• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于脐带盘绕指数作为妊娠结局预测指标的纵向分析研究。

A Longitudinal Analytical Study on Umbilical Cord Coiling Index as a Predictor of Pregnancy Outcome.

作者信息

Subashini Gopinath, Anitha Christina, Gopinath Ganesan, Ramyathangam K

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Annaii Medical College and Hospital, Sriperumbudur, IND.

Radiology, Panimalar Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Mar 2;15(3):e35680. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35680. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.35680
PMID:37012952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066625/
Abstract

Background The umbilical cord coiling index (UCI) is usually measured sonographically during antenatal follow-up and can be used to determine the fetuses at risk of adverse outcomes. Methodology UCI measured antenatally and postnatally whose correlation is studied along with the association of abnormal UCI with the adverse outcomes in terms of gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), intra-uterine death, birth weight, sex, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, the color of the liquor, Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI), Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration (APGAR) score at one min and five mins and mode of delivery. All parameters are tested for significant differences among UCI and a p-value < 0.05 is considered significant. The correlation of UCI measured antenatally and postnatally is tested using the spearman correlation coefficient. Results A strong correlation is found between antenatal UCI and postnatal UCI with r 0.9. The majority of the population had normo coiling. Hyper and hypo coiling are associated risks of emergency lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). Low birth weight is seen in 88.89% of hypo coiled patients with a p-value < 0.01. The coiling index among sex is found to be insignificant with a p-value of 0.81. Meconium-Stained Liquor (MSL) is seen in 78.5% of hyper coiled patients. IUGR is found to be associated with hypo coiling as seen in 59.2% of patients with significant p-value (< 0.01). Age, gestational age, and birth weight are found to be statistically significant between various coiling indexes with p-value < 0.05. Conclusion Antenatal UCI correlates with postnatal UCI and any abnormal index found can be used as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcomes and help obstetricians to monitor continuously and put the patients at risk on prophylactic measures.

摘要

背景

脐带缠绕指数(UCI)通常在产前随访期间通过超声测量,可用于确定有不良结局风险的胎儿。

方法

对产前和产后测量的UCI进行研究,分析其相关性,以及异常UCI与不良结局在胎龄、宫内生长受限(IUGR)、宫内死亡、出生体重、性别、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院情况、羊水颜色、羊水指数(AFI)、1分钟和5分钟时的外观、脉搏、 grimace、活动和呼吸(APGAR)评分以及分娩方式等方面的关联。对所有参数进行UCI之间的显著差异检验,p值<0.05被认为具有显著性。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数检验产前和产后测量的UCI的相关性。

结果

产前UCI与产后UCI之间存在强相关性,r为0.9。大多数人群脐带缠绕正常。过度缠绕和缠绕不足与急诊下段剖宫产(LSCS)相关。88.89%的缠绕不足患者出生体重低,p值<0.01。性别之间的缠绕指数无显著性差异,p值为0.81。78.5%的过度缠绕患者羊水粪染。发现IUGR与缠绕不足相关,59.2%的患者具有显著p值(<0.01)。不同缠绕指数之间的年龄、胎龄和出生体重在统计学上具有显著性差异,p值<0.05。

结论

产前UCI与产后UCI相关,发现的任何异常指数都可作为围产期不良结局的预测指标,帮助产科医生持续监测并对有风险的患者采取预防措施。

相似文献

1
A Longitudinal Analytical Study on Umbilical Cord Coiling Index as a Predictor of Pregnancy Outcome.一项关于脐带盘绕指数作为妊娠结局预测指标的纵向分析研究。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 2;15(3):e35680. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35680. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Re-evaluation of umbilical cord coiling index in adverse pregnancy outcome - Does it have role in obstetric management?不良妊娠结局中脐带螺旋指数的重新评估——其在产科管理中是否有作用?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Dec 6;21:100265. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100265. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Umbilical cord coiling index for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis and sequential analysis.用于预测不良妊娠结局的脐带缠绕指数:一项荟萃分析和序贯分析
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Dec;33(23):4022-4029. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1594187. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcome.脐带绕颈指数与围产期结局
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Aug;7(8):1675-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5135.3224. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
5
Antenatal umbilical coiling index and Doppler flow characteristics.产前脐动脉螺旋指数及多普勒血流特征
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;28(5):699-703. doi: 10.1002/uog.2745.
6
Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umbilical cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome.妊娠中期超声评估异常脐带缠绕与不良妊娠结局的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;193(2):387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.092.
7
Umbilical coiling index & the perinatal outcome.脐动脉螺旋指数与围产期结局
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Feb;62(1):43-6. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0158-4. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
8
Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome.产前脐动脉螺旋指数作为围产期结局的预测指标
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):763-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3456-5. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
9
The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome.脐动脉螺旋指数与围产期不良结局
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Oct;95(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.05.029. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
10
Adverse pregnancy outcomes and the abnormal umbilical cord coiling index.不良妊娠结局与异常脐带缠绕指数。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2024;17(5):681-688. doi: 10.3233/NPM-230106.

引用本文的文献

1
Umbilical Cord Tensile Strength Under Varying Strain Rates.不同应变率下的脐带拉伸强度
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 22;12(8):789. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080789.
2
Sonographic evaluation of antenatal umbilical coiling index and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A prospective cohort study.产前超声评估脐动脉螺旋指数及其与不良妊娠结局的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jul 4;14:262. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1167_24. eCollection 2025.
3
Twisting the theory on the origin of human umbilical cord coiling featuring monozygotic twins.

本文引用的文献

1
Umbilical cord coiling index for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis and sequential analysis.用于预测不良妊娠结局的脐带缠绕指数:一项荟萃分析和序贯分析
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Dec;33(23):4022-4029. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1594187. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
2
Umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcome.脐带绕颈指数与围产期结局
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Aug;7(8):1675-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5135.3224. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study.
扭转关于具有同卵双胞胎特征的人类脐带缠绕起源的理论。
Life Sci Alliance. 2024 Jun 3;7(8). doi: 10.26508/lsa.202302543. Print 2024 Aug.
4
Abnormal umbilical cord coiling and association with pregnancy factors.异常脐带缠绕及其与妊娠因素的关联。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2024 Mar 6;25(1):44-52. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2023-3-3.
5
Umbilical Cord Diseases Affecting Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes.影响产科和围产期结局的脐带疾病
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;11(19):2634. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192634.
脐绕指数作为围产期结局的标志物:一项分析性研究。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:213689. doi: 10.1155/2012/213689. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
4
Evaluation of umbilical cord thickness, cross-sectional area, and coiling index as predictors of pregnancy outcome.评估脐带厚度、横截面积和盘绕指数作为妊娠结局预测指标的情况。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011 Jul;21(3):195-8. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.85367.
5
Bioengineering aspects of the umbilical cord.脐带的生物工程学方面
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 May;144 Suppl 1:S108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
6
Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index.异常脐带螺旋指数的病理生理意义
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;30(6):804-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.5180.
7
The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome.脐动脉螺旋指数与围产期不良结局
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Oct;95(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.05.029. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
8
Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies.正常妊娠和复杂妊娠中的脐绕指数
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;107(5):1049-55. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000209197.84185.15.
9
The umbilical coiling index in complicated pregnancy.复杂妊娠中的脐动脉螺旋指数
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Jan;130(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.018. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
10
Umbilical cord blood stem cells.脐带血干细胞
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Dec;18(6):893-908. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.06.004.