Suppr超能文献

不同算法下分层双侧数据相对风险比的齐性检验。

Homogeneity test of relative risk ratios for stratified bilateral data under different algorithms.

作者信息

Mou Ke-Yi, Ma Chang-Xing, Li Zhi-Ming

机构信息

College of Mathematics and System Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, People's Republic of China.

Department of Biostatistics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Stat. 2021 Dec 24;50(5):1060-1077. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.2017412. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Medical clinical studies about paired body parts often involve stratified bilateral data. The correlation between responses from paired parts should be taken into account to avoid biased or misleading results. This paper aims to test if the relative risk ratios across strata are equal under the optimal algorithms. Based on different algorithms, we obtain the desired global and constrained maximum likelihood estimations (MLEs). Three asymptotic test statistics (i.e. , and ) are proposed. Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of these algorithms with respect to mean square errors of MLEs and convergence rate. The empirical results show Fisher scoring algorithm is usually better than other methods since it has effective convergence rate for global MLEs, and makes mean-square error lower for constrained MLEs. Three test statistics are compared in terms of type I error rate (TIE) and power. Among these statistics, is recommended according to its robust TIEs and satisfactory power.

摘要

关于成对身体部位的医学临床研究通常涉及分层的双侧数据。应考虑成对部位反应之间的相关性,以避免产生有偏差或误导性的结果。本文旨在检验在最优算法下各层的相对风险比是否相等。基于不同的算法,我们获得了所需的全局和约束最大似然估计(MLE)。提出了三种渐近检验统计量(即 、 和 )。进行了蒙特卡罗模拟,以评估这些算法在MLE的均方误差和收敛速度方面的性能。实证结果表明,费舍尔评分算法通常优于其他方法,因为它对全局MLE具有有效的收敛速度,并且使约束MLE的均方误差更低。比较了三种检验统计量的I型错误率(TIE)和检验功效。在这些统计量中, 根据其稳健的TIE和令人满意的功效被推荐。

相似文献

10
Testing the homogeneity of proportions for combined unilateral and bilateral data.检验单侧和双侧联合数据比例的同质性。
J Biopharm Stat. 2021 Sep 3;31(5):686-704. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2021.1946693. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Objective Bayesian Inference for Bilateral Data.双边数据的客观贝叶斯推断
Bayesian Anal. 2015 Mar;10(1):139-170. doi: 10.1214/14-BA890. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
3
Homogeneity test for correlated binary data.相关二元数据的齐性检验。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 21;10(4):e0124337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124337. eCollection 2015.
6
Goodness-of-fit tests for correlated paired binary data.关联性配对二项数据的拟合优度检验。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2012 Aug;21(4):331-45. doi: 10.1177/0962280210381176. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
10
Choice of effect measure for epidemiological data.流行病学数据效应测量指标的选择
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Sep;53(9):931-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00210-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验