Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Faculty of Medicine, Karaman, Turkey.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Dec;76(6):575-585. doi: 10.4097/kja.23064. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
BACKGROUND: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, quadratus lumborum block (QLB), and intra-articular (IA) local anesthetic injection have been shown to provide effective analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This randomized study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, motor protection, and quality of recovery associated with the PENG block, QLB, and IA injection. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients who underwent a unilateral primary THA under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to the PENG (n=30), QLB (n=30), or IA (n=29) group. The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score over the first 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption, quadriceps and adductor muscle strength, and quality of recovery (QoR-40). RESULTS: The dynamic (with movement) NRS scores at 3 and 6 h postoperatively were significantly lower in the PENG and QLB groups compared to the IA group (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). The time to first opioid analgesia requirement was longer in the PENG and QLB groups than in the IA group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.016, respectively). A provided better preservation was found in the the PENG group than in the QLB group in terms of quadriceps muscle strength at 3 h postoperatively (P = 0.007) and time to mobilization (P = 0.003). No significant differences in the QoR-40 scores were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The PENG and QLB groups showed similar analgesic effects and both showed more effective analgesia 6 h postoperatively than the IA group. All the groups showed similar postoperative quality of recovery.
背景:在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞、竖脊肌平面阻滞(QLB)和关节内(IA)局部麻醉注射已被证明能提供有效的镇痛效果。本随机研究旨在比较 PENG 阻滞、QLB 和 IA 注射在镇痛效果、运动保护和恢复质量方面的差异。
方法:89 例在脊髓麻醉下接受单侧初次 THA 的患者被随机分为 PENG(n=30)、QLB(n=30)或 IA(n=29)组。主要结局是术后 48 小时内的数字评分量表(NRS)评分。次要结局是术后阿片类药物消耗、股四头肌和内收肌力量以及恢复质量(QoR-40)。
结果:与 IA 组相比,PENG 和 QLB 组术后 3 小时和 6 小时的动态(活动时)NRS 评分显著降低(P=0.002 和 P<0.001)。PENG 和 QLB 组首次需要阿片类药物镇痛的时间长于 IA 组(P=0.009 和 P=0.016)。与 QLB 组相比,PENG 组在术后 3 小时时股四头肌力量(P=0.007)和开始活动时间(P=0.003)方面有更好的保留。各组间 QoR-40 评分无显著差异。
结论:PENG 和 QLB 组的镇痛效果相似,且与 IA 组相比,6 小时后镇痛效果更显著。各组术后恢复质量相似。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024-11
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021-4
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019-10-25
J Clin Anesth. 2019-12