Suppr超能文献

使用主成分分析和拉东变换从单极高密度M波估计肌肉神经支配区

Muscle innervation zone estimation from monopolar high-density M-waves using principal component analysis and radon transform.

作者信息

Huang Chengjun, Lu Zhiyuan, Chen Maoqi, Klein Cliff S, Zhang Yingchun, Li Sheng, Zhou Ping

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.

School of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1137146. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1137146. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

This study examined methods for estimating the innervation zone (IZ) of a muscle using recorded monopolar high density M waves. Two IZ estimation methods based on principal component analysis (PCA) and Radon transform (RT) were examined. Experimental M waves, acquired from the biceps brachii muscles of nine healthy subjects were used as testing data sets. The performance of the two methods was evaluated by comparing their IZ estimations with manual IZ detection by experienced human operators. Compared with manual detection, the agreement rate of the estimated IZs was 83% and 63% for PCA and RT based methods, respectively, both using monopolar high density M waves. In contrast, the agreement rate was 56% for cross correlation analysis using bipolar high density M waves. The mean difference in estimated IZ location between manual detection and the tested method was 0.12 ± 0.28 inter-electrode-distance (IED) for PCA, 0.33 ± 0.41 IED for RT and 0.39 ± 0.74 IED for cross correlation-based methods. The results indicate that the PCA based method was able to automatically detect muscle IZs from monopolar M waves. Thus, PCA provides an alternative approach to estimate IZ location of voluntary or electrically-evoked muscle contractions, and may have particular value for IZ detection in patients with impaired voluntary muscle activation.

摘要

本研究探讨了利用记录的单极高密度M波估计肌肉神经支配区(IZ)的方法。研究了基于主成分分析(PCA)和Radon变换(RT)的两种IZ估计方法。从9名健康受试者的肱二头肌采集的实验M波用作测试数据集。通过将两种方法的IZ估计值与经验丰富的操作人员手动检测的IZ进行比较,评估了这两种方法的性能。与手动检测相比,基于PCA和RT的方法使用单极高密度M波时,估计IZ的一致率分别为83%和63%。相比之下,使用双极高密度M波进行互相关分析时,一致率为56%。手动检测与测试方法之间估计IZ位置的平均差异,PCA为0.12±0.28电极间距离(IED),RT为0.33±0.41 IED,基于互相关的方法为0.39±0.74 IED。结果表明,基于PCA的方法能够从单极M波中自动检测肌肉IZ。因此,PCA为估计自主或电诱发肌肉收缩的IZ位置提供了一种替代方法,对于自主肌肉激活受损患者的IZ检测可能具有特殊价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dff/10050562/ba61aa0ae2ed/fphys-14-1137146-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验