• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产前群体健康关系教育对产后避孕的影响。

Impact of Prenatal Group Healthy Relationship Education on Postpartum Contraception.

作者信息

Mazzoni Sara E, O'Reilly Treter Maggie, Hyer Jennifer, Peña Rachel, Rhoades Galena K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Mar 27;4(1):148-153. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0104. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1089/whr.2022.0104
PMID:37008185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10061321/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the impact of an antenatal group healthy relationship education program on the postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a planned subgroup analysis of a larger randomized controlled trial. Pregnant and newly parenting women were randomized to either group healthy relationship education, "MotherWise," or no additional services. An evidence-based healthy relationship education program and individual case management sessions were provided. The program did not include any prenatal care or contraception counseling. This subgroup analysis included those participants with a nonanomalous gestation randomized at <40 weeks who received care and delivered at a single safety-net hospital and were discharged home with a live infant(s).

RESULTS

From September 2, 2016 to December 21, 2018, 953 women were randomized in the larger trial; 507 met inclusion criteria for this study; 278 randomized to program and 229 controls. Participants were mostly young, parous, Hispanic, publicly insured women. Participants randomized to program were more likely to take a prescription medicine and be delivered through cesarean; there were not any other significant differences in baseline, antenatal, or perinatal outcomes. Those randomized to program were more likely to be discharged home with immediate postpartum LARC in place (odds ratio [OR] 1.87; confidence interval [CI] 1.17-3.00), and more likely to be using LARC at the postpartum visit (OR 2.19; CI 1.34-3.56).

CONCLUSION

Antenatal group healthy relationship education provided separately from prenatal care is associated with a twofold increase in the use of postpartum LARC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02792309; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02792309?term=NCT02792309&draw=2&rank=1.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估一项产前群体健康关系教育项目对产后长效可逆避孕方法(LARC)使用情况的影响。

材料与方法

这是一项对一项更大规模随机对照试验进行的预设亚组分析。怀孕及初为人母的女性被随机分为接受群体健康关系教育(“明智妈妈”项目)组或不接受额外服务组。提供了一项基于证据的健康关系教育项目及个案管理服务。该项目不包括任何产前护理或避孕咨询。此亚组分析纳入了那些妊娠正常、在孕40周前随机分组、在一家安全网医院接受护理并分娩且带着活产婴儿出院回家的参与者。

结果

从2016年9月2日至2018年12月21日,在更大规模试验中有953名女性被随机分组;507名符合本研究的纳入标准;278名被随机分入项目组,229名作为对照组。参与者大多为年轻、经产、西班牙裔、有公共保险的女性。被随机分入项目组的参与者更有可能服用处方药且通过剖宫产分娩;在基线、产前或围产期结局方面没有其他显著差异。被随机分入项目组的参与者更有可能在产后立即带着LARC出院回家(比值比[OR]1.87;置信区间[CI]1.17 - 3.00),且在产后访视时更有可能正在使用LARC(OR 2.19;CI 1.34 - 3.56)。

结论

与产前护理分开提供的产前群体健康关系教育与产后LARC使用量增加两倍相关。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02792309;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02792309?term=NCT02792309&draw=2&rank=1

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25d/10061321/e8c17345009f/whr.2022.0104_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25d/10061321/e8c17345009f/whr.2022.0104_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25d/10061321/e8c17345009f/whr.2022.0104_figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Prenatal Group Healthy Relationship Education on Postpartum Contraception.产前群体健康关系教育对产后避孕的影响。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Mar 27;4(1):148-153. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0104. eCollection 2023.
2
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth.产后妇女避孕方法的教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15(8):CD001863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863.pub3.
3
Prenatal Contraceptive Counseling by Video.视频产前避孕咨询
South Med J. 2019 Jan;112(1):8-13. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000913.
4
The effect of an educational video on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) utilization at 6-8 weeks postpartum period: a randomized controlled trial.教育视频对产后 6-8 周长效可逆避孕措施(LARC)使用的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1503-1509. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05710-3. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
5
Prenatal intent and postpartum receipt of long-acting reversible contraception among women receiving medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder.药物辅助治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的女性的产前意图和产后长效可逆避孕措施的使用。
Contraception. 2019 Jan;99(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
Comparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial.长效可逆避孕措施起始时增加早期就诊与常规产后护理的比较:一项随机试验。
Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 18.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval in women who plan postpartum LARC: a retrospective study.计划产后长效可逆避孕方法的女性中与妊娠间隔短相关的因素:一项回顾性研究
Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):245-250. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
An initiative to implement immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception in rural New Mexico.在新墨西哥州农村地区推行即刻产后长效可逆避孕措施的倡议。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S911.e1-S911.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Medicaid reimbursement program for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception improves uptake regardless of insurance status.产后即时长效可逆避孕的医疗补助报销计划可提高使用率,无论保险状况如何。
Contraception. 2022 Sep;113:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship education for women during pregnancy: The impact of MotherWise on birth outcomes.孕期女性关系教育:MotherWise 对生育结局的影响。
Fam Process. 2022 Sep;61(3):1134-1143. doi: 10.1111/famp.12756. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
2
Postpartum Contraception Use Rates of Patients Participating in the Centering Pregnancy Model of Care Versus Traditional Obstetrical Care.参与孕期集中护理模式与传统产科护理的患者产后避孕使用率
J Reprod Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;62(1-2):45-9.
3
Improved Outcomes for Hispanic Women with Gestational Diabetes Using the Centering Pregnancy Group Prenatal Care Model.
采用孕期集中式小组产前护理模式改善西班牙裔妊娠期糖尿病女性的结局。
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Feb;21(2):297-305. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2114-x.
4
The Effect of Centering Pregnancy versus Traditional Prenatal Care Models on Improved Adolescent Health Behaviors in the Perinatal Period.以孕妇为中心的护理模式与传统产前护理模式对改善围产期青少年健康行为的影响。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Oct;28(5):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
5
The Effectiveness of the Within Our Reach Relationship Education Program for Couples: Findings from a Federal Randomized Trial.“触手可及”夫妻关系教育项目的成效:一项联邦随机试验的结果
Fam Process. 2015 Dec;54(4):672-85. doi: 10.1111/famp.12148. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
6
The impact of the within my reach relationship training on relationship skills and outcomes for low-income individuals.“触手可及关系训练”对低收入个体关系技巧及结果的影响。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2013 Jul;39(3):346-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00314.x.
7
The impact of Centering Pregnancy Group Prenatal Care on postpartum family planning.孕期集中小组产前护理对产后计划生育的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):50.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
8
Relationship education research: current status and future directions.关系教育研究:现状与未来方向。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jan;38(1):169-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00247.x.
9
Using Individual-oriented Relationship Education to Prevent Family Violence.运用以个人为导向的关系教育预防家庭暴力。
J Couple Relatsh Ther. 2011;10(2):185-200. doi: 10.1080/15332691.2011.562844.