• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会脆弱性与结直肠强化康复计划失败之间的关联。

The association of social vulnerability with colorectal enhanced recovery program failure.

作者信息

Smith Burkely P, Hollis Robert H, Shao Connie C, Gleason Lauren, Wood Lauren, McLeod Marshall C, Kay Danielle I, Oates Gabriela R, Pisu Maria, Chu Daniel I

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BDB 581, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, United States of America.

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Pediatrics, 1600 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35233, United States of America.

出版信息

Surg Open Sci. 2023 Mar 23;13:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.03.007. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2023.03.007
PMID:37012979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066546/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) improve outcomes, but over 20 % of patients fail ERP and the contribution of social vulnerability is unknown. This study aimed to characterize the association between social vulnerability and ERP adherence and failure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of colorectal surgery patients between 2015 and 2020 utilizing ACS-NSQIP data. Patients who failed ERP (LOS > 6 days) were compared to patients not failing ERP. The CDC's social vulnerability index (SVI) was used to assess social vulnerability.

RESULT

273 of 1191 patients (22.9 %) failed ERP. SVI was a significant predictor of ERP failure (OR 4.6, 95 % CI 1.3-16.8) among those with >70 % ERP component adherence. SVI scores were significantly higher among patients non-adherent with 3 key ERP components: preoperative block (0.58 vs. 0.51, p < 0.01), early diet (0.57 vs. 0.52, p = 0.04) and early foley removal (0.55 vs. 0.50, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher social vulnerability was associated with non-adherence to 3 key ERP components as well as ERP failure among those who were adherent with >70 % of ERP components. Social vulnerability needs to be recognized, addressed, and included in efforts to further improve ERPs.

KEY MESSAGE

Social vulnerability is associated with non-adherence to enhanced recovery components and ERP failure among those with high ERP adherence. Social vulnerability needs to be addressed in efforts to improve ERPs.

摘要

背景

强化康复计划(ERPs)可改善治疗效果,但超过20%的患者在ERPs中失败,且社会脆弱性的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述社会脆弱性与ERP依从性及失败之间的关联。

方法

这是一项利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据对2015年至2020年间结直肠手术患者进行的回顾性队列研究。将ERP失败(住院时间>6天)的患者与未失败的患者进行比较。采用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)评估社会脆弱性。

结果

1191例患者中有273例(22.9%)ERP失败。在ERP组件依从性>70%的患者中,SVI是ERP失败的显著预测因素(比值比4.6,95%置信区间1.3-16.8)。在不依从3个关键ERP组件的患者中,SVI得分显著更高:术前阻滞(0.58对0.51,p<0.01)、早期饮食(0.57对0.52,p=0.04)和早期拔除导尿管(0.55对0.50,p<0.01)。

结论

较高的社会脆弱性与不依从3个关键ERP组件以及在ERP组件依从性>70%的患者中ERP失败相关。社会脆弱性需要得到认识、解决,并纳入进一步改善ERPs的努力中。

关键信息

社会脆弱性与高ERP依从性患者不依从强化康复组件及ERP失败相关。在改善ERPs的努力中需要解决社会脆弱性问题。

相似文献

1
The association of social vulnerability with colorectal enhanced recovery program failure.社会脆弱性与结直肠强化康复计划失败之间的关联。
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Mar 23;13:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.03.007. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Preoperative Education is Associated with Adherence to Downstream Components and Outcomes in a Colorectal Surgery Enhanced Recovery Program.术前教育与结直肠手术加速康复计划中对下游环节的依从性及结局相关。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 May 16;5(2):e432. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000432. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Racial disparities in postoperative outcomes persist for patients with inflammatory bowel disease under a colorectal enhanced recovery program.炎症性肠病患者在结直肠加速康复方案下,其术后结局的种族差异仍然存在。
Am J Surg. 2023 Aug;226(2):227-232. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
4
Impact of adherence to care pathway interventions on recovery following bowel resection within an established enhanced recovery program.在既定的强化康复计划中,坚持护理路径干预对肠切除术后恢复的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1760-1771. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5169-2. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
5
Association between patient activation and adherence to a colorectal enhanced recovery pathway: a prospective cohort study.患者激活与结直肠强化康复路径依从性之间的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7577-7587. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11258-z. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Does adherence to perioperative enhanced recovery pathway elements influence patient-reported recovery following colorectal resection?围手术期强化康复路径元素的依从性是否影响结直肠切除术后患者的报告恢复情况?
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3806-3815. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06684-3. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
7
Enhanced Recovery Program in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Controlled Trial.腹腔镜结直肠手术中的加速康复方案:一项观察性对照试验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):363-370. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0716. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
8
Impact of preoperative treatment with antidepressants and/or anxiolytics on outcomes after colorectal surgery with an enhanced recovery programme: a monocentric retrospective study.抗抑郁药和/或抗焦虑药术前治疗对采用加速康复方案的结直肠手术后结局的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究
Acta Chir Belg. 2023 Feb;123(1):54-61. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1940727. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
Adherence to Enhanced Recovery Protocols in NSQIP and Association With Colectomy Outcomes.增强恢复协议在 NSQIP 中的依从性与结直肠切除术结果的关系。
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):486-493. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002566.
10
Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay.新实施的强化康复路径对住院时间产生积极影响。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4019-28. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4714-8. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Neighborhood Social Determinants of Health with Acute Kidney Injury during Hospitalization.社区健康社会决定因素与住院期间急性肾损伤的关联
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Nov 1;19(11):1371-1381. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000528. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Social vulnerability is associated with increased morbidity following colorectal surgery.社会脆弱性与结直肠手术后发病率增加有关。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt A):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
The association of health literacy and postoperative complications after colorectal surgery: A cohort study.健康素养与结直肠手术后并发症的关系:一项队列研究。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jun;223(6):1047-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.10.024. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
3
Intersection of social vulnerability and residential diversity: Postoperative outcomes following resection of lung and colon cancer.社会脆弱性与居住多样性的交集:肺癌和结肠癌切除术后的结果。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;124(5):886-893. doi: 10.1002/jso.26588. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
High Social Vulnerability and "Textbook Outcomes" after Cancer Operation.癌症手术后社会弱势群体与“标准结局”。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):351-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.024. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
5
Association of County-Level Vulnerability, Patient-Level Race/Ethnicity, and Receipt of Surgery for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.县级脆弱性、患者种族/族裔与接受早期肝细胞癌手术的关联性。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):197-199. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5554.
6
County-level Social Vulnerability is Associated With Worse Surgical Outcomes Especially Among Minority Patients.县级社会脆弱性与手术结果较差相关,尤其是在少数民族患者中。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):881-891. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004691.
7
Failure of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.腹腔镜结直肠手术后加速康复外科失败:系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1007-1014. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03600-3. Epub 2020 May 2.
8
Measuring Community Vulnerability to Natural and Anthropogenic Hazards: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index.衡量社区对自然和人为灾害的脆弱性:疾病控制与预防中心的社会脆弱性指数
J Environ Health. 2018 Jun;80(10):34-36.
9
Role of Adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs in Mitigating Health Care Disparities.坚持手术后强化康复计划在减轻医疗保健差异方面的作用。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):91-92. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3486.
10
Factors associated with failure of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in colorectal and gastric surgery.结直肠和胃癌手术中与加速康复外科(ERAS)失败相关的因素。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;54(9):1124-1131. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1657176. Epub 2019 Sep 6.