文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

双侧数据医学研究中比例差的渐近置信区间构建。

Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, PR China.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Jun;20(3):233-59. doi: 10.1177/0962280209358135. Epub 2010 Feb 24.


DOI:10.1177/0962280209358135
PMID:20181778
Abstract

Bilateral dichotomous data are very common in modern medical comparative studies (e.g. comparison of two treatments in ophthalmologic, orthopaedic and otolaryngologic studies) in which information involving paired organs (e.g. eyes, ears and hips) is available from each subject. In this article, we study various confidence interval estimators for proportion difference based on Wald-type statistics, Fieller theorem, likelihood ratio statistic, score statistics and bootstrap resampling method under the dependence or/and independence models for bilateral binary data. Performance is evaluated with respect to the coverage probability and expected width via simulation studies. Our empirical results show that (1) ignoring the dependence feature of bilateral data could lead to severely incorrect coverage probabilities; and (2) Wald-type, score-type and bootstrap confidence intervals based on the dependence model perform satisfactorily for small to large sample sizes in the sense that their empirical coverage probabilities are close to the pre-specified nominal confidence level and are hence recommended. A real data from an otolaryngologic study is used to illustrate the proposed methods.

摘要

双边二分数据在现代医学比较研究中非常常见(例如眼科、骨科和耳鼻喉科研究中比较两种治疗方法),其中每个受试者的配对器官(例如眼睛、耳朵和臀部)都有相关信息。在本文中,我们研究了双边二项数据的依赖或/和独立模型下基于 Wald 型统计量、Fieller 定理、似然比统计量、得分统计量和自举重抽样方法的比例差异的各种置信区间估计。通过模拟研究,根据覆盖概率和期望宽度评估性能。我们的实证结果表明:(1)忽略双边数据的相关性特征可能会导致严重不正确的覆盖概率;(2)基于依赖模型的 Wald 型、得分型和自举置信区间在小到大样本量的情况下表现良好,因为它们的经验覆盖概率接近预设的名义置信水平,因此建议使用。来自耳鼻喉科研究的真实数据用于说明所提出的方法。

相似文献

[1]
Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2010-2-24

[2]
Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.

Stat Med. 2009-2-15

[3]
Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.

Stat Med. 2005-12-15

[4]
A comparison of methods for the construction of confidence interval for relative risk in stratified matched-pair designs.

Stat Med. 2010-1-15

[5]
Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.

J Biopharm Stat. 2009-9

[6]
Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.

J Biopharm Stat. 2016

[7]
Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.

Stat Med. 2004-4-30

[8]
Common risk difference test and interval estimation of risk difference for stratified bilateral correlated data.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2018-6-19

[9]
Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.

J Biopharm Stat. 2009

[10]
Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016-3-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Homogeneity test of relative risk ratios for stratified bilateral data under different algorithms.

J Appl Stat. 2021-12-24

[2]
Simultaneous confidence interval construction for many-to-one comparisons of proportion differences based on correlated paired data.

J Appl Stat. 2020-7-22

[3]
Objective Bayesian Inference for Bilateral Data.

Bayesian Anal. 2015-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索