• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用全州卫生系统网络中的电子健康记录衡量健康差异的见解:一项案例研究。

Insights into measuring health disparities using electronic health records from a statewide network of health systems: A case study.

作者信息

Smith Maureen A, Gigot Matthew, Harburn Abbey, Bednarz Lauren, Curtis Katherine, Mathew Jomol, Farrar-Edwards Dorothy

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 1;7(1):e54. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.521. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2022.521
PMID:37008604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10052445/
Abstract

Within Wisconsin, our residents experience some of the worst health disparities in the nation. Public reporting on disparities in the quality of care is important to achieving accountability for reducing disparities over time and has been associated with improvements in care. Disparities reporting using statewide electronic health records (EHR) data would allow efficient and regular reporting, but there are significant challenges with missing data and data harmonization. We report our experience in creating a statewide, centralized EHR data repository to support health systems in reducing health disparities through public reporting. We partnered with the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (the "Collaborative"), which houses patient-level EHR data from 25 health systems including validated metrics of healthcare quality. We undertook a detailed assessment of potential disparity indicators (race and ethnicity, insurance status and type, and geographic disparity). Challenges for each indicator are described, with solutions encompassing internal (health system) harmonization, central (Collaborative) harmonization, and centralized data processing. Key lessons include engaging health systems in identifying disparity indicators, aligning with system priorities, measuring indicators already collected in the EHR to minimize burden, and facilitating workgroups with health systems to build relationships, improve data collection, and develop initiatives to address disparities in healthcare.

摘要

在威斯康星州,我们的居民面临着全国最严重的一些健康差异问题。公开报告医疗质量差异对于实现长期减少差异的问责制很重要,并且与医疗改善相关。利用全州范围的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行差异报告将实现高效且定期的报告,但在数据缺失和数据协调方面存在重大挑战。我们报告了我们创建全州范围的集中式EHR数据存储库的经验,以支持医疗系统通过公开报告减少健康差异。我们与威斯康星州医疗质量合作组织(“合作组织”)合作,该组织存储了来自25个医疗系统的患者级EHR数据,包括经过验证的医疗质量指标。我们对潜在的差异指标(种族和族裔、保险状况和类型以及地理差异)进行了详细评估。描述了每个指标面临的挑战,解决方案包括内部(医疗系统)协调、中央(合作组织)协调和集中式数据处理。关键经验教训包括让医疗系统参与确定差异指标、与系统优先事项保持一致、衡量EHR中已经收集的指标以减轻负担,以及促进与医疗系统的工作组建立关系、改善数据收集并制定解决医疗保健差异的举措。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10052445/13de3c99c99d/S2059866122005210_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10052445/13de3c99c99d/S2059866122005210_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bc/10052445/13de3c99c99d/S2059866122005210_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Insights into measuring health disparities using electronic health records from a statewide network of health systems: A case study.利用全州卫生系统网络中的电子健康记录衡量健康差异的见解:一项案例研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 1;7(1):e54. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.521. eCollection 2023.
2
Lessons learned about advancing healthcare equity from the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.从“质量对齐力量”倡议中汲取的推进医疗公平的经验教训。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s413-22.
3
Identifying Substantial Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Outcomes and Care in Wisconsin Using Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据识别威斯康星州健康结果和护理方面的实质性种族和族裔差异。
WMJ. 2021 Mar;120(S1):S13-S16.
4
Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill: Opportunities and Challenges.利用电子健康记录提高重病患者护理质量测量和问责制的机会与挑战
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S52-S60. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0542. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Core state preconception health indicators - pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system and behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2009.核心孕前健康指标 - 妊娠风险评估监测系统和行为危险因素监测系统,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Apr 25;63(3):1-62.
6
Collaborative Learning Among Health Care Organizations to Improve Quality and Advance Racial Equity.医疗保健组织之间的合作学习以提高质量和促进种族平等。
Health Equity. 2023 Sep 13;7(1):525-532. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0098. eCollection 2023.
7
A Case Study of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Using Electronic Health Records to Support Public Health Surveillance on an Emerging Cancer Control Topic.电子健康记录在新兴癌症防控主题公共卫生监测中的应用:以早发性结直肠癌病例研究为例
J Registry Manag. 2021 Spring;48(1):4-11.
8
Impact of health disparities collaboratives on racial/ethnic and insurance disparities in US community health centers.健康差异协作组织对美国社区健康中心种族/族裔及保险差异的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 8;170(3):279-86. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.493.
9
Modeling the Potential Impact of Missing Race and Ethnicity Data in Infectious Disease Surveillance Systems on Disparity Measures: Scenario Analysis of Different Imputation Strategies.建模缺失种族和民族数据对传染病监测系统中差异措施的潜在影响:不同插补策略的情景分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 9;8(11):e38037. doi: 10.2196/38037.
10
Improving the Collection of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Data to Reduce Healthcare Disparities: A Case Study from an Academic Medical Center.改善种族、族裔和语言数据收集以减少医疗保健差异:来自一所学术医疗中心的案例研究。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2016 Oct 1;13(Fall):1g. eCollection 2016 fall.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment and ascertainment in psychiatric molecular genetics: challenges and opportunities for cross-disorder research.精神科分子遗传学中的评估与确定:跨疾病研究的挑战与机遇
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(4):1627-1638. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02878-x. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
2
Realizing the potential of social determinants data in EHR systems: A scoping review of approaches for screening, linkage, extraction, analysis, and interventions.认识电子健康记录系统中社会决定因素数据的潜力:对筛查、关联、提取、分析和干预方法的范围审查
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 10;8(1):e147. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.571. eCollection 2024.
3
Automated Extraction of Stroke Severity From Unstructured Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Statewide Electronic Health Record and Influenza Vaccination Data to Plan and Prioritize COVID-19 Vaccine Outreach and Communications in Wisconsin Communities.利用全州电子健康记录和流感疫苗接种数据,为威斯康星州社区的新冠疫苗推广和宣传工作制定计划并确定优先事项。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Dec;111(12):2111-2114. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306524.
2
Identifying Substantial Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Outcomes and Care in Wisconsin Using Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据识别威斯康星州健康结果和护理方面的实质性种族和族裔差异。
WMJ. 2021 Mar;120(S1):S13-S16.
3
Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.
使用自然语言处理从非结构化电子健康记录中自动提取中风严重程度
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e036386. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036386. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Harnessing EHR data for health research.利用电子健康记录数据进行健康研究。
Nat Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):1847-1855. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03074-8. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
5
Automated Extraction of Stroke Severity from Unstructured Electronic Health Records using Natural Language Processing.使用自然语言处理技术从非结构化电子健康记录中自动提取中风严重程度
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 11:2024.03.08.24304011. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.08.24304011.
影响丹麦和瑞士协调健康数据收集、共享和链接的因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226015. eCollection 2019.
4
Challenges with quality of race and ethnicity data in observational databases.观察性数据库中种族和民族数据质量面临的挑战。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):730-736. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz113.
5
Underserved populations with missing race ethnicity data differ significantly from those with structured race/ethnicity documentation.服务不足的人群中缺失种族民族数据与那些有结构化种族/民族文档记录的人群有显著差异。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):722-729. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz040.
6
Making Neighborhood-Disadvantage Metrics Accessible - The Neighborhood Atlas.让邻里劣势指标易于获取——邻里地图集。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2456-2458. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1802313.
7
Lessons learned about advancing healthcare equity from the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.从“质量对齐力量”倡议中汲取的推进医疗公平的经验教训。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s413-22.
8
Using health information exchanges to calculate clinical quality measures: A study of barriers and facilitators.利用健康信息交换来计算临床质量指标:障碍和促进因素研究。
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Jun;4(2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 26.
9
US Physician Practices Spend More Than $15.4 Billion Annually To Report Quality Measures.美国医生诊所每年花费超过154亿美元用于报告质量指标。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar;35(3):401-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1258.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Quality of Health Care.卫生保健质量中的种族和民族差异。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:375-94. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021439. Epub 2016 Jan 18.