Leung Ella H, Leder Henry A, Patel Shriji, Reddy Rahul, Boucher Nick, Sharma Chakshu, Blim Jill, Awh Carl, Hahn Paul
Georgia Retina, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Leder Retina, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2022 Jul 16;6(4):278-283. doi: 10.1177/24741264221098669. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
This work compares physician reimbursements for retinal detachment (RD) surgery with office-based patient care. A theoretical model was constructed from the physician's perspective for performing a 90-minute uncomplicated RD surgery with its associated perioperative work in the global period (Current Procedural Terminology code 67108) compared with managing 40 patients per 8-hour clinic day in the equivalent time period. The reimbursement rates were based on the 2019 values set by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Sensitivity analyses were performed varying the perioperative times, clinical productivity, and postoperative visits. The CMS physician reimbursement rate for 67108 surgery was 17.13 work relative value units (wRVUs); meanwhile, the physician in the reference case could have generated 40.89 wRVUs in the office. CMS reimbursement therefore represented a 58% opportunity cost relative to lost office productivity for the physician. A significant disparity was still present even when modeling 30 patients per day. In sensitivity analyses, clinical productivity exceeded surgical compensation in 99% of modeled scenarios. In threshold analyses, the surgeon in the reference case would have to complete the surgery and all immediate perioperative care within 18 minutes to equal the total CMS valuation. CMS reimbursement for RD surgery resulted in a significant opportunity cost for the physician relative to office-based patient care, which was more pronounced for more efficient clinicians in the office. The sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the model. Reductions in surgery reimbursements relative to office-based patient care might disincentivize busy clinicians.
这项研究比较了视网膜脱离(RD)手术与门诊患者护理中医师的报销情况。从医生的角度构建了一个理论模型,用于对比进行一台90分钟的非复杂性RD手术及其在全球周期内相关的围手术期工作(现行程序术语代码67108)与在相同时间段内每8小时门诊日管理40名患者的情况。报销率基于美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)设定的2019年数值。进行了敏感性分析,改变围手术期时间、临床工作效率和术后随访情况。CMS对67108手术的医生报销率为17.13个工作相对价值单位(wRVUs);与此同时,参考案例中的医生在门诊可产生40.89个wRVUs。因此,相对于医生门诊工作效率的损失,CMS报销代表了58%的机会成本。即使每天设定为管理30名患者进行建模时,仍然存在显著差距。在敏感性分析中,99%的建模场景下临床工作效率超过了手术报酬。在阈值分析中,参考案例中的外科医生必须在18分钟内完成手术及所有直接围手术期护理,才能等同于CMS的总估值。相对于门诊患者护理,CMS对RD手术的报销给医生带来了显著的机会成本,对于门诊效率更高的临床医生来说更为明显。敏感性分析支持了该模型的稳健性。相对于门诊患者护理,手术报销的减少可能会降低忙碌临床医生的积极性。