Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia Health Authority and IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jun;130(6):773-779. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.017. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional anaesthesia technique that has been proposed as an effective motor-sparing block for total hip arthroplasty. Recent randomised studies show conflicting results regarding the analgesic efficacy of the PENG block for total hip arthroplasty.
We conducted a randomised controlled observer-blinded single-centre superiority trial comparing the efficacy of the PENG block with no block for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia. All subjects received multimodal analgesia consisting of paracetamol and celecoxib. The primary outcome was quality of recovery (QoR) at 24 h as measured by the QoR-15 questionnaire.
A total of 112 participants (56 in each group) were included in the analysis. The median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) 24-h QoR-15 scores were higher in subjects who received a PENG block (132 [116-138]) compared with subjects who did not (103 [97-112]) with a median difference of 26 (95% confidence interval, 18-31; P<0.001). Similarly, QoR-15 at 48 h was higher in the PENG group, and opioid use at 24 and 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the PENG group. However, we did not find significant differences in pain score, distance to ambulation, or anti-emetic use at any time point. We did not observe any PENG block-related complications.
Adding a PENG block to a multimodal analgesia regimen that includes paracetamol and celecoxib improves the quality of recovery and reduces opioid requirements for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia.
NCT04591353.
囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞是一种新的区域麻醉技术,已被提出作为全髋关节置换术的有效肌松阻滞方法。最近的随机研究显示,PENG 阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的镇痛效果存在相互矛盾的结果。
我们进行了一项随机对照、观察者盲法、单中心优效性试验,比较了 PENG 阻滞与无阻滞在椎管内麻醉下接受初次全髋关节置换术的患者的疗效。所有患者均接受包含扑热息痛和塞来昔布的多模式镇痛。主要结局是通过 QoR-15 问卷测量的 24 小时时的恢复质量(QoR)。
共有 112 名参与者(每组 56 名)纳入分析。接受 PENG 阻滞的患者(132 [116-138])的 24 小时 QoR-15 评分中位数(四分位距 [IQR])高于未接受 PENG 阻滞的患者(103 [97-112]),中位数差异为 26(95%置信区间,18-31;P<0.001)。同样,PENG 组在 48 小时时的 QoR-15 评分更高,并且 PENG 组在术后 24 和 48 小时时的阿片类药物使用量显著更低。然而,我们在任何时间点均未发现疼痛评分、步行距离或止吐药使用的显著差异。我们未观察到与 PENG 阻滞相关的并发症。
在包含扑热息痛和塞来昔布的多模式镇痛方案中添加 PENG 阻滞可改善接受椎管内麻醉下初次全髋关节置换术的患者的恢复质量,并减少阿片类药物的需求。
NCT04591353。