• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节置换术患者行髋关节囊周围神经阻滞与关节内阻滞和竖脊肌平面阻滞的效果比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Faculty of Medicine, Karaman, Turkey.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Dec;76(6):575-585. doi: 10.4097/kja.23064. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

DOI:10.4097/kja.23064
PMID:37013389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10718628/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, quadratus lumborum block (QLB), and intra-articular (IA) local anesthetic injection have been shown to provide effective analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This randomized study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, motor protection, and quality of recovery associated with the PENG block, QLB, and IA injection.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients who underwent a unilateral primary THA under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to the PENG (n=30), QLB (n=30), or IA (n=29) group. The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score over the first 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption, quadriceps and adductor muscle strength, and quality of recovery (QoR-40).

RESULTS

The dynamic (with movement) NRS scores at 3 and 6 h postoperatively were significantly lower in the PENG and QLB groups compared to the IA group (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). The time to first opioid analgesia requirement was longer in the PENG and QLB groups than in the IA group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.016, respectively). A provided better preservation was found in the the PENG group than in the QLB group in terms of quadriceps muscle strength at 3 h postoperatively (P = 0.007) and time to mobilization (P = 0.003). No significant differences in the QoR-40 scores were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The PENG and QLB groups showed similar analgesic effects and both showed more effective analgesia 6 h postoperatively than the IA group. All the groups showed similar postoperative quality of recovery.

摘要

背景

在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞、竖脊肌平面阻滞(QLB)和关节内(IA)局部麻醉注射已被证明能提供有效的镇痛效果。本随机研究旨在比较 PENG 阻滞、QLB 和 IA 注射在镇痛效果、运动保护和恢复质量方面的差异。

方法

89 例在脊髓麻醉下接受单侧初次 THA 的患者被随机分为 PENG(n=30)、QLB(n=30)或 IA(n=29)组。主要结局是术后 48 小时内的数字评分量表(NRS)评分。次要结局是术后阿片类药物消耗、股四头肌和内收肌力量以及恢复质量(QoR-40)。

结果

与 IA 组相比,PENG 和 QLB 组术后 3 小时和 6 小时的动态(活动时)NRS 评分显著降低(P=0.002 和 P<0.001)。PENG 和 QLB 组首次需要阿片类药物镇痛的时间长于 IA 组(P=0.009 和 P=0.016)。与 QLB 组相比,PENG 组在术后 3 小时时股四头肌力量(P=0.007)和开始活动时间(P=0.003)方面有更好的保留。各组间 QoR-40 评分无显著差异。

结论

PENG 和 QLB 组的镇痛效果相似,且与 IA 组相比,6 小时后镇痛效果更显著。各组术后恢复质量相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b329/10718628/1621df96eff9/kja-23064f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b329/10718628/f9f9ffff41ac/kja-23064f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b329/10718628/87a93168a400/kja-23064f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b329/10718628/1621df96eff9/kja-23064f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b329/10718628/f9f9ffff41ac/kja-23064f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b329/10718628/87a93168a400/kja-23064f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b329/10718628/1621df96eff9/kja-23064f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.髋关节置换术患者行髋关节囊周围神经阻滞与关节内阻滞和竖脊肌平面阻滞的效果比较:一项随机对照试验。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Dec;76(6):575-585. doi: 10.4097/kja.23064. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
2
Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group and Lateral Quadratus Lumborum Blocks for Analgesia after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.原发性全髋关节置换术后关节周围神经组阻滞与腰方肌外侧阻滞用于镇痛的比较:一项随机对照试验
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 18:2024.07.18.24310628. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.18.24310628.
3
Comparison of pericapsular nerve group and lateral quadratus lumborum blocks on cumulative opioid consumption after primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.关节囊周围神经组与腰方肌外侧阻滞对初次全髋关节置换术后累积阿片类药物消耗量的影响比较:一项随机对照试验
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Oct 10. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105875.
4
The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block combined with Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) compared to placebo and LIA in hip arthroplasty surgery: a multi-center double-blinded randomized-controlled trial.关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞联合局部浸润镇痛(LIA)与安慰剂和 LIA 在髋关节置换术中的比较:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 6;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01787-2.
5
Comparison of continuous pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus continuous fascia iliaca compartment block on pain management and quadriceps muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study.连续关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与连续股外侧肌间隔阻滞对全髋关节置换术后疼痛管理和股四头肌肌力的比较:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 11;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02190-1.
6
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Combined With Local Infiltration Analgesia on Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞联合局部浸润镇痛对全髋关节置换术后疼痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1096-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
7
Comparison between Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Local Infiltration Analgesia for Postoperative Analgesia after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导关节囊周围神经阻滞与局部浸润镇痛在全髋关节置换术后镇痛效果的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):1839-1846. doi: 10.1111/os.13777. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
8
Quality of recovery after pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia: a randomised controlled observer-blinded trial.椎管内麻醉下单次髋关节囊周围神经阻滞(PENG 阻滞)对初次全髋关节置换术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照、观察者设盲试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jun;130(6):773-779. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.017. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
9
Continuous quadratus lumborum block and femoral nerve block for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study.持续腰方肌阻滞和股神经阻滞用于全髋关节置换术:一项随机研究。
J Anesth. 2020 Jun;34(3):413-420. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02769-9. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
10
Comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.髋关节置换术中囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞与股外侧皮神经阻滞和髂筋膜间隙阻滞(S-FICB)的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Anesth. 2023 Aug;37(4):503-510. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03192-6. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block for pain control and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.关节囊周围神经阻滞对全髋关节置换术后疼痛控制和功能恢复的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Aug 4;10(8):589-599. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2024-0105.
2
Comparison of pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block for hip fracture surgery: a randomized clinical trial.髋关节骨折手术中关节周围神经丛阻滞与腰方肌前路阻滞的比较:一项随机临床试验
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025 May 23;75(5):844643. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844643.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.全髋关节置换术前关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Mar;47(3):155-160. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103228. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty.随机比较囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞与骼腹股沟筋膜阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的应用。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Oct;46(10):874-878. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
3
Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, observer-masked, controlled trial.
Regional anesthesia for hip surgery: A review of current approaches and their application to clinical practice.
髋关节手术的区域麻醉:当前方法及其在临床实践中的应用综述。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Apr-Jun;19(2):164-173. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_68_25. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
4
Functional recovery and pain control following Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block following hip surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.髋关节手术后关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞的功能恢复和疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Mar 19;145(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05825-9.
5
Effects of pericapsular nerve group block versus local anesthetic infiltration for postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.关节囊周围神经组阻滞与局部麻醉浸润用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0319102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319102. eCollection 2025.
6
Is pericapsular nerve group block superior to other regional analgesia techniques following total hip arthroplasty? a systematic review and network meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术后,关节周围神经组阻滞是否优于其他区域镇痛技术?一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 4;13(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00455-y.
7
Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Total hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中应用外周神经阻滞。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Nov;28(11):1113-1121. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01287-7. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
8
Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block or Wound Infiltration Combined with Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Postoperative Analgesia following Total Hip Arthroplasty through Posterior Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial.股外侧皮神经阻滞或伤口浸润联合关节周围神经组(PENG)阻滞用于后入路全髋关节置换术后镇痛:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2024 May 2;13(9):2674. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092674.
9
Response to "Comment on Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial".对“关于在初次全髋关节置换术中关节周围神经组阻滞与关节内阻滞和腰方肌阻滞的比较的评论:一项随机对照试验”的回应
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Aug;77(4):485-487. doi: 10.4097/kja.24215. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
Comment on "Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial".关于“初次全髋关节置换术中关节周围神经组阻滞与关节内阻滞及腰方肌阻滞的比较:一项随机对照试验”的评论
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun;77(3):405-406. doi: 10.4097/kja.24070. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞对全髋关节置换术后镇痛和功能恢复的影响:一项随机、观察者设盲、对照试验。
Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1492-1498. doi: 10.1111/anae.15536. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides improved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial.关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经阻滞相比,可为髋关节骨折手术提供更好的短期镇痛效果:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 May;46(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102315. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
5
Sensory Innervation of the Hip Joint and Referred Pain: A Systematic Review of the Literature.髋关节感觉神经支配和牵涉痛:文献系统综述。
Pain Med. 2021 May 21;22(5):1149-1157. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab061.
6
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Combination With the Quadratus Lumborum Block Analgesia for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series.关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞联合腰方肌阻滞用于翻修全髋关节置换术的镇痛:一项回顾性病例系列研究
Cureus. 2020 Dec 23;12(12):e12233. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12233.
7
Pericapsular nerve group block: an overview.囊周神经群阻滞:概述。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Apr;87(4):458-466. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14798-9. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
Effects of early mobilization and weight bearing on postoperative walking ability and pain in geriatric patients operated due to hip fracture: a retrospective analysis.早期活动和负重对老年髋部骨折术后行走能力和疼痛的影响:回顾性分析。
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Feb 13;50(1):117-125. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-57.
9
Anterior quadratus lumborum block analgesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.腰方肌前阻滞镇痛用于全髋关节置换术:一项随机对照研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Oct 25. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100804.
10
Gray zone of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block.关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞的灰色地带。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Dec;58:123-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 27.