• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前腰大肌横截面积与后路腰椎手术后短期功能结局相关。

Preoperative cross-sectional area of psoas muscle correlates with short-term functional outcomes after posterior lumbar surgery.

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

North Shore University Hospital, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY, USA.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2023 Jul;32(7):2326-2335. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07533-7. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-07533-7
PMID:37010611
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal level for the measurement of psoas cross-sectional area and examine the correlation with short-term functional outcomes of posterior lumbar surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent minimally invasive posterior lumbar surgery were included in this study. The cross-sectional area of psoas muscle was measured at each intervertebral level on T2-weighted axial images of preoperative MRI. Normalized total psoas area (NTPA) (mm/m) was calculated as total psoas area normalized to patient height. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated for the analysis of inter-rater reliability. Patient reported outcome measures including Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), short form health survey (SF-12) and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system were collected. A multivariate analysis was performed to elucidate independent predictors associated with failure to reach minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in each functional outcome at 6 months.

RESULTS

The total of 212 patients were included in this study. ICC was highest at L3/4 [0.992 (95% CI: 0.987-0.994)] compared to the other levels [L1/2 0.983 (0.973-0.989), L2/3 0.991 (0.986-0.994), L4/5 0.928 (0.893-0.952)]. Postoperative PROMs were significantly worse in patients with low NTPA. Low NTPA was an independent predictor of failure to reach MCID in ODI (OR = 2.68; 95% CI: 1.26-5.67; p = 0.010) and VAS leg (OR = 2.43; 95% CI: 1.13-5.20; p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Decreased psoas cross-sectional area on preoperative MRI correlated with functional outcomes after posterior lumbar surgery. NTPA was highly reliable, especially at L3/4.

摘要

目的

确定测量竖脊肌横截面积的最佳水平,并研究其与后路腰椎手术后短期功能结果的相关性。

方法

本研究纳入了接受微创后路腰椎手术的患者。在术前 MRI 的 T2 加权轴位图像上测量每个椎间水平的竖脊肌横截面积。将竖脊肌总面积归一化为患者身高,得到标准化总竖脊肌面积(NTPA)(mm/m)。计算组内相关系数(ICC)以分析组内可靠性。收集患者报告的结果测量指标,包括 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、简明健康调查量表(SF-12)和患者报告结局测量信息系统。进行多元分析以阐明与 6 个月时每个功能结局未达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)相关的独立预测因素。

结果

本研究共纳入 212 例患者。与其他水平相比,L3/4 处的 ICC 最高[0.992(95% CI:0.987-0.994)] [L1/2 0.983(0.973-0.989),L2/3 0.991(0.986-0.994),L4/5 0.928(0.893-0.952)]。NTPA 较低的患者术后 PROM 明显较差。低 NTPA 是 ODI 未达到 MCID 的独立预测因素(OR=2.68;95% CI:1.26-5.67;p=0.010)和 VAS 腿部(OR=2.43;95% CI:1.13-5.20;p=0.022)。

结论

术前 MRI 上竖脊肌横截面积的减少与后路腰椎手术后的功能结果相关。NTPA 高度可靠,尤其是在 L3/4。

相似文献

1
Preoperative cross-sectional area of psoas muscle correlates with short-term functional outcomes after posterior lumbar surgery.术前腰大肌横截面积与后路腰椎手术后短期功能结局相关。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jul;32(7):2326-2335. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07533-7. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.腰椎间盘切除术后肌肉健康与患者报告结果的关系:早期结果。
Spine J. 2022 Oct;22(10):1677-1686. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
3
Paraspinal Sarcopenia Independently Predicts Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Open but Not Minimally Invasive Single-Level Lumbar Decompression.椎旁肌少症独立预测开放而非微创单节段腰椎减压术后患者报告的结局。
Spine J. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.07.012.
4
Impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists' Classification on Postoperative Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.美国麻醉医师学会分类对腰椎减压术后满意度和临床结局的影响:队列匹配分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 1;37(2):E89-E96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001553. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
5
A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)与后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PLF)的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1911-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07567-x. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
6
Examination of clinical and radiographic outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of TLIF, MidLIF, and MIS-TLIF procedures.腰椎椎间融合术后临床及影像学结果的检查:经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术、腰椎中间椎体间融合术和微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的回顾性分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 May 2;43(1):52-62. doi: 10.3171/2025.1.SPINE241286. Print 2025 Jul 1.
7
Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis?术前腰痛是否会影响微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱症患者的报告结局?
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Jun 1;37(5):E179-E184. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001568. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
Preoperative Multifidus and Psoas Major Muscle Quality and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterolateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Predictors for Preoperative Disability and Back Pain Improvement.腰椎前路椎间融合术后术前多裂肌和腰大肌质量与患者报告结局:术前残疾和背痛改善的预测因素
World Neurosurg. 2025 Feb;194:123414. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.143. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
9
Comparative efficacy of autologous iliac bone versus allogeneic demineralized bone matrix in lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a novel minimally invasive iliac bone retrieval tool: a self-controlled study.使用新型微创髂骨获取工具进行腰椎外侧椎间融合时自体髂骨与同种异体脱矿骨基质的比较疗效:一项自身对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 16;20(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06073-8.
10
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.微创与开放后路腰椎融合术的围手术期结局及不良事件:荟萃分析与系统评价
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):416-27. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE14973. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of the correlation between paraspinal muscles fat infiltration and vertebral bone quality in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.腰椎退行性疾病患者椎旁肌脂肪浸润与椎体骨质质量相关性的比较分析
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09142-y.
2
Changes of water and muscle content in lumbar paraspinal muscle degeneration and gender differences during aging using dual-energy CT.使用双能CT评估衰老过程中腰椎旁肌退变时水分和肌肉含量的变化及性别差异。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08968-w.
3
Development of a risk scoring system for surgical site infection after lumbar surgery using Dixon MRI and clinical parameters.

本文引用的文献

1
Sarcopenia predicts perioperative adverse events following complex revision surgery for the thoracolumbar spine.肌少症预测胸腰椎复杂翻修手术后围手术期不良事件。
Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):1001-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
2
Sarcopenia, but not frailty, predicts early mortality and adverse events after emergent surgery for metastatic disease of the spine.肌少症而非虚弱,可预测脊柱转移瘤急症手术后的早期死亡率和不良事件。
Spine J. 2020 Jan;20(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
3
Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Effect of the Learning Curve.
使用迪克森磁共振成像(Dixon MRI)和临床参数开发腰椎手术后手术部位感染的风险评分系统。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08971-1.
4
Radiographic phenotype-driven clustering in lumbar decompression: comparative study of outcome and reoperation risk.腰椎减压术中基于影像学表型的聚类分析:疗效与再次手术风险的比较研究
Spine J. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.04.015.
5
Influence of coronal lumbar Cobb angle and surgical level on short-segment lumbar surgery outcomes in degenerative scoliosis.冠状面腰椎Cobb角及手术节段对退行性脊柱侧凸短节段腰椎手术疗效的影响
Eur Spine J. 2025 Feb;34(2):773-781. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08599-7. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
6
Impact of postoperative spinal malalignment on postoperative health-related quality of life after long-level fixation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: does residual coronal angularity matter?长节段固定治疗退行性腰椎脊柱侧凸术后脊柱对线不良对术后健康相关生活质量的影响:残余冠状角度是否重要?
Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):3872-3879. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08372-w. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
Correlation between Preoperative MRI Parameters and Oswestry Disability Index in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.腰椎管狭窄症患者术前 MRI 参数与 Oswestry 功能障碍指数的相关性:一项回顾性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 14;59(11):2000. doi: 10.3390/medicina59112000.
微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的辐射暴露:学习曲线的影响
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Feb 22;13(1):39-45. doi: 10.14444/6006. eCollection 2019 Jan.
4
The impact of sarcopenia on the results of lumbar spinal surgery.肌肉减少症对腰椎手术结果的影响。
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018 Mar;4(1):33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
5
Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.肌少症:定义和诊断的欧洲共识修订版。
Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169.
6
Influence of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Spinal Alignment on Surgical Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.骨骼肌质量和脊柱排列对腰椎管狭窄症手术疗效的影响
Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):556-562. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.556. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
Association between paraspinal muscle morphology, clinical symptoms and functional status in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者的脊柱旁肌形态、临床症状与功能状态之间的关系。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Oct;26(10):2543-2551. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5228-y. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
8
Frailty and sarcopenia do not predict adverse events in an elderly population undergoing non-complex primary elective surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.衰弱和肌肉减少症并不能预测老年人群在接受非复杂原发性择期手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病时发生不良事件。
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
Effect of Sarcopenia on Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality After Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery.肌肉减少症对胸腰椎手术后发病率和死亡率的影响。
Orthopedics. 2016 Nov 1;39(6):e1159-e1164. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160811-02. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
10
The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.腰椎管狭窄症手术后疼痛与功能障碍的临床病程:队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):324-335. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4668-0. Epub 2016 Jul 21.