• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效可逆避孕措施起始时增加早期就诊与常规产后护理的比较:一项随机试验。

Comparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Division of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

出版信息

Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.010
PMID:29778586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6129199/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether an early 3-week postpartum visit in addition to the standard 6-week visit increases long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) initiation by 8 weeks postpartum compared to the routine 6-week visit alone.

STUDY DESIGN

We enrolled pregnant and immediate postpartum women into a prospective randomized, non-blinded trial comparing a single 6-week postpartum visit (routine care) to two visits at 3 and 6 weeks postpartum (intervention), with initiation of contraception at the 3-week visit, if desired. All participants received structured contraceptive counseling. Participants completed surveys in-person at baseline and at the time of each postpartum visit. A sample size of 200 total participants was needed to detect a 2-fold difference in LARC initiation (20% vs. 40%).

RESULTS

Between May 2016 and March 2017, 200 participants enrolled; outcome data are available for 188. The majority of LARC initiation occurred immediately postpartum (25% of the intervention arm and 27% of the routine care arm). By 8 weeks postpartum, 34% of participants in the intervention arm initiated LARC, compared to 41% in the routine care arm (p=.35). Overall contraceptive initiation by 8 weeks was 83% and 84% in the intervention and routine care arms, respectively (p=.79). There was no difference between the arms in the proportion of women who attended at least one postpartum visit (70% vs. 74%, p=.56).

CONCLUSION

The addition of a 3-week postpartum visit to routine care does not increase LARC initiation by 8 weeks postpartum. The majority of LARC users desired immediate rather than interval postpartum initiation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.govNCT02769676 IMPLICATIONS: The addition of a 3-week postpartum visit to routine care does not increase LARC or overall contraceptive initiation by 8 weeks postpartum when the option of immediate postpartum placement is available. The majority of LARC users desired immediate rather than interval postpartum initiation.

摘要

目的

探讨与标准 6 周产后访视相比,在常规 6 周访视的基础上增加 3 周产后访视是否能增加 8 周产后长效可逆避孕(LARC)的使用率。

研究设计

我们将孕妇和产后即刻的妇女纳入一项前瞻性随机、非盲试验,比较 6 周产后单次访视(常规护理)与 3 周和 6 周产后 2 次访视(干预组),如果需要,可在 3 周访视时开始避孕。所有参与者均接受了结构化的避孕咨询。参与者在基线和每次产后访视时亲自完成了问卷调查。需要 200 名总参与者的样本量来检测 LARC 起始率(20%与 40%)的两倍差异。

结果

2016 年 5 月至 2017 年 3 月,共纳入 200 名参与者;188 名参与者有结局数据。大多数 LARC 起始发生在产后即刻(干预组的 25%和常规护理组的 27%)。到 8 周产后时,干预组有 34%的参与者开始使用 LARC,而常规护理组有 41%(p=.35)。到 8 周时,干预组和常规护理组的总避孕起始率分别为 83%和 84%(p=.79)。两组之间至少参加一次产后访视的妇女比例无差异(70%比 74%,p=.56)。

结论

在可立即进行产后放置的情况下,常规护理中增加 3 周产后访视并不能增加 8 周产后 LARC 的使用。大多数 LARC 用户希望立即而不是间隔产后开始使用。

临床试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02769676

影响

当立即进行产后放置的选择可用时,在常规护理中增加 3 周产后访视并不能增加 8 周产后 LARC 或总避孕的起始率。大多数 LARC 用户希望立即而不是间隔产后开始使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bad/6129199/8b00fbfc7d4b/nihms968955f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bad/6129199/8b00fbfc7d4b/nihms968955f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bad/6129199/8b00fbfc7d4b/nihms968955f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial.长效可逆避孕措施起始时增加早期就诊与常规产后护理的比较:一项随机试验。
Contraception. 2018 Sep;98(3):223-227. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 18.
2
Prenatal Contraceptive Counseling by Video.视频产前避孕咨询
South Med J. 2019 Jan;112(1):8-13. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000913.
3
Prenatal intent and postpartum receipt of long-acting reversible contraception among women receiving medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder.药物辅助治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的女性的产前意图和产后长效可逆避孕措施的使用。
Contraception. 2019 Jan;99(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
4
Increasing IUD and Implant Use Among Those at Risk of a Subsequent Preterm Birth: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.提高有再次早产风险的人群中宫内节育器和皮下埋植避孕剂的使用率:产后避孕咨询的随机对照试验。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Sep-Oct;28(5):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
The effect of an educational video on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) utilization at 6-8 weeks postpartum period: a randomized controlled trial.教育视频对产后 6-8 周长效可逆避孕措施(LARC)使用的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1503-1509. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05710-3. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Barriers to Receiving Long-acting Reversible Contraception in the Postpartum Period.产后接受长效可逆避孕措施的障碍。
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):616-21. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
Effect of a mobile phone-assisted postpartum family planning service on the use of long-acting reversible contraception: a randomised controlled trial.手机辅助产后计划生育服务对长效可逆避孕措施使用的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Aug;25(4):264-268. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1764528. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
Views of general practitioners on providing contraceptive advice and long-acting reversible contraception at the 6-week postnatal visit: a qualitative study.全科医生对产后6周访视时提供避孕建议和长效可逆避孕方法的看法:一项定性研究
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Apr;42(2):99-106. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101198. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
9
Patients' experiences with South Carolina's immediate postpartum Long-acting reversible contraception Medicaid policy.南卡罗来纳州立即产后长效可逆避孕医疗补助政策下患者的体验。
Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #48: Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception for women at high risk for medical complications.母胎医学会(SMFM)咨询系列 #48:有发生医疗并发症高风险的妇女即刻产后长效可逆避孕。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):B2-B12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Negative Pregnancy Desires and Recent Condomless Sex Among Couples in Vietnam.越南夫妇中负面妊娠意愿与近期无保护性行为之间的关联。
J Sex Res. 2025 Jul 22:1-8. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2025.2530230.
2
Incorporating Black women's perspectives into long-acting reversible contraception implementation.将黑人女性的观点纳入长效可逆避孕措施的实施过程中。
F S Rep. 2022 Feb 23;3(2 Suppl):80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2022.02.005. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Contraceptive Method Choices in Women With and Without Opioid Use Who Have Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Nursery.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation With a 2- to 3-Week Compared With a 6-Week Postpartum Visit.产后2至3周与产后6周就诊时启动长效可逆避孕措施的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):788-794. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002246.
2
Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant for contraception.产后立即与延迟植入避孕植入物进行避孕
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 22;4(4):CD011913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub2.
3
The fourth trimester: a critical transition period with unmet maternal health needs.
新生儿重症监护病房和育婴室中有或没有使用阿片类药物的产妇的避孕方法选择
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 24;1(1):375-382. doi: 10.1089/whr.2019.0025. eCollection 2020.
产后期:一个产妇健康需求未得到满足的关键过渡期。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.032. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Predictors of Non-Attendance to the Postpartum Follow-up Visit.产后随访缺席的预测因素。
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(Suppl 1):22-27. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2184-9.
5
Two-week postpartum intrauterine contraception insertion: a study of feasibility, patient acceptability and short-term outcomes.产后两周宫内节育器置入:可行性、患者可接受性及短期结局研究
Contraception. 2017 Jan;95(1):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
6
U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016.美国 2016 年避孕方法选择实践推荐
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Jul 29;65(4):1-66. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1.
7
Intrauterine device placement at 3 versus 6 weeks postpartum: a randomized trial.产后3周与6周放置宫内节育器:一项随机试验。
Contraception. 2016 Apr;93(4):356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
8
Barriers to Receiving Long-acting Reversible Contraception in the Postpartum Period.产后接受长效可逆避孕措施的障碍。
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):616-21. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
9
Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception.产后立即放置宫内节育器用于避孕。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 26;2015(6):CD003036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003036.pub3.
10
Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial.剖宫产术中放置铜T380A与剖宫产后6周放置的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 12.