalpel via only one incision and found easier to use two stab incisions for inserting the piezo scalpel. The time spend for each osteotomy was similar ( > 0.05). The inter-observer agreement was high (> 0.676). The postoperative edema showed to be significantly different on day 1, 3 and 7 (-value < 0.05), ecchymosis was much less on piezo side but not significantly. It was more difficult to use piezo scalpel via only one incision. The piezo scalpel showed to reduce the postoperative edema significantly and improved the ecchymosis. Swelling and bleeding could have crossed the midline and blurred the comparison of two sides. However, this is the best design to achieve the highest similarity in study condition. Level I, therapeutic study.
据报道,压电手术对软组织造成的创伤极小。本研究的目的是比较在鼻整形术中分别使用2毫米骨凿与压电刀经皮外侧截骨术后眶周水肿和瘀斑的情况。在一项随机临床试验和双侧对照设计中,我们对15例患者(7例男性,8例女性;年龄18 - 35岁,平均年龄26.6±5.7岁)进行了一期鼻整形术。在一侧使用2毫米骨凿进行经皮外侧截骨,在另一侧使用压电刀。我们在术后第1、3、7和14天对面部进行数码拍照。三名检查者使用标准的5分卡拉 - 戈卡兰量表评估每侧术后早期眶周水肿和瘀斑情况。我们发现仅通过一个切口使用压电刀更困难,而使用两个小切口插入压电刀更容易。每次截骨所花费的时间相似(>0.05)。观察者间的一致性较高(>0.676)。术后第1、3和7天水肿有显著差异(P值<0.05),压电刀一侧的瘀斑明显较少,但差异不显著。仅通过一个切口使用压电刀更困难。压电刀显示能显著减轻术后水肿并改善瘀斑情况。肿胀和出血可能越过中线,模糊了两侧的比较。然而,这是在研究条件下实现最高相似度的最佳设计。一级,治疗性研究。