The effect of prolapse surgery on voiding function.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Of women with symptomatic prolapse, 13-39% experience voiding dysfunction (VD). The aim of our observational cohort study was to determine the effect of prolapse surgery on voiding function.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 392 women who underwent surgery between May 2005 and August 2020. All had a standardized interview, POP-Q, uroflowmetry and 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) pre-and postoperatively. Primary outcome was change in VD symptoms. Secondary outcomes were changes in maximum urinary flow rate (MFR) centile and post-void residual urine (PVR). Explanatory measures were change in pelvic organ descent as seen on POP-Q and TPUS.

RESULTS

Of 392 women, 81 were excluded due to missing data, leaving 311. Mean age and BMI were 58 years and 30 kg/m, respectively. Procedures performed included anterior repair (n = 187, 60.1%), posterior repair (n = 245, 78.8%), vaginal hysterectomy (n = 85, 27.3%), sacrospinous colpopexy (n = 170, 54.7%) and mid-urethral sling (MUS) (n = 192, 61.7%). Mean follow-up was 7 (1-61) months. Pre-operatively, 135 (43.3%) women reported symptoms of VD. Postoperatively, this decreased to 69 (22.2%) (p < 0.001), and of those, 32 (10.3%) reported de novo VD. The difference remained significant after excluding concomitant MUS surgery (n = 119, p < 0.001). Postoperatively, there was a significant decrease in mean PVR (n = 311, p < 0.001). After excluding concomitant MUS surgery, there was a significant increase in mean MFR centile (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolapse repair significantly reduces symptoms of VD and improves PVR and flowmetry.